Hands-free Atalante exoskeleton in post-stroke gait and balance rehabilitation: a safety study.

IF 5.2 2区 医学 Q1 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Thierry Lejeune, Dijana Nuic, Stéphanie Dehem, Jean-Gabriel Previnaire, Céline Cuenot, Thierry Debugne, Jerome Kaps, Bérénice Paul, Vincent Pean, Sergi Sanz Perez, Fanny Juhel, Soultana Tatsidou, Jacques Kerdraon
{"title":"Hands-free Atalante exoskeleton in post-stroke gait and balance rehabilitation: a safety study.","authors":"Thierry Lejeune, Dijana Nuic, Stéphanie Dehem, Jean-Gabriel Previnaire, Céline Cuenot, Thierry Debugne, Jerome Kaps, Bérénice Paul, Vincent Pean, Sergi Sanz Perez, Fanny Juhel, Soultana Tatsidou, Jacques Kerdraon","doi":"10.1186/s12984-025-01621-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke often results in gait dysfunction, impairing daily activities and quality of life. Overground robotic exoskeletons hold promise for post-stroke rehabilitation. This study primarily aimed to assess the safety of hands-free Atalante exoskeleton training in post-stroke subjects, with a secondary aim to assess gait and balance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty subjects (10.2 ± 12.1 months post-stroke) with gait dysfunction (Functional Ambulation Category [FAC] score ≤ 3) underwent five training sessions over three weeks with a hands-free exoskeleton (Atalante, Wandercraft, France). Safety, the primary outcome, was evaluated by the number and severity of adverse events (AEs), judged by an independent clinical evaluation committee (CEC). A usability test was performed during the fifth training session followed by the exoskeleton use questionnaire. Gait and balance were assessed pre/post-training via walking capacity score (FAC), gait speed by 10-meter walk test (10MWT), walked distance by 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and balance by Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Spasticity was assessed with the Modified Ashworth scale. Anxiety and depression were quantified using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Safety outcomes were analyzed using the Wilson, Lee and Dubin methods for proportions, and occurrence rates were computed. Within-group differences were compared using Wilcoxon, McNemar, and Friedman tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Thirty-one subjects completed the training sessions, while nine discontinued. The study reported two serious adverse events (SAE) (vertigo, dysarthria) and six AEs, with the CEC concluding that no SAE was linked to the device/study procedure. The average AE rate per session was 2.5 ± 1.4%, including four events possibly linked to the device/study procedure (knee pain [n = 1], skin lacerations [n = 3]), classified as negligible or minor by the CEC. A high proportion (82.6%) successfully completed the usability test and reported satisfaction (90%) on the exoskeleton use questionnaire. For gait and balance, favorable changes were observed in FAC, 10MWT, 6MWT, and BBS scores Post-training (p < 0.05, respectively). Spasticity, anxiety, and depression remained unchanged.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study indicates that the hands-free Atalante exoskeleton is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated for gait and balance rehabilitation in post-stroke subjects, warranting larger randomized controlled trials to assess its efficacy.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident (INSPIRE) trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04694001, registered on 20201231).</p>","PeriodicalId":16384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","volume":"22 1","pages":"82"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11992748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-025-01621-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke often results in gait dysfunction, impairing daily activities and quality of life. Overground robotic exoskeletons hold promise for post-stroke rehabilitation. This study primarily aimed to assess the safety of hands-free Atalante exoskeleton training in post-stroke subjects, with a secondary aim to assess gait and balance.

Methods: Forty subjects (10.2 ± 12.1 months post-stroke) with gait dysfunction (Functional Ambulation Category [FAC] score ≤ 3) underwent five training sessions over three weeks with a hands-free exoskeleton (Atalante, Wandercraft, France). Safety, the primary outcome, was evaluated by the number and severity of adverse events (AEs), judged by an independent clinical evaluation committee (CEC). A usability test was performed during the fifth training session followed by the exoskeleton use questionnaire. Gait and balance were assessed pre/post-training via walking capacity score (FAC), gait speed by 10-meter walk test (10MWT), walked distance by 6-minute walk test (6MWT), and balance by Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Spasticity was assessed with the Modified Ashworth scale. Anxiety and depression were quantified using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Safety outcomes were analyzed using the Wilson, Lee and Dubin methods for proportions, and occurrence rates were computed. Within-group differences were compared using Wilcoxon, McNemar, and Friedman tests, with significance set at P < 0.05.

