Joel Stanton, Carol Stiles, Paula Anderson, Rachel M Taylor, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Elena Ivany
{"title":"What Decision-Making Processes Are Used by Nurses in Initiating, Monitoring, and Ending One-to-One Observations? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Joel Stanton, Carol Stiles, Paula Anderson, Rachel M Taylor, Cecilia Vindrola-Padros, Elena Ivany","doi":"10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of evidence-based processes to support nurses in appropriately utilizing one-to-one observations for patients at risk of avoidable harm in acute hospitals.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the decision-making processes surrounding one-to-one observations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Five databases were searched in July 2020 and July 2024. Papers were included if they discussed decision-making processes for one-to-one observations for acute adult inpatients. Data were extracted to a review database and analyzed thematically.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixteen publications were included. The decision-making tools described were assessment tools, local processes, and clinical judgement. The most common tool was an institutional decision-making process, which often was a combination of clinical assessment and clinical action guidance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Various tools and processes are used to facilitate decision-making on the use of one-to-one observations but few of the tools are evidence-based.</p>","PeriodicalId":16931,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing care quality","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing care quality","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000878","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: There is a lack of evidence-based processes to support nurses in appropriately utilizing one-to-one observations for patients at risk of avoidable harm in acute hospitals.
Purpose: The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the decision-making processes surrounding one-to-one observations.
Methods: Five databases were searched in July 2020 and July 2024. Papers were included if they discussed decision-making processes for one-to-one observations for acute adult inpatients. Data were extracted to a review database and analyzed thematically.
Results: Sixteen publications were included. The decision-making tools described were assessment tools, local processes, and clinical judgement. The most common tool was an institutional decision-making process, which often was a combination of clinical assessment and clinical action guidance.
Conclusion: Various tools and processes are used to facilitate decision-making on the use of one-to-one observations but few of the tools are evidence-based.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Nursing Care Quality (JNCQ) is a peer-reviewed journal that provides practicing nurses as well as nurses who have leadership roles in nursing care quality programs with useful information regarding the application of quality principles and concepts in the practice setting. The journal offers a forum for the scholarly discussion of “real world” implementation of quality activities.