Trauma Pneumonectomy: Has Survival Improved Over Two Decades?

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-23 DOI:10.1177/00031348251337164
Seema P Anandalwar, Amar Deshwar, Elizabeth Powell, Thomas Scalea, James O'Connor
{"title":"Trauma Pneumonectomy: Has Survival Improved Over Two Decades?","authors":"Seema P Anandalwar, Amar Deshwar, Elizabeth Powell, Thomas Scalea, James O'Connor","doi":"10.1177/00031348251337164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>IntroductionThe hypothesis of this study is that recent advances in mechanical cardiopulmonary support and operative management have improved survival in patients requiring a trauma pneumonectomy.MethodsRetrospective, single center study from January 2003 to December 2023 of all patients who underwent a pneumonectomy for trauma. Data collected included demographics, admission physiology, use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), and mortality, defined as early (within 24 hours of surgery) and late (>24 hours after surgery). Outcomes were compared between decades, the first decade (2003-2010) and second decade (2011-2023).ResultsTwenty patients met inclusion criteria, 9 in the first decade and 11 in the second decade. There were no differences in Injury Severity Score (ISS) (26.4 vs 34.3, <i>P</i> = 0.23). However, those in the second decade had significantly lower mean admission pH (6.89 vs 7.14, <i>P</i> = 0.01) and higher admission base deficit (19.3 vs 9.8, <i>P</i> = 0.003). The use of thoracic damage control surgery increased from 33% in the first decade to 100% in the second decade (<i>P</i> = 0.002). VV-ECMO with lung rest ventilation increased from 22% to 64% (<i>P</i> = 0.06). Overall and early mortality did not change (55.6% vs 45.5%, p-0.65 and 11% vs 36.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.09, respectively). However, late mortality was dramatically lower in the second decade compared to the first (9% vs 50%, <i>P</i> = 0.06).ConclusionEarly mortality remains high; however, the combination of thoracic damage control and early initiation of VV-ECMO may contribute to the dramatic decrease in late mortality in the second decade.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1348-1354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251337164","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThe hypothesis of this study is that recent advances in mechanical cardiopulmonary support and operative management have improved survival in patients requiring a trauma pneumonectomy.MethodsRetrospective, single center study from January 2003 to December 2023 of all patients who underwent a pneumonectomy for trauma. Data collected included demographics, admission physiology, use of venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO), and mortality, defined as early (within 24 hours of surgery) and late (>24 hours after surgery). Outcomes were compared between decades, the first decade (2003-2010) and second decade (2011-2023).ResultsTwenty patients met inclusion criteria, 9 in the first decade and 11 in the second decade. There were no differences in Injury Severity Score (ISS) (26.4 vs 34.3, P = 0.23). However, those in the second decade had significantly lower mean admission pH (6.89 vs 7.14, P = 0.01) and higher admission base deficit (19.3 vs 9.8, P = 0.003). The use of thoracic damage control surgery increased from 33% in the first decade to 100% in the second decade (P = 0.002). VV-ECMO with lung rest ventilation increased from 22% to 64% (P = 0.06). Overall and early mortality did not change (55.6% vs 45.5%, p-0.65 and 11% vs 36.3%, P = 0.09, respectively). However, late mortality was dramatically lower in the second decade compared to the first (9% vs 50%, P = 0.06).ConclusionEarly mortality remains high; however, the combination of thoracic damage control and early initiation of VV-ECMO may contribute to the dramatic decrease in late mortality in the second decade.

创伤全肺切除术:20年来生存率提高了吗?
本研究的假设是机械心肺支持和手术管理的最新进展提高了需要创伤性全肺切除术的患者的生存率。方法回顾性、单中心研究2003年1月至2023年12月所有因创伤行全肺切除术的患者。收集的数据包括人口统计学、入院生理学、静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)的使用和死亡率,定义为早期(手术24小时内)和晚期(手术后24小时内)。对第一个十年(2003-2010年)和第二个十年(2011-2023年)进行了十年间的结果比较。结果20例患者符合纳入标准,其中前10年9例,后10年11例。损伤严重程度评分(ISS)差异无统计学意义(26.4 vs 34.3, P = 0.23)。然而,第二个10年的平均入院pH值显著降低(6.89 vs 7.14, P = 0.01),入院基础赤字显著增加(19.3 vs 9.8, P = 0.003)。胸椎损伤控制手术的使用率从前10年的33%上升到后10年的100% (P = 0.002)。VV-ECMO加肺休息通气从22%增加到64% (P = 0.06)。总体死亡率和早期死亡率没有变化(分别为55.6%对45.5%,P = 0.65和11%对36.3%,P = 0.09)。然而,与第一个十年相比,第二个十年的晚期死亡率显著降低(9%对50%,P = 0.06)。结论早期死亡率居高不下;然而,结合胸部损伤控制和早期开始VV-ECMO可能有助于在第二个十年中显著降低晚期死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信