Results: Thirty-one subjects completed the training sessions, while nine discontinued. The study reported two serious adverse events (SAE) (vertigo, dysarthria) and six AEs, with the CEC concluding that no SAE was linked to the device/study procedure. The average AE rate per session was 2.5 ± 1.4%, including four events possibly linked to the device/study procedure (knee pain [n = 1], skin lacerations [n = 3]), classified as negligible or minor by the CEC. A high proportion (82.6%) successfully completed the usability test and reported satisfaction (90%) on the exoskeleton use questionnaire. For gait and balance, favorable changes were observed in FAC, 10MWT, 6MWT, and BBS scores Post-training (p < 0.05, respectively). Spasticity, anxiety, and depression remained unchanged.

Conclusions: This study indicates that the hands-free Atalante exoskeleton is safe, feasible, and well-tolerated for gait and balance rehabilitation in post-stroke subjects, warranting larger randomized controlled trials to assess its efficacy.

Trial registration: Evaluation of the Use of the Atalante Exoskeleton in Patients Presenting an Hemiplegia Due to Cerebrovascular Accident (INSPIRE) trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04694001, registered on 20201231).

免提Atalante外骨骼在卒中后步态和平衡康复中的应用:一项安全性研究。
背景:中风常导致步态障碍,影响日常活动和生活质量。地面机器人外骨骼有望用于中风后的康复。本研究的主要目的是评估卒中后受试者免手Atalante外骨骼训练的安全性,次要目的是评估步态和平衡。方法:40例(卒中后10.2±12.1个月)步态障碍(功能行走分类[FAC]评分≤3)的受试者在三周内使用免提外骨骼进行五次训练(Atalante, Wandercraft, France)。安全性是主要结局,由独立临床评估委员会(CEC)根据不良事件(ae)的数量和严重程度进行评估。在第五次培训期间进行可用性测试,随后进行外骨骼使用问卷调查。通过步行能力评分(FAC)、10米步行速度测试(10MWT)、6分钟步行距离测试(6MWT)和伯格平衡量表(BBS)评估训练前后的步态和平衡。采用改良Ashworth量表评估痉挛性。使用医院焦虑抑郁量表对焦虑和抑郁进行量化。使用Wilson, Lee和Dubin方法分析安全性结果的比例,并计算发生率。使用Wilcoxon、McNemar和Friedman检验比较组内差异,显著性设置为P。结果:31名受试者完成了培训课程,9名受试者停止了培训。该研究报告了2个严重不良事件(SAE)(眩晕、构音障碍)和6个ae, CEC的结论是没有SAE与设备/研究过程相关。每次治疗的平均AE发生率为2.5±1.4%,包括4个可能与器械/研究过程相关的事件(膝关节疼痛[n = 1],皮肤撕裂[n = 3]),被CEC分类为可忽略或轻微。高比例(82.6%)成功完成了可用性测试,并报告了外骨骼使用问卷的满意度(90%)。对于步态和平衡,训练后FAC、10MWT、6MWT和BBS评分发生了良好的变化(p)。结论:本研究表明,Atalante免提外骨骼对于卒中后受试者的步态和平衡康复是安全、可行和耐受性良好的,需要更大规模的随机对照试验来评估其疗效。试验注册:评估Atalante外骨骼在脑血管意外偏瘫患者中的应用(INSPIRE)试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(NCT04694001,注册号20201231)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 工程技术-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
9.60
自引率
3.90%
发文量
122
审稿时长
24 months
期刊介绍: Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation considers manuscripts on all aspects of research that result from cross-fertilization of the fields of neuroscience, biomedical engineering, and physical medicine & rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信