Surgical Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of Anterior and Posterior Approach.

Shekhar Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Virendra Kumar Verma, Mohit Issrani, Swasti Sundar Prasad, Vishwakarma C Hodigere
{"title":"Surgical Decision-Making in Thoracolumbar Fractures: A Systematic Review of Anterior and Posterior Approach.","authors":"Shekhar Mishra, Pankaj Kumar Mishra, Virendra Kumar Verma, Mohit Issrani, Swasti Sundar Prasad, Vishwakarma C Hodigere","doi":"10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Fractures in the thoracolumbar region of the vertebral column are very common and often require surgical intervention. Surgery is typically aimed at restoring or maintaining neurological function and correction of the vertebral column.</p><p><strong>Systematic review: </strong>There are two commonly used approaches for surgery, the anterior and the posterior approach. Uncertainties remain regarding the best surgical approach for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The results of studies comparing the anterior and posterior surgical approaches for treating thoraco-lumbar fractures have been compiled in this review. Numerous metrics, including neurological results, Cobb angle recovery, and post-operative complications, have been used. It was observed that both approaches yielded a similar result when considering the improvement in Frankel grades and recovery of the Cobb angle.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We further report that patients undergoing decompression using the anterior approach incurred higher blood loss, longer hospital stays, and higher operating costs; these findings support the posterior approach as being safer and more practical.</p>","PeriodicalId":16647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","volume":"15 5","pages":"204-211"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12064250/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Case Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13107/jocr.2025.v15.i05.5612","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Fractures in the thoracolumbar region of the vertebral column are very common and often require surgical intervention. Surgery is typically aimed at restoring or maintaining neurological function and correction of the vertebral column.

Systematic review: There are two commonly used approaches for surgery, the anterior and the posterior approach. Uncertainties remain regarding the best surgical approach for the treatment of traumatic thoracolumbar fractures. The results of studies comparing the anterior and posterior surgical approaches for treating thoraco-lumbar fractures have been compiled in this review. Numerous metrics, including neurological results, Cobb angle recovery, and post-operative complications, have been used. It was observed that both approaches yielded a similar result when considering the improvement in Frankel grades and recovery of the Cobb angle.

Conclusion: We further report that patients undergoing decompression using the anterior approach incurred higher blood loss, longer hospital stays, and higher operating costs; these findings support the posterior approach as being safer and more practical.

胸腰椎骨折的手术决策:前后路入路的系统回顾。
脊柱胸腰段骨折是非常常见的,通常需要手术干预。外科手术通常旨在恢复或维持神经功能和矫正脊柱。系统综述:有两种常用的手术入路,前路和后路。创伤性胸腰椎骨折的最佳手术方法仍不确定。比较前路和后路手术入路治疗胸腰椎骨折的研究结果已在本综述中汇编。使用了许多指标,包括神经学结果、Cobb角恢复和术后并发症。当考虑到Frankel等级的提高和Cobb角的采收率时,两种方法都产生了相似的结果。结论:我们进一步报道,采用前路减压的患者失血量更高,住院时间更长,手术费用更高;这些发现支持后路入路更安全、更实用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
128
审稿时长
30 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信