Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Abulikemu Abuduweili, Sana Khan, Edmund Appiah-Kubi, Brent A Williams, Andrew C Oehler
{"title":"Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.","authors":"Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Abulikemu Abuduweili, Sana Khan, Edmund Appiah-Kubi, Brent A Williams, Andrew C Oehler","doi":"10.1097/HCR.0000000000000943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been proven to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with cardiovascular disease. Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used to predict healthcare outcomes in various fields of medicine including CR. This systemic review aims to perform critical appraisal of existing ML-based prognosis predictive model within CR and identify key research gaps in this area.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>A systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to January 28, 2024. The data extracted included clinical features, predicted outcomes, model development, and validation as well as model performance metrics. Included studies underwent quality assessments using the IJMEDI and Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A total of 22 ML-based clinical models from 7 studies across multiple phases of CR were included. Most models were developed using smaller patient cohorts from 41 to 227, with one exception involving 2280 patients. The prediction objectives ranged from patient intention to initiate CR to graduate from outpatient CR along with interval physiological and psychological progression in CR. The best-performing ML models reported area under the receiver operating characteristics curve between 0.82 and 0.91, with sensitivity from 0.77 to 0.95, indicating good prediction capabilities. However, none of them underwent calibration or external validation. Most studies raised concerns about bias. Readiness of these models for implementation into practice is questionable. External validation of existing models and development of new models with robust methodology based on larger populations and targeting diverse clinical outcomes in CR are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":15192,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation and Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0000000000000943","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) has been proven to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with cardiovascular disease. Machine learning (ML) techniques are increasingly used to predict healthcare outcomes in various fields of medicine including CR. This systemic review aims to perform critical appraisal of existing ML-based prognosis predictive model within CR and identify key research gaps in this area.

Review methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to January 28, 2024. The data extracted included clinical features, predicted outcomes, model development, and validation as well as model performance metrics. Included studies underwent quality assessments using the IJMEDI and Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool checklist.

Summary: A total of 22 ML-based clinical models from 7 studies across multiple phases of CR were included. Most models were developed using smaller patient cohorts from 41 to 227, with one exception involving 2280 patients. The prediction objectives ranged from patient intention to initiate CR to graduate from outpatient CR along with interval physiological and psychological progression in CR. The best-performing ML models reported area under the receiver operating characteristics curve between 0.82 and 0.91, with sensitivity from 0.77 to 0.95, indicating good prediction capabilities. However, none of them underwent calibration or external validation. Most studies raised concerns about bias. Readiness of these models for implementation into practice is questionable. External validation of existing models and development of new models with robust methodology based on larger populations and targeting diverse clinical outcomes in CR are needed.

基于机器学习的心脏康复患者医疗结果预测模型:系统综述
目的:心脏康复(CR)已被证明可以降低心血管疾病患者的死亡率和发病率。机器学习(ML)技术越来越多地用于预测包括CR在内的各个医学领域的医疗结果。本系统综述旨在对CR中现有的基于ML的预后预测模型进行批判性评估,并确定该领域的关键研究空白。综述方法:系统检索Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science、谷歌Scholar等数据库自各数据库建立至2024年1月28日的文献。提取的数据包括临床特征、预测结果、模型开发和验证以及模型性能指标。纳入的研究使用IJMEDI和预测模型偏倚风险评估工具检查表进行质量评估。总结:共纳入了来自7项研究的22个基于ml的临床模型,涉及CR的多个阶段。大多数模型都是在41到227个较小的患者队列中开发的,只有一个例外,涉及2280个患者。预测目标范围从患者开始CR的意向到门诊CR的毕业,以及CR的间歇生理和心理进展。表现最好的ML模型在接受者工作特征曲线下的面积在0.82 ~ 0.91之间,灵敏度在0.77 ~ 0.95之间,表明预测能力较好。然而,它们都没有进行校准或外部验证。大多数研究都提出了对偏见的担忧。这些模型是否准备好付诸实践是值得怀疑的。需要对现有模型进行外部验证,并基于更大的人群和针对不同临床结果的CR开发具有稳健方法的新模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
34.20%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: JCRP was the first, and remains the only, professional journal dedicated to improving multidisciplinary clinical practice and expanding research evidence specific to both cardiovascular and pulmonary rehabilitation. This includes exercise testing and prescription, behavioral medicine, and cardiopulmonary risk factor management. In 2007, JCRP expanded its scope to include primary prevention of cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. JCRP publishes scientific and clinical peer-reviewed Original Investigations, Reviews, and Brief or Case Reports focused on the causes, prevention, and treatment of individuals with cardiovascular or pulmonary diseases in both a print and online-only format. Editorial features include Editorials, Invited Commentaries, Literature Updates, and Clinically-relevant Topical Updates. JCRP is the official Journal of the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation and the Canadian Association of Cardiac Rehabilitation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信