Comparison of emergency physician opinions with MSOFA and PREMEWS scores in determining the necessity of non-traumatic internal medicine patient transfers to the emergency department: a longitudinal study.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Abbasali Ebrahimian, Ali Fakhr-Movahedi, Mohammad Taghi Shahcheragh, Seyyed Hossein Shahcheragh
{"title":"Comparison of emergency physician opinions with MSOFA and PREMEWS scores in determining the necessity of non-traumatic internal medicine patient transfers to the emergency department: a longitudinal study.","authors":"Abbasali Ebrahimian, Ali Fakhr-Movahedi, Mohammad Taghi Shahcheragh, Seyyed Hossein Shahcheragh","doi":"10.1186/s12873-025-01215-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Accurate prehospital decision-making is critical in emergency care to ensure the appropriate use of resources and optimal patient outcomes. However, the alignment between emergency physicians' clinical judgments and scoring systems such as Prehospital Modified Early Warning Score (Pre-MEWS) and the modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) remains underexplored.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigates the consistency of prehospital Pre-MEWS and in-hospital mSOFA scores with emergency physicians' judgments in determining the necessity of non-traumatic Internal Medicine Patient transfers to emergency departments (EDs). Additionally, it evaluates the clinical outcomes of these transfers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this longitudinal study conducted between 2019 and 2020 in Semnan, Iran, 675 non-traumatic Internal patients transferred to a single ED were analyzed. Pre-MEWS scores were recorded prehospital, while mSOFA scores and physicians' evaluations were documented post-transfer. Outcomes included discharge, hospital admission, ICU transfer, or death.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>This study analyzed 675 non-traumatic Internal patients transferred to the emergency department, with a mean age of 55.93 ± 21.89 years. 31% of transfers were deemed unnecessary by emergency physicians. The mean length of stay was 5.63 ± 5.69 h, showing a significant correlation with higher Pre-MEWS and mSOFA scores (p < 0.0001). Based on Pre-MEWS, patients were stratified into three risk levels: Green (≤ 3, no ICU/mortality), Yellow (4-12, 3.8% ICU admissions, no deaths), and Red (≥ 13, all deceased patients). mSOFA scoring identified two risk levels: Yellow (1-5, 0% mortality, ICU risk rising to 20%) and Red (≥ 6, ICU admissions up to 100%, mortality risk reaching 676.8%). Specifically, all deceased patients had Pre-MEWS scores ≥ 13, and ICU admission was observed in 3.8% of patients with Pre-MEWS scores between 4 and 12. The mSOFA score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality and ICU admission compared to Pre-MEWS. However, Pre-MEWS provided practical utility for prehospital triage.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Combining scoring systems with clinical judgment can improve decision-making in prehospital settings. Enhanced integration of tools and expertise is recommended to reduce unnecessary transfers and optimize emergency care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9002,"journal":{"name":"BMC Emergency Medicine","volume":"25 1","pages":"58"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11993953/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12873-025-01215-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Accurate prehospital decision-making is critical in emergency care to ensure the appropriate use of resources and optimal patient outcomes. However, the alignment between emergency physicians' clinical judgments and scoring systems such as Prehospital Modified Early Warning Score (Pre-MEWS) and the modified Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (mSOFA) remains underexplored.

Objective: This study investigates the consistency of prehospital Pre-MEWS and in-hospital mSOFA scores with emergency physicians' judgments in determining the necessity of non-traumatic Internal Medicine Patient transfers to emergency departments (EDs). Additionally, it evaluates the clinical outcomes of these transfers.

Methods: In this longitudinal study conducted between 2019 and 2020 in Semnan, Iran, 675 non-traumatic Internal patients transferred to a single ED were analyzed. Pre-MEWS scores were recorded prehospital, while mSOFA scores and physicians' evaluations were documented post-transfer. Outcomes included discharge, hospital admission, ICU transfer, or death.

Results: This study analyzed 675 non-traumatic Internal patients transferred to the emergency department, with a mean age of 55.93 ± 21.89 years. 31% of transfers were deemed unnecessary by emergency physicians. The mean length of stay was 5.63 ± 5.69 h, showing a significant correlation with higher Pre-MEWS and mSOFA scores (p < 0.0001). Based on Pre-MEWS, patients were stratified into three risk levels: Green (≤ 3, no ICU/mortality), Yellow (4-12, 3.8% ICU admissions, no deaths), and Red (≥ 13, all deceased patients). mSOFA scoring identified two risk levels: Yellow (1-5, 0% mortality, ICU risk rising to 20%) and Red (≥ 6, ICU admissions up to 100%, mortality risk reaching 676.8%). Specifically, all deceased patients had Pre-MEWS scores ≥ 13, and ICU admission was observed in 3.8% of patients with Pre-MEWS scores between 4 and 12. The mSOFA score demonstrated superior predictive accuracy for mortality and ICU admission compared to Pre-MEWS. However, Pre-MEWS provided practical utility for prehospital triage.

Conclusion: Combining scoring systems with clinical judgment can improve decision-making in prehospital settings. Enhanced integration of tools and expertise is recommended to reduce unnecessary transfers and optimize emergency care.

在确定非创伤性内科病人转到急诊科的必要性时,急诊医师意见与MSOFA和PREMEWS评分的比较:一项纵向研究
背景:准确的院前决策在急诊护理中至关重要,以确保资源的合理使用和最佳的患者预后。然而,急诊医生的临床判断与院前改良早期预警评分(Pre-MEWS)和改良序期器官衰竭评估(mSOFA)等评分系统之间的一致性仍未得到充分探讨。目的:探讨院前Pre-MEWS和院内mSOFA评分与急诊医师判断非创伤性内科患者转急诊必要性的一致性。此外,它评估这些转移的临床结果。方法:在这项于2019年至2020年在伊朗Semnan进行的纵向研究中,分析了675名转移到单一急诊科的非创伤性内科患者。入院前记录mews评分,而转院后记录mSOFA评分和医生评估。结果包括出院、住院、ICU转移或死亡。结果:本研究分析了675例转至急诊科的非创伤性内科患者,平均年龄55.93±21.89岁。31%的转院被急诊医生认为是不必要的。平均住院时间为5.63±5.69 h,与较高的mews和mSOFA评分有显著相关性(p)。结论:将评分系统与临床判断相结合可以改善院前决策。建议加强工具和专业知识的整合,以减少不必要的转移和优化急诊护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Emergency Medicine
BMC Emergency Medicine Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
8.00%
发文量
178
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Emergency Medicine is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all urgent and emergency aspects of medicine, in both practice and basic research. In addition, the journal covers aspects of disaster medicine and medicine in special locations, such as conflict areas and military medicine, together with articles concerning healthcare services in the emergency departments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信