Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Sven van den Bosch, Patricia A H Doornaert, Frank J P Hoebers, Bas Kreike, Marije R Vergeer, Ellen M Zwijnenburg, Maurice C Cox, Gerjon Hannink, Tim Dijkema, Johannes H A M Kaanders
{"title":"Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Sven van den Bosch, Patricia A H Doornaert, Frank J P Hoebers, Bas Kreike, Marije R Vergeer, Ellen M Zwijnenburg, Maurice C Cox, Gerjon Hannink, Tim Dijkema, Johannes H A M Kaanders","doi":"10.1200/JCO-24-02194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"JCO2402194"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO-24-02194","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared.

Methods: Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%.

Results: Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group.

Conclusion: This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.

减少选择性剂量在头颈部鳞状细胞癌最终放疗中的临床获益和安全性:UPGRADE-RT多中心随机对照试验
目的:头颈癌(HNC)的最终放疗(RT)具有显著的长期毒性,选择性颈部放疗(ENI)是主要因素。在这个多中心随机试验中,比较了减少和标准选择性剂量的最终放射治疗的临床获益和安全性。方法:新诊断的cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC患者在五个荷兰中心累积和治疗(最终加速放疗,5.5周内34个部分68 Gy)。同时接受化疗的患者不符合条件。ENI的剂量随机分配(2:1;剂量减少43戈瑞(对照50戈瑞)。主要结局为1年饮食正常评分。次要结局是剂量减少组2年后选择性照射淋巴结的复发,如果单侧95% CI上限超过9%,则零假设被拒绝。结果:在2016年至2022年期间,随机分配300例患者,其中295例可评估并纳入分析(减少剂量,196例,对照组,99例)。1年时,减量组的平均正常饮食评分为91.6分(95% CI, 88.5 ~ 94.7),对照组为92.6分(95% CI, 88.2 ~ 97.1)(平均差异为-1.1分[95% CI, -6.5 ~ 4.4])。减少剂量组选择性放疗淋巴结的2年复发率为4.9%(单侧95% CI上限,7.5%)。在对照组中,这是4.3%(单侧95% CI上限,7.7%)。探索性分析表明,在剂量减少组中,急性吞咽困难≥3级的发生率较低,口干相关的生活质量较好。结论:这是第二个随机对照试验,证明减少选择性剂量在HNC的最终放疗中是安全的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信