An Intervention to Increase Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 10.5 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Angelo E Volandes, Yuchiao Chang, Joshua R Lakin, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Charlotta Lindvall, Seth N Zupanc, Diana Martins-Welch, Maria T Carney, Edith A Burns, Jennifer Itty, Kaitlin Emmert-Tangredi, Narda J Martin, Shreya Sanghani, Jon Tilburt, Kathryn I Pollak, Aretha Delight Davis, Cynthia Garde, Michael J Barry, Areej El-Jawahri, Lisa Quintiliani, Kate Sciacca, Julie Goldman, James A Tulsky
{"title":"An Intervention to Increase Advance Care Planning Among Older Adults With Advanced Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Angelo E Volandes, Yuchiao Chang, Joshua R Lakin, Michael K Paasche-Orlow, Charlotta Lindvall, Seth N Zupanc, Diana Martins-Welch, Maria T Carney, Edith A Burns, Jennifer Itty, Kaitlin Emmert-Tangredi, Narda J Martin, Shreya Sanghani, Jon Tilburt, Kathryn I Pollak, Aretha Delight Davis, Cynthia Garde, Michael J Barry, Areej El-Jawahri, Lisa Quintiliani, Kate Sciacca, Julie Goldman, James A Tulsky","doi":"10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Many older adults with advanced cancer never communicate goals of care or treatment preferences to their clinicians, raising the risk that care received will not match their values. Scalable models of care may help surmount this barrier.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To test whether a combined patient and clinician intervention increased the rate of advance care planning (ACP) documentation in large health care systems.</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial using an open cohort design included patients aged 65 years or older with advanced cancer seen at oncology clinics in 3 health care systems located in the US South, Midwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions from April 1, 2020, to November 30, 2022. Data collection ended in 2024.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The intervention involved delivering brief evidence-based patient-facing video decision aids available in 25 languages as well as goals-of-care communication training to oncology clinicians. Patients in the control period received usual care.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The primary outcome was ACP documentation, which included any electronic health record documentation of a goals-of-care conversation, palliative care, hospice, or limitation of life-sustaining treatments, identified via a validated natural language processing program. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty-nine practices, comprising 13 800 unique eligible patients with a total of 29 357 repeated measurements, were included (mean [SD] age, 74.5 [6.6] years; 52.3% men [15 344 of 29 357 measurements]). The proportion of patients with ACP documentation was greater in the intervention phase compared with the usual care phase (adjusted rate difference, 6.8% [95% CI, 2.8%-10.8%]; P < .001). ACP documentation in the intervention phase occurred among 3980 of 15 754 patients (25.3%) (goals-of-care conversation, 21.4% [3377 of 15 754]; palliative care, 9.6% [1517 of 15 754]; hospice, 5.4% [847 of 15 754]; and limitation of life-sustaining treatments, 7.2% [1128 of 15 754]). In comparison, ACP documentation in the usual care phase occurred among 2834 of 13 603 patients (20.8%) (goals-of-care conversation, 16.8% [2281 of 13 603]; palliative care, 9.5% [1287 of 13 603]; hospice, 5.3% [724 of 13 603]; and limitation of life-sustaining treatments, 8.4% [1149 of 13 603]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial for older adults with advanced cancer, a bundled evidence-based decision aid and communication training intervention increased the proportion of older patients with ACP documentation. This approach offers an innovative paradigm with a clinically meaningful increase in ACP documentation, a widely used quality metric that reflects high-quality patient-centered care delivery.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03609177.</p>","PeriodicalId":14694,"journal":{"name":"JAMA Network Open","volume":"8 5","pages":"e259150"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12065034/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA Network Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.9150","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Many older adults with advanced cancer never communicate goals of care or treatment preferences to their clinicians, raising the risk that care received will not match their values. Scalable models of care may help surmount this barrier.

Objective: To test whether a combined patient and clinician intervention increased the rate of advance care planning (ACP) documentation in large health care systems.

Design, setting, and participants: This stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial using an open cohort design included patients aged 65 years or older with advanced cancer seen at oncology clinics in 3 health care systems located in the US South, Midwest, and Mid-Atlantic regions from April 1, 2020, to November 30, 2022. Data collection ended in 2024.

Intervention: The intervention involved delivering brief evidence-based patient-facing video decision aids available in 25 languages as well as goals-of-care communication training to oncology clinicians. Patients in the control period received usual care.

Main outcomes and measures: The primary outcome was ACP documentation, which included any electronic health record documentation of a goals-of-care conversation, palliative care, hospice, or limitation of life-sustaining treatments, identified via a validated natural language processing program. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis.

