Effect of the discrepancy between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative disk wedging below the lower instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study in Japan.
{"title":"Effect of the discrepancy between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative disk wedging below the lower instrumented vertebra in patients with Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study in Japan.","authors":"Takahito Iga, Satoshi Suzuki, Kazuki Takeda, Toshiki Okubo, Masahiro Ozaki, Osahiko Tsuji, Narihito Nagoshi, Morio Matsumoto, Masaya Nakamura, Kota Watanabe","doi":"10.31616/asj.2024.0445","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To evaluate the effect of discrepancies between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative disk wedging below the lower instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Previous studies have not fully explored the effect of discrepancies between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative outcomes in patients with Lenke type 5 AIS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from 35 patients with Lenke type 5 AIS (mean age, 14.7±1.8 years) followed for a minimum of 5 years were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the effect of sacral coronal obliquity (S angle) and pelvic coronal obliquity (P angle) on postoperative coronal radiographic parameters. The angle between the S and P angles was defined as the sacral and pelvic (SP) angle. The patients were grouped by preoperative SP angle (<5°, n=23; ≥5°, n=12). Pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters were compared to determine whether the preoperative SP angle affected postoperative spinal alignment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The discrepancy between SP obliquity was reduced by correction surgery 5 years postoperatively. The mean lumbar Cobb angle correction rate in the ≥5° group was significantly lower than that in the <5° group (52.1%±17.8% vs. 65.5%±12.7%), and the mean wedge angle below the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in the ≥5° group was significantly larger than that in the <5° group (9.0°±2.6° vs. 4.7°±3.4°) 5 years postoperatively. No significant between-group differences were observed in age, Risser grade, thoracic Cobb angle correction rate, LIV-central sacral vertical line (CSVL), and C7-CSVL. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcomes were comparable between the two groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ≥5° group exhibited a larger wedge angle below the LIV and lower lumbar Cobb angle correction rate than the <5° group 5 years postoperatively. Preoperative discrepancies between SP obliquity should be considered when planning corrective surgery for patients with Lenke type 5 AIS.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2024.0445","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Study design: Retrospective cohort study.
Purpose: To evaluate the effect of discrepancies between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative disk wedging below the lower instrumented vertebra in Lenke type 5 adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).
Overview of literature: Previous studies have not fully explored the effect of discrepancies between sacral and pelvic obliquity on postoperative outcomes in patients with Lenke type 5 AIS.
Methods: Data from 35 patients with Lenke type 5 AIS (mean age, 14.7±1.8 years) followed for a minimum of 5 years were retrospectively analyzed. We investigated the effect of sacral coronal obliquity (S angle) and pelvic coronal obliquity (P angle) on postoperative coronal radiographic parameters. The angle between the S and P angles was defined as the sacral and pelvic (SP) angle. The patients were grouped by preoperative SP angle (<5°, n=23; ≥5°, n=12). Pre- and post-operative radiographic parameters were compared to determine whether the preoperative SP angle affected postoperative spinal alignment.
Results: The discrepancy between SP obliquity was reduced by correction surgery 5 years postoperatively. The mean lumbar Cobb angle correction rate in the ≥5° group was significantly lower than that in the <5° group (52.1%±17.8% vs. 65.5%±12.7%), and the mean wedge angle below the lower instrumented vertebra (LIV) in the ≥5° group was significantly larger than that in the <5° group (9.0°±2.6° vs. 4.7°±3.4°) 5 years postoperatively. No significant between-group differences were observed in age, Risser grade, thoracic Cobb angle correction rate, LIV-central sacral vertical line (CSVL), and C7-CSVL. The Scoliosis Research Society-22 outcomes were comparable between the two groups.
Conclusions: The ≥5° group exhibited a larger wedge angle below the LIV and lower lumbar Cobb angle correction rate than the <5° group 5 years postoperatively. Preoperative discrepancies between SP obliquity should be considered when planning corrective surgery for patients with Lenke type 5 AIS.