Unveiling the Impact of Reciprocal Changes in Thoracic Kyphosis After Staged Corrective Surgery in Adult Deformity.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Yuan-Shun Lo, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Yi-Hsun Huang, Hung-Lun Hsieh, Chen-Wei Yeh, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Cheng-Hung Chiang, Chun-Hao Tsai, Yi-Chin Fong, Yen-Jen Chen, Hsien-Te Chen, Xue-Peng Wei
{"title":"Unveiling the Impact of Reciprocal Changes in Thoracic Kyphosis After Staged Corrective Surgery in Adult Deformity.","authors":"Yuan-Shun Lo, Erh-Ti Ernest Lin, Yi-Hsun Huang, Hung-Lun Hsieh, Chen-Wei Yeh, Michael Jian-Wen Chen, Cheng-Hung Chiang, Chun-Hao Tsai, Yi-Chin Fong, Yen-Jen Chen, Hsien-Te Chen, Xue-Peng Wei","doi":"10.1177/21925682251340606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveReciprocal changes (RCs) in unfused spinal segments can significantly affect the global alignment after corrective surgery. Identifying radiographic thresholds for guiding surgical strategies is critical for optimizing the outcomes.Materials and MethodsNinety-eight ASD patients who underwent staged surgeries, including lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), were analyzed. According to the final follow-up image, the patients were classified into balanced (BG) and imbalanced (IG) groups, with IG further stratified into proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (IG-PJK/PJF) and non-PJK/PJF (IG-NPJK/PJF). Radiographic and clinical data were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 2-year follow-up.ResultsThe IG exhibited greater RCs in thoracic kyphosis (TK) and PI-LL mismatch from postoperative to follow-up than the BG (<i>P</i> = .030, <i>P</i> = .008). Significant predictors included Age >65.5 y/o (AUC: .672) and Post-PT >17.5° (AUC: .852) for imbalance and Post-TK >34.5° (AUC: .755) for IG-PJK/PJF. IG-PJK/PJF showed poorer ODI scores than BG and IG-NPJK/PJF (<i>P</i> = .021 and <i>P</i> = .022, respectively). IG-PJK/PJF showed poorer total SRS-22 scores than IG-NPJK/PJF (<i>P</i> = .021).ConclusionIncreased RCs in TK was associated with adverse outcomes. Extending the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to the upper thoracic spine and addressing excessive TK (>34.5°) may improve alignment and reduce complications. Radiographic thresholds can provide actionable guidance in surgical planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12680,"journal":{"name":"Global Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":"21925682251340606"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12049368/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/21925682251340606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.ObjectiveReciprocal changes (RCs) in unfused spinal segments can significantly affect the global alignment after corrective surgery. Identifying radiographic thresholds for guiding surgical strategies is critical for optimizing the outcomes.Materials and MethodsNinety-eight ASD patients who underwent staged surgeries, including lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and posterior spinal fusion (PSF), were analyzed. According to the final follow-up image, the patients were classified into balanced (BG) and imbalanced (IG) groups, with IG further stratified into proximal junctional kyphosis/failure (IG-PJK/PJF) and non-PJK/PJF (IG-NPJK/PJF). Radiographic and clinical data were collected preoperatively, postoperatively, and at 2-year follow-up.ResultsThe IG exhibited greater RCs in thoracic kyphosis (TK) and PI-LL mismatch from postoperative to follow-up than the BG (P = .030, P = .008). Significant predictors included Age >65.5 y/o (AUC: .672) and Post-PT >17.5° (AUC: .852) for imbalance and Post-TK >34.5° (AUC: .755) for IG-PJK/PJF. IG-PJK/PJF showed poorer ODI scores than BG and IG-NPJK/PJF (P = .021 and P = .022, respectively). IG-PJK/PJF showed poorer total SRS-22 scores than IG-NPJK/PJF (P = .021).ConclusionIncreased RCs in TK was associated with adverse outcomes. Extending the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) to the upper thoracic spine and addressing excessive TK (>34.5°) may improve alignment and reduce complications. Radiographic thresholds can provide actionable guidance in surgical planning.

揭示成人畸形分期矫正手术后胸部后凸的相互改变的影响。
研究设计回顾性队列研究。目的脊柱未融合节段的互变(RCs)对脊柱矫形术后整体对准有显著影响。确定放射学阈值以指导手术策略对于优化结果至关重要。材料与方法对98例ASD患者进行分阶段手术,包括侧位腰椎体间融合术(LLIF)和后路脊柱融合术(PSF)。根据最终随访图像,将患者分为平衡(BG)组和不平衡(IG)组,IG组进一步分为近端关节后凸/失稳(IG- pjk /PJF)和非pjk /PJF (IG- npjk /PJF)。术前、术后及2年随访收集影像学及临床资料。结果IG组术后至随访期间胸后凸(TK)和PI-LL失配的RCs高于BG组(P = 0.030, P = 0.008)。eg - pjk /PJF的显著预测因子为Age >65.5 y/o (AUC: 0.672), pt后>17.5°(AUC: 0.852), tk后>34.5°(AUC: 0.755)。IG-PJK/PJF的ODI评分低于BG和IG-NPJK/PJF (P = 0.021和P = 0.022)。IG-PJK/PJF的SRS-22总分低于IG-NPJK/PJF (P = 0.021)。结论TK患者RCs升高与不良结局相关。将上固定椎体(UIV)延伸至上胸椎并处理过度的TK(>34.5°)可改善椎体对齐并减少并发症。放射学阈值可以为手术计划提供可行的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Spine Journal
Global Spine Journal Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
278
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Global Spine Journal (GSJ) is the official scientific publication of AOSpine. A peer-reviewed, open access journal, devoted to the study and treatment of spinal disorders, including diagnosis, operative and non-operative treatment options, surgical techniques, and emerging research and clinical developments.GSJ is indexed in PubMedCentral, SCOPUS, and Emerging Sources Citation Index (ESCI).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信