The haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum on pulse pressure variation - a prospective, observational study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Henrik Lynge Hovgaard, Simon Tilma Vistisen, Johannes Enevoldsen, Frank Vincenzo de Paoli, Peter Juhl-Olsen
{"title":"The haemodynamic effects of pneumoperitoneum on pulse pressure variation - a prospective, observational study.","authors":"Henrik Lynge Hovgaard, Simon Tilma Vistisen, Johannes Enevoldsen, Frank Vincenzo de Paoli, Peter Juhl-Olsen","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01300-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effects of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) remain uncertain. This uncertainty arises from potentially opposing physiological mechanisms that affect cardiovascular dynamics during conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Deriving PPV with high precision during induction of pneumoperitoneum may provide new insights into the complex relationship between intra-abdominal pressure changes and PPV. The hypothesis was that PPV derived from a generalised additive model (PPV<sub>GAM</sub>) would increase with the induction of pneumoperitoneum and the associacted increase in IAP. This was a prospective, observational study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Before and after induction of pneumoperitoneum, haemodynamic variables including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV) were recorded with the Hemosphere monitor. PPV<sub>GAM</sub> was estimated offline from the arterial blood pressure curve. A total of 34 patients were included in the final analysis. PPV<sub>GAM</sub> increased by a factor of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.25-1.77) as intra-abdominal pressure increased from baseline to 12 mmHg. SVV and PPV from the HemoSphere monitor increased with a factor of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13-1.39, p < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.29, p = 0.048), respectively. PPV derived from a generalised additive model increased approximately 50% from the induction of pneumoperitoneum to an IAP of 12 mmHg. PPV and SVV derived from the Hemosphere monitor also increased signicantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01300-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The effects of pneumoperitoneum on dynamic predictors of fluid responsiveness such as pulse pressure variation (PPV) remain uncertain. This uncertainty arises from potentially opposing physiological mechanisms that affect cardiovascular dynamics during conditions with increased intra-abdominal pressure (IAP). Deriving PPV with high precision during induction of pneumoperitoneum may provide new insights into the complex relationship between intra-abdominal pressure changes and PPV. The hypothesis was that PPV derived from a generalised additive model (PPVGAM) would increase with the induction of pneumoperitoneum and the associacted increase in IAP. This was a prospective, observational study in patients undergoing oesophagectomy. Before and after induction of pneumoperitoneum, haemodynamic variables including PPV and stroke volume variation (SVV) were recorded with the Hemosphere monitor. PPVGAM was estimated offline from the arterial blood pressure curve. A total of 34 patients were included in the final analysis. PPVGAM increased by a factor of 1.49 (95% CI: 1.25-1.77) as intra-abdominal pressure increased from baseline to 12 mmHg. SVV and PPV from the HemoSphere monitor increased with a factor of 1.25 (95% CI: 1.13-1.39, p < 0.001) and 1.14 (95% CI: 1.00-1.29, p = 0.048), respectively. PPV derived from a generalised additive model increased approximately 50% from the induction of pneumoperitoneum to an IAP of 12 mmHg. PPV and SVV derived from the Hemosphere monitor also increased signicantly.

气腹对脉压变化的血流动力学影响——一项前瞻性观察性研究。
气腹对诸如脉冲压力变化(PPV)等流体反应性动态预测指标的影响仍不确定。这种不确定性源于腹内压(IAP)升高时影响心血管动力学的潜在相反生理机制。在气腹诱导过程中高精度地推导PPV可能为了解腹内压力变化与PPV之间的复杂关系提供新的见解。假设从广义加性模型(PPVGAM)衍生的PPV会随着气腹的诱导和相关的IAP增加而增加。这是一项前瞻性观察性研究,研究对象是接受食管切除术的患者。在气腹诱导前后,用血球监测仪记录PPV、脑卒中容积变化(SVV)等血流动力学指标。PPVGAM通过动脉血压曲线离线估计。最终分析共纳入34例患者。当腹内压从基线增加到12 mmHg时,PPVGAM增加了1.49倍(95% CI: 1.25-1.77)。血球监测仪的SVV和PPV增加了1.25倍(95% CI: 1.13-1.39, p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信