What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING
Joel Stanton, Carol Stiles, Paula Anderson, Rachel M Taylor, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Elena Ivany
{"title":"What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Joel Stanton, Carol Stiles, Paula Anderson, Rachel M Taylor, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Elena Ivany","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of evidence-based processes to support nurses in appropriately utilizing one-to-one observations for patients at risk of avoidable harm in acute hospitals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the decision-making processes surrounding one-to-one observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched in July 2020 and July 2024. Papers were included if they discussed decision-making processes for one-to-one observations for acute adult inpatients. Data were extracted to a review database and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen publications were included. The decision-making tools described were assessment tools, local processes, and clinical judgement. The most common tool was an institutional decision-making process, which often was a combination of clinical assessment and clinical action guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Various tools and processes are used to facilitate decision-making on the use of one-to-one observations but few of the tools are evidence-based.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of evidence-based processes to support nurses in appropriately utilizing one-to-one observations for patients at risk of avoidable harm in acute hospitals.

Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the decision-making processes surrounding one-to-one observations.

Methods: Five databases were searched in July 2020 and July 2024. Papers were included if they discussed decision-making processes for one-to-one observations for acute adult inpatients. Data were extracted to a review database and analyzed thematically.

Results: Sixteen publications were included. The decision-making tools described were assessment tools, local processes, and clinical judgement. The most common tool was an institutional decision-making process, which often was a combination of clinical assessment and clinical action guidance.

Conclusion: Various tools and processes are used to facilitate decision-making on the use of one-to-one observations but few of the tools are evidence-based.

护士在开始、监测和结束一对一观察时使用什么决策过程?系统评价。
背景:缺乏以证据为基础的流程来支持护士适当地利用一对一观察急性医院中有可避免伤害风险的患者。目的:本系统综述的目的是确定围绕一对一观察的决策过程。方法:于2020年7月和2024年7月检索5个数据库。如果论文讨论了急性成人住院患者一对一观察的决策过程,则纳入其中。数据被提取到综述数据库中,并按主题进行分析。结果:共纳入16篇文献。所描述的决策工具包括评估工具、局部过程和临床判断。最常见的工具是机构决策过程,通常是临床评估和临床行动指导的结合。结论:使用各种工具和过程来促进使用一对一观察的决策,但很少有工具是基于证据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信