Impact of an interactive communication application on the satisfaction and anxiety of intubated patients admitted to intensive care units: A randomized clinical trial.

Q3 Medicine
Mostafa Taheri, Mohadese Samimi, Alun C Jackson, Farshad Sharifi, Masoumeh Imanipour, Fatemeh Bahramnezhad
{"title":"Impact of an interactive communication application on the satisfaction and anxiety of intubated patients admitted to intensive care units: A randomized clinical trial.","authors":"Mostafa Taheri, Mohadese Samimi, Alun C Jackson, Farshad Sharifi, Masoumeh Imanipour, Fatemeh Bahramnezhad","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_50_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This article has examined the possibility of communicating with conscious intubated patients using an application and its effect on anxiety and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical trial study was conducted from March 5, 2021, to August 8, 2023, with the target population of conscious intubated patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) of hospitals affiliated with Qom University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to groups using a randomized block method with blocks of four (27 people in each group). Subjects completed the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale questionnaire along with a researcher-made questionnaire to assess satisfaction levels. After 4 days, the questionnaires were re-administered and the results were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and <i>t</i>-tests with SPSS version 16.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the control and intervention groups had similar demographic characteristics. Postintervention, the satisfaction levels in the intervention group (mean 92.13 ± 16.25) significantly increased compared to the control group (mean 70.50 ± 6.06) (<i>P</i> = 0.001). In addition, anxiety levels after the intervention were lower in the intervention group (mean 29.12 ± 6.51) than in the control group (mean 88.49 ± 46.31) (<i>P</i> = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These results have significant implications for patients in ICU who may struggle to communicate their needs. In addition, this communication tool has the potential to enhance the quality of communication between patients and nurses, boost adherence to care plans, lower rates of re-hospitalization, and ultimately improve patient health.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"15 1","pages":"4-10"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12020943/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_50_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/3/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This article has examined the possibility of communicating with conscious intubated patients using an application and its effect on anxiety and satisfaction.

Methods: This clinical trial study was conducted from March 5, 2021, to August 8, 2023, with the target population of conscious intubated patients hospitalized in intensive care units (ICUs) of hospitals affiliated with Qom University of Medical Sciences in Iran. Patients who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to groups using a randomized block method with blocks of four (27 people in each group). Subjects completed the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale questionnaire along with a researcher-made questionnaire to assess satisfaction levels. After 4 days, the questionnaires were re-administered and the results were analyzed using descriptive and analytical statistics, as well as Kruskal-Wallis and t-tests with SPSS version 16.

Results: Both the control and intervention groups had similar demographic characteristics. Postintervention, the satisfaction levels in the intervention group (mean 92.13 ± 16.25) significantly increased compared to the control group (mean 70.50 ± 6.06) (P = 0.001). In addition, anxiety levels after the intervention were lower in the intervention group (mean 29.12 ± 6.51) than in the control group (mean 88.49 ± 46.31) (P = 0.001).

Conclusion: These results have significant implications for patients in ICU who may struggle to communicate their needs. In addition, this communication tool has the potential to enhance the quality of communication between patients and nurses, boost adherence to care plans, lower rates of re-hospitalization, and ultimately improve patient health.

Abstract Image

互动沟通应用对重症监护病房插管患者满意度和焦虑的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景:本文研究了使用应用程序与有意识插管患者沟通的可能性及其对焦虑和满意度的影响。方法:本临床试验研究于2021年3月5日至2023年8月8日在伊朗库姆医科大学附属医院重症监护病房(icu)住院的有意识插管患者进行。符合纳入标准的患者采用随机分组法随机分组,每组4人(每组27人)。受试者完成了汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表问卷和一份研究者制作的问卷来评估满意度。4天后,重新进行问卷调查,使用描述性统计和分析性统计,并使用SPSS 16版进行Kruskal-Wallis检验和t检验。结果:对照组和干预组的人口学特征相似。干预后,干预组患者的满意度水平(平均92.13±16.25)明显高于对照组(平均70.50±6.06)(P = 0.001)。干预组患者干预后焦虑水平(平均29.12±6.51)低于对照组(平均88.49±46.31)(P = 0.001)。结论:这些结果对ICU患者可能难以沟通自己的需求具有重要意义。此外,这种沟通工具有可能提高患者和护士之间的沟通质量,促进对护理计划的遵守,降低再住院率,并最终改善患者的健康状况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信