Barriers to recruitment of an observational SARS-CoV-2 emergency department cohort at Boston Medical Center.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Sarah J Thomson, Roxanne Mistry, Henry Bayly, Victoria Overbeck, Manish Sagar, Elissa M Schechter-Perkins, Laura F White, Karen R Jacobson, Tara C Bouton
{"title":"Barriers to recruitment of an observational SARS-CoV-2 emergency department cohort at Boston Medical Center.","authors":"Sarah J Thomson, Roxanne Mistry, Henry Bayly, Victoria Overbeck, Manish Sagar, Elissa M Schechter-Perkins, Laura F White, Karen R Jacobson, Tara C Bouton","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01224-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Successful recruitment of study participants is a challenging component of research, and recruitment barriers are amplified in safety-net hospital (SNH) settings. However, engaging historically underrepresented groups in research is critically important to improve health disparities and outcomes. We summarize challenges we encountered while recruiting patients with COVID-19 from the emergency department (ED), actions to improve inclusivity, and implementation hurdles in an SNH setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an observational study at the largest safety-net hospital in New England, recruiting patients in the ED with confirmed COVID-19. Investigators prioritized recruitment inclusivity through language translations of study materials, compensation (including transport and travel reimbursement), flexible sample delivery options, and clinical staff engagement. We identified and categorized major impediments to recruitment success.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Recruitment and retention efforts were largely unsuccessful (n = 4 enrolled of n = 113 eligible by electronic medical record (EMR) review). Barriers to recruitment success included clinical teams' perception of good candidacy, persistent language barriers, limited consent capacity, burden of participation, and ED discharge logistics.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite efforts to improve opportunities to participate in research, SNH EDs present unique challenges for recruitment. Study teams should prioritize clinical staff engagement and work with institutions to promote inclusivity and community engagement efforts to improve research engagement in these settings.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial number: </strong>Not applicable.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"68"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12010546/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01224-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Successful recruitment of study participants is a challenging component of research, and recruitment barriers are amplified in safety-net hospital (SNH) settings. However, engaging historically underrepresented groups in research is critically important to improve health disparities and outcomes. We summarize challenges we encountered while recruiting patients with COVID-19 from the emergency department (ED), actions to improve inclusivity, and implementation hurdles in an SNH setting.

Methods: We conducted an observational study at the largest safety-net hospital in New England, recruiting patients in the ED with confirmed COVID-19. Investigators prioritized recruitment inclusivity through language translations of study materials, compensation (including transport and travel reimbursement), flexible sample delivery options, and clinical staff engagement. We identified and categorized major impediments to recruitment success.

Results: Recruitment and retention efforts were largely unsuccessful (n = 4 enrolled of n = 113 eligible by electronic medical record (EMR) review). Barriers to recruitment success included clinical teams' perception of good candidacy, persistent language barriers, limited consent capacity, burden of participation, and ED discharge logistics.

Conclusions: Despite efforts to improve opportunities to participate in research, SNH EDs present unique challenges for recruitment. Study teams should prioritize clinical staff engagement and work with institutions to promote inclusivity and community engagement efforts to improve research engagement in these settings.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

招募波士顿医疗中心观察性SARS-CoV-2急诊科队列的障碍
背景:成功招募研究参与者是研究的一个具有挑战性的组成部分,在安全网医院(SNH)设置中,招募障碍被放大。然而,让历史上代表性不足的群体参与研究对于改善健康差距和结果至关重要。我们总结了从急诊科(ED)招募COVID-19患者时遇到的挑战,提高包容性的行动以及SNH环境中的实施障碍。方法:我们在新英格兰最大的安全网医院进行了一项观察性研究,招募了在急诊室确诊的COVID-19患者。研究人员通过研究材料的语言翻译、补偿(包括交通和旅行报销)、灵活的样品递送选择和临床工作人员参与来优先考虑招聘的包容性。我们确定并分类了影响招聘成功的主要障碍。结果:招募和保留的努力在很大程度上是不成功的(n = 4入组,n = 113通过电子病历(EMR)审查)。招募成功的障碍包括临床团队对良好候选资格的看法、持续的语言障碍、有限的同意能力、参与负担和急诊科出院后勤。结论:尽管努力改善参与研究的机会,但SNH ed在招聘方面面临着独特的挑战。研究团队应优先考虑临床工作人员的参与,并与机构合作,促进包容性和社区参与,以改善这些环境中的研究参与。临床试验号:不适用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信