Antimicrobial effectiveness of aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts on Streptococcus mutans: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

IF 1.9 Q3 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL
Kosar Ghandehari, Marzie Boskabadi, Alireza Sarraf Shirazi, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Taraneh Movahhed
{"title":"Antimicrobial effectiveness of aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts on <i>Streptococcus mutans</i>: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.","authors":"Kosar Ghandehari, Marzie Boskabadi, Alireza Sarraf Shirazi, Masoumeh Sadeghi, Taraneh Movahhed","doi":"10.22038/AJP.2024.24314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Debates about the efficacy of herbal products in oral care have inspired researchers to conduct a large number of trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the antibacterial efficacy of aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts against <i>Streptococcus mutans</i> (SM) as the main cariogenic microorganism.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Online databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Magiran were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of herbal products against SM published up to July 2023. Meta-analyses were performed for immediate and long-term effects based on random effect model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 57 studies that met the selection criteria for systematic review, 26 were subjected to meta-analysis. Considering both immediate and long-term effects on salivary SM, aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts were significantly superior in the reduction of SM over non-herbal agents (immediate: SMD = -1.16; 95%CI: -2.03, -0.29, long-term: SMD = -0.76; 95%CI: -1.35, -0.17). However, the difference was not significant in the reduction of SM of plaque (SMD = -0.30, 95%CI: -1.25, 0.65). The subgroup analyses showed no significant difference compared to chlorhexidine (p>0.05). The overall quality of evidence was considered low based on GRADE tool.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Current evidence suggests encouraging results for herbal extracts in reduction of SM, but not over chlorhexidine. However, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend them as the first option for oral care. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to assert the safety and effectiveness of them for preventing dental caries.</p>","PeriodicalId":8677,"journal":{"name":"Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine","volume":"15 2","pages":"943-963"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12033017/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AJP.2024.24314","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Debates about the efficacy of herbal products in oral care have inspired researchers to conduct a large number of trials. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the antibacterial efficacy of aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts against Streptococcus mutans (SM) as the main cariogenic microorganism.

Materials and methods: Online databases PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Magiran were searched for randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of herbal products against SM published up to July 2023. Meta-analyses were performed for immediate and long-term effects based on random effect model.

Results: Out of 57 studies that met the selection criteria for systematic review, 26 were subjected to meta-analysis. Considering both immediate and long-term effects on salivary SM, aqueous and alcoholic herbal extracts were significantly superior in the reduction of SM over non-herbal agents (immediate: SMD = -1.16; 95%CI: -2.03, -0.29, long-term: SMD = -0.76; 95%CI: -1.35, -0.17). However, the difference was not significant in the reduction of SM of plaque (SMD = -0.30, 95%CI: -1.25, 0.65). The subgroup analyses showed no significant difference compared to chlorhexidine (p>0.05). The overall quality of evidence was considered low based on GRADE tool.

Conclusion: Current evidence suggests encouraging results for herbal extracts in reduction of SM, but not over chlorhexidine. However, there is still insufficient evidence to recommend them as the first option for oral care. High-quality randomized controlled trials are required to assert the safety and effectiveness of them for preventing dental caries.

水和酒精草药提取物对变形链球菌的抗菌效果:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:关于草药产品在口腔护理中的功效的争论激发了研究人员进行大量的试验。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估水提物和醇提物对主要致龋微生物变形链球菌(Streptococcus mutans, SM)的抗菌效果。材料和方法:检索PubMed、Scopus、Cochrane Library、Web of Science和Magiran等在线数据库,检索截至2023年7月发表的评估草药产品抗SM疗效的随机对照试验。采用随机效应模型对近期和远期效果进行meta分析。结果:在符合系统评价选择标准的57项研究中,26项研究进行了meta分析。考虑到对唾液SM的即时和长期影响,水和酒精草药提取物在减少SM方面明显优于非草药药物(即时:SMD = -1.16;95%CI: -2.03, -0.29,长期:SMD = -0.76;95%ci: -1.35, -0.17)。然而,在斑块SM减少方面差异不显著(SMD = -0.30, 95%CI: -1.25, 0.65)。亚组分析显示与氯己定比较无显著差异(p < 0.05)。基于GRADE工具,证据的总体质量被认为是低的。结论:目前的证据表明,草药提取物在减少SM方面的效果令人鼓舞,但没有超过氯己定。然而,仍然没有足够的证据推荐它们作为口腔护理的第一选择。需要高质量的随机对照试验来确定它们预防龋齿的安全性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine
Avicenna Journal of Phytomedicine CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.50%
发文量
17
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信