EEG features associated with Alzheimer's disease and Frontotemporal dementia are not reflected by processed indices used in anesthesia monitoring.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Stefan Schwerin, Srdjan Z Dragovic, Julian Ostertag, Duy-Minh Nguyen, Gerhard Schneider, Matthias Kreuzer
{"title":"EEG features associated with Alzheimer's disease and Frontotemporal dementia are not reflected by processed indices used in anesthesia monitoring.","authors":"Stefan Schwerin, Srdjan Z Dragovic, Julian Ostertag, Duy-Minh Nguyen, Gerhard Schneider, Matthias Kreuzer","doi":"10.1007/s10877-025-01294-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Patients with dementia face increased risks after general anesthesia. Improved perioperative electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring techniques could aid in identifying vulnerable patients. However, current technology relies on processed indices to measure \"depth-of-anesthesia\". Analyzing OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504, we compared resting-state, eyes-closed EEG recordings of healthy controls (n = 27) with patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 35) and Frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 23). We focused on prefrontal recordings. Analysis included spectral analysis, the \"fitting-oscillations&-one-over-f\"-algorithm for aperiodic and periodic signal features, as well as calculations of openibis, permutation entropy (PeEn), spectral entropy (SpEn), and spectral edge frequency (SEF). Spectral differences were pronounced, including a higher alpha/theta-ratio of controls (2.62 [95%CI: 1.54-3.62]) compared to both AD (0.55 [95%CI: 0.26-1.92], P < 0.001, AUC: 0.765 [0.642-0.888]) and FTD (0.83 [95%CI: 0.33-1.65], P = 0.007, AUC: 0.779 [0.652-0.907]). Oscillatory peak detection within the alpha frequency band was more robust in control (versus AD: P = 0.003, Cramér's V = 0.374; versus FTD: P = 0.003, Cramér's V = 0.414). Processed index parameters did not show a clear trend. FTD was associated with a higher prefrontal openibis (95.53 [95%CI: 93.43-97.39]) than control (91.98 [95%CI: 89.46-96.27], P = 0.033, AUC: 0.717 [0.572-0.862]) and an elevated SEF (23.68 [95%CI: 14.10-25.57] Hz) compared to AD (16.60 [95%CI: 14.22-22.22] Hz, P = 0.041, AUC: 0.676 [0.532-0.821]). AD and FTD are associated with EEG baseline abnormalities, and a standard prefrontal montage, as used intraoperatively, could present a promising technical screening approach for cognitive vulnerability. However, these EEG features are obscured by processed index parameters currently used in neuroanesthesia monitoring. OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504 \"A dataset of EEG recordings from: Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal dementia and Healthy subjects\" (doi: https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds004504.v1.0.7 ).</p>","PeriodicalId":15513,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-025-01294-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Patients with dementia face increased risks after general anesthesia. Improved perioperative electroencephalogram (EEG) monitoring techniques could aid in identifying vulnerable patients. However, current technology relies on processed indices to measure "depth-of-anesthesia". Analyzing OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504, we compared resting-state, eyes-closed EEG recordings of healthy controls (n = 27) with patients diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD, n = 35) and Frontotemporal dementia (FTD, n = 23). We focused on prefrontal recordings. Analysis included spectral analysis, the "fitting-oscillations&-one-over-f"-algorithm for aperiodic and periodic signal features, as well as calculations of openibis, permutation entropy (PeEn), spectral entropy (SpEn), and spectral edge frequency (SEF). Spectral differences were pronounced, including a higher alpha/theta-ratio of controls (2.62 [95%CI: 1.54-3.62]) compared to both AD (0.55 [95%CI: 0.26-1.92], P < 0.001, AUC: 0.765 [0.642-0.888]) and FTD (0.83 [95%CI: 0.33-1.65], P = 0.007, AUC: 0.779 [0.652-0.907]). Oscillatory peak detection within the alpha frequency band was more robust in control (versus AD: P = 0.003, Cramér's V = 0.374; versus FTD: P = 0.003, Cramér's V = 0.414). Processed index parameters did not show a clear trend. FTD was associated with a higher prefrontal openibis (95.53 [95%CI: 93.43-97.39]) than control (91.98 [95%CI: 89.46-96.27], P = 0.033, AUC: 0.717 [0.572-0.862]) and an elevated SEF (23.68 [95%CI: 14.10-25.57] Hz) compared to AD (16.60 [95%CI: 14.22-22.22] Hz, P = 0.041, AUC: 0.676 [0.532-0.821]). AD and FTD are associated with EEG baseline abnormalities, and a standard prefrontal montage, as used intraoperatively, could present a promising technical screening approach for cognitive vulnerability. However, these EEG features are obscured by processed index parameters currently used in neuroanesthesia monitoring. OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504 "A dataset of EEG recordings from: Alzheimer's disease, Frontotemporal dementia and Healthy subjects" (doi: https://doi.org/10.18112/openneuro.ds004504.v1.0.7 ).

麻醉监测中使用的处理指数不能反映与阿尔茨海默病和额颞叶痴呆相关的脑电图特征。
痴呆患者在全身麻醉后风险增加。改进的围手术期脑电图(EEG)监测技术可以帮助识别脆弱的患者。然而,目前的技术依赖于加工指数来测量“麻醉深度”。通过分析OpenNeuro Dataset ds004504,我们比较了健康对照(n = 27)与诊断为阿尔茨海默病(AD, n = 35)和额颞叶痴呆(FTD, n = 23)的患者静息状态闭眼脑电图记录。我们专注于前额叶的记录。分析包括频谱分析、非周期和周期信号特征的“拟合-振荡& 1 -over-f”算法,以及openibis、置换熵(PeEn)、谱熵(SpEn)和谱边缘频率(SEF)的计算。光谱差异明显,包括对照组的α / β比(2.62 [95%CI: 1.54-3.62])高于AD (0.55 [95%CI: 0.26-1.92])
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.60%
发文量
144
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing is a clinical journal publishing papers related to technology in the fields of anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, emergency medicine, and peri-operative medicine. The journal has links with numerous specialist societies, including editorial board representatives from the European Society for Computing and Technology in Anaesthesia and Intensive Care (ESCTAIC), the Society for Technology in Anesthesia (STA), the Society for Complex Acute Illness (SCAI) and the NAVAt (NAVigating towards your Anaestheisa Targets) group. The journal publishes original papers, narrative and systematic reviews, technological notes, letters to the editor, editorial or commentary papers, and policy statements or guidelines from national or international societies. The journal encourages debate on published papers and technology, including letters commenting on previous publications or technological concerns. The journal occasionally publishes special issues with technological or clinical themes, or reports and abstracts from scientificmeetings. Special issues proposals should be sent to the Editor-in-Chief. Specific details of types of papers, and the clinical and technological content of papers considered within scope can be found in instructions for authors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信