Impact of cardiopulmonary bypass flow on the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation during cardiac surgery: a randomized cross-over pilot study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Olivier Desebbe, Antoine Berna, Alexandre Joosten, Darren Raphael, Ghislain Malapert, Dimitri Rolo, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Laurent Gergele
{"title":"Impact of cardiopulmonary bypass flow on the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation during cardiac surgery: a randomized cross-over pilot study.","authors":"Olivier Desebbe, Antoine Berna, Alexandre Joosten, Darren Raphael, Ghislain Malapert, Dimitri Rolo, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Laurent Gergele","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01290-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Assessment of cerebral autoregulation is challenging under different hemodynamic conditions during cardiac surgery and must be rapidly calculated in order to optimize mean arterial pressure (MAP). Whether systemic flow during cardiopulmonary bypass impacts the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation (LLA) remains unclear. Forty patients requiring cardiac surgery were included in this randomized crossover study. Patients assigned to the conventional/high blood flow arm received 20 min of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) blood flow (2.2 L/min.m<sup>-</sup>²) followed by 20 min of high blood flow (2.8 L/min.m<sup>-</sup>²), both during aortic cross clamping. Patients assigned to the high/conventional arm received the same flows but in reverse order. During each 20-minute period, MAP was gradually increased from 40 to 90 mmHg, while PaCO<sub>2</sub>, hematocrit, depth of anesthesia, central temperature and arterial oxygen tension were kept constant. Continuous cerebral blood flow velocities of the middle cerebral artery (Fv) were monitored using transcranial doppler. Cerebral autoregulation was calculated using a Pearson's correlation coefficient (Mean flow index, Mxa) between the MAP and Fv. Mxa values were then plotted across MAP ranges. The LLA was defined as the corresponding MAP value when Mxa initially decreased and crossed the threshold value of 0.4. A mixed model, including the LLA as the dependent variable, the CPB flow and period as fixed effects and patients as a random effect was used to compare conventional and high CPB flows. Thirty-seven patients were analyzed. The LLA mean difference between groups, adjusted on the period, was - 2.8 (SE 2.4) mmHg with 95% CI [-7.8, + 2.1 mmHg], p = 0.2538). 24% of patients presented an LLA < 65 mmHg during the conventional CPB flow phase versus 35% during the high CPB flow phase. Increasing the cardiopulmonary pump flow did not decrease the LLA during cardiac surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":"571-580"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01290-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Assessment of cerebral autoregulation is challenging under different hemodynamic conditions during cardiac surgery and must be rapidly calculated in order to optimize mean arterial pressure (MAP). Whether systemic flow during cardiopulmonary bypass impacts the lower limit of cerebral autoregulation (LLA) remains unclear. Forty patients requiring cardiac surgery were included in this randomized crossover study. Patients assigned to the conventional/high blood flow arm received 20 min of conventional cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) blood flow (2.2 L/min.m-²) followed by 20 min of high blood flow (2.8 L/min.m-²), both during aortic cross clamping. Patients assigned to the high/conventional arm received the same flows but in reverse order. During each 20-minute period, MAP was gradually increased from 40 to 90 mmHg, while PaCO2, hematocrit, depth of anesthesia, central temperature and arterial oxygen tension were kept constant. Continuous cerebral blood flow velocities of the middle cerebral artery (Fv) were monitored using transcranial doppler. Cerebral autoregulation was calculated using a Pearson's correlation coefficient (Mean flow index, Mxa) between the MAP and Fv. Mxa values were then plotted across MAP ranges. The LLA was defined as the corresponding MAP value when Mxa initially decreased and crossed the threshold value of 0.4. A mixed model, including the LLA as the dependent variable, the CPB flow and period as fixed effects and patients as a random effect was used to compare conventional and high CPB flows. Thirty-seven patients were analyzed. The LLA mean difference between groups, adjusted on the period, was - 2.8 (SE 2.4) mmHg with 95% CI [-7.8, + 2.1 mmHg], p = 0.2538). 24% of patients presented an LLA < 65 mmHg during the conventional CPB flow phase versus 35% during the high CPB flow phase. Increasing the cardiopulmonary pump flow did not decrease the LLA during cardiac surgery.

心脏手术期间体外循环流量对大脑自动调节下限的影响:一项随机交叉先导研究。
在心脏手术过程中,评估不同血流动力学条件下的脑自动调节具有挑战性,必须快速计算以优化平均动脉压(MAP)。体外循环期间的全身血流是否影响大脑自动调节(LLA)的下限尚不清楚。这项随机交叉研究纳入了40例需要心脏手术的患者。在主动脉交叉夹紧期间,被分配到常规/高血流量组的患者接受了20分钟的常规体外循环(CPB)血流量(2.2 L/min.m-²),然后接受了20分钟的高血流量(2.8 L/min.m-²)。分配到高臂/常规臂的患者接受相同的血流,但顺序相反。在每20分钟的时间内,MAP由40逐渐升高至90 mmHg, PaCO2、红细胞压积、麻醉深度、中心温度和动脉血氧压保持不变。采用经颅多普勒监测大脑中动脉(Fv)连续血流速度。使用MAP和Fv之间的Pearson相关系数(平均流量指数,Mxa)计算脑自动调节。然后绘制MAP范围内的Mxa值。LLA定义为Mxa最初下降并超过阈值0.4时对应的MAP值。采用混合模型,以LLA为因变量,CPB流量和周期为固定效应,患者为随机效应,比较常规和高CPB流量。对37例患者进行了分析。经时间调整后,各组间LLA平均差异为- 2.8 (SE 2.4) mmHg, 95% CI [-7.8, + 2.1 mmHg], p = 0.2538)。24%的患者出现LLA
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信