Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.

IF 3.4 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler
{"title":"Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.","authors":"Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.

乳腺癌筛查中自我报告检查指征的准确性。
与电子健康记录(EHR)相比,我们验证了更新的国家健康访谈调查中关于乳房x光检查适应症的问题。我们询问了244名年龄在40-74岁、符合乳腺癌筛查条件的华盛顿凯撒医疗机构成员,使用一系列新的分层是/否问题,让他们自我报告最近一次乳房x光检查的原因。我们首先询问他们是否因为健康问题而进行乳房x光检查,然后作为后续检查,最后进行筛查。我们将自我报告的原因与两个EHR数据集进行了比较:程序/诊断代码和放射科医生定义的适应症。健康问题的自我报告检查与规范的一致性为89.2%,与放射科医生定义的适应症的一致性为92.2%。自我报告的随访检查与符码的一致性为87.5%,与放射科医师定义的适应症的一致性为89.3%。自我报告的筛查检查与符码的一致性为91.4%,与放射科医师定义的适应症的一致性为95.7%。当使用这种新颖的分层方法询问时,自我报告的乳房x光检查指征与程序/诊断代码和放射科医生报告的指征有很好的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JNCI Cancer Spectrum
JNCI Cancer Spectrum Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信