Results: Twenty-nine practices, comprising 13 800 unique eligible patients with a total of 29 357 repeated measurements, were included (mean [SD] age, 74.5 [6.6] years; 52.3% men [15 344 of 29 357 measurements]). The proportion of patients with ACP documentation was greater in the intervention phase compared with the usual care phase (adjusted rate difference, 6.8% [95% CI, 2.8%-10.8%]; P < .001). ACP documentation in the intervention phase occurred among 3980 of 15 754 patients (25.3%) (goals-of-care conversation, 21.4% [3377 of 15 754]; palliative care, 9.6% [1517 of 15 754]; hospice, 5.4% [847 of 15 754]; and limitation of life-sustaining treatments, 7.2% [1128 of 15 754]). In comparison, ACP documentation in the usual care phase occurred among 2834 of 13 603 patients (20.8%) (goals-of-care conversation, 16.8% [2281 of 13 603]; palliative care, 9.5% [1287 of 13 603]; hospice, 5.3% [724 of 13 603]; and limitation of life-sustaining treatments, 8.4% [1149 of 13 603]).

Conclusions and relevance: In this stepped-wedge cluster randomized clinical trial for older adults with advanced cancer, a bundled evidence-based decision aid and communication training intervention increased the proportion of older patients with ACP documentation. This approach offers an innovative paradigm with a clinically meaningful increase in ACP documentation, a widely used quality metric that reflects high-quality patient-centered care delivery.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03609177.

一项增加老年晚期癌症患者提前护理计划的干预:一项随机临床试验。
重要性:许多患有晚期癌症的老年人从未与他们的临床医生沟通过护理目标或治疗偏好,这增加了所接受的护理与他们的价值观不符的风险。可扩展的护理模式可能有助于克服这一障碍。目的:检验在大型卫生保健系统中,患者和临床医生联合干预是否增加了预先护理计划(ACP)记录的比率。设计、环境和参与者:这项采用开放队列设计的楔形分群随机临床试验纳入了2020年4月1日至2022年11月30日期间在美国南部、中西部和大西洋中部地区3个医疗保健系统肿瘤诊所就诊的65岁及以上晚期癌症患者。数据收集于2024年结束。干预:干预包括以25种语言提供简短的基于证据的面向患者的视频决策辅助工具,以及向肿瘤临床医生提供护理目标沟通培训。对照组患者接受常规护理。主要结果和措施:主要结果是ACP文件,包括任何电子健康记录文件,通过经过验证的自然语言处理程序识别的护理目标对话,姑息治疗,临终关怀或限制生命维持治疗。在意向治疗基础上进行分析。结果:纳入29个实践,包括13 800名独特的符合条件的患者,共29 357次重复测量(平均[SD]年龄74.5[6.6]岁;52.3%男性[15 344 / 29 357次测量])。与常规护理阶段相比,在干预阶段有ACP记录的患者比例更高(调整后的比率差异为6.8% [95% CI, 2.8%-10.8%];P < 0.001)。15 754例患者中有3980例(25.3%)在干预阶段有ACP记录(护理目标对话,21.4%[15 754中的3377例];姑息治疗占9.6%[1517 / 15 754];临终关怀,5.4%[847 / 15 754];生命维持治疗的局限性,7.2%[1128 / 15 754])。相比之下,13 603例患者中有2834例(20.8%)在常规护理阶段有ACP记录(护理目标对话,16.8%[13 603中的2281];姑息治疗占9.5%[13例中的1287例 603];临终关怀,5.3%[13个中的724个 603];生命维持治疗的局限性,8.4%[1149 / 13 603])。结论和相关性:在这项针对老年晚期癌症患者的楔形分组随机临床试验中,基于证据的决策辅助和沟通培训干预增加了老年ACP患者的比例。这种方法提供了一种创新的范例,具有临床意义的ACP文件增加,这是一种广泛使用的质量指标,反映了高质量的以患者为中心的护理交付。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT03609177。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA Network Open
JAMA Network Open Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
16.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
2126
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMA Network Open, a member of the esteemed JAMA Network, stands as an international, peer-reviewed, open-access general medical journal.The publication is dedicated to disseminating research across various health disciplines and countries, encompassing clinical care, innovation in health care, health policy, and global health. JAMA Network Open caters to clinicians, investigators, and policymakers, providing a platform for valuable insights and advancements in the medical field. As part of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed general medical and specialty publications, JAMA Network Open contributes to the collective knowledge and understanding within the medical community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信