Henrik Lynge Hovgaard, Simon Tilma Vistisen, Johannes Enevoldsen, Frank Vincenzo de Paoli, Peter Juhl-Olsen
{"title":"The haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum on pulse pressure variation - a prospective, observational study.","authors":"Henrik Lynge Hovgaard, Simon Tilma Vistisen, Johannes Enevoldsen, Frank Vincenzo de Paoli, Peter Juhl-Olsen","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01300-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) remain uncertain. This uncertainty arises from potentially opposing physiological mechanisms that affect cardiovascular dynamics during conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Deriving PPV with high precision during induction of pneumoperitoneum may provide new insights into the complex relationship between intra-abdominal pressure changes and PPV. The hypothesis was that PPV derived from a generalised additive model (PPV<sub>GAM</sub>) would increase with the induction of pneumoperitoneum and the associacted increase in IAP. This was a prospective, observational study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Before and after induction of pneumoperitoneum, haemodynamic variables including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV) were recorded with the Hemosphere monitor. PPV<sub>GAM</sub> was estimated offline from the arterial blood pressure curve. A total of 34 patients were included in the final analysis. PPV<sub>GAM</sub> increased by a factor of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.25-1.77) as intra-abdominal pressure increased from baseline to 12 mmHg. SVV and PPV from the HemoSphere monitor increased with a factor of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13-1.39, p < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.29, p = 0.048), respectively. PPV derived from a generalised additive model increased approximately 50% from the induction of pneumoperitoneum to an IAP of 12 mmHg. PPV and SVV derived from the Hemosphere monitor also increased signicantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01300-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The effects of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) remain uncertain. This uncertainty arises from potentially opposing physiological mechanisms that affect cardiovascular dynamics during conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Deriving PPV with high precision during induction of pneumoperitoneum may provide new insights into the complex relationship between intra-abdominal pressure changes and PPV. The hypothesis was that PPV derived from a generalised additive model (PPVGAM) would increase with the induction of pneumoperitoneum and the associacted increase in IAP. This was a prospective, observational study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Before and after induction of pneumoperitoneum, haemodynamic variables including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV) were recorded with the Hemosphere monitor. PPVGAM was estimated offline from the arterial blood pressure curve. A total of 34 patients were included in the final analysis. PPVGAM increased by a factor of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.25-1.77) as intra-abdominal pressure increased from baseline to 12 mmHg. SVV and PPV from the HemoSphere monitor increased with a factor of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13-1.39, p < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.29, p = 0.048), respectively. PPV derived from a generalised additive model increased approximately 50% from the induction of pneumoperitoneum to an IAP of 12 mmHg. PPV and SVV derived from the Hemosphere monitor also increased signicantly.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine.
The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group.
The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.