Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler
{"title":"Accuracy of self-reported exam indications for breast cancer screening.","authors":"Erin J Aiello Bowles, Hongyuan Gao, Lynn E Fleckenstein, Perla Bravo, Michael G Nash, Bryan Comstock, Chris Neslund-Dudas, Jin Mou, Larry G Kessler","doi":"10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":14681,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Cancer Spectrum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jncics/pkaf046","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We validated updated National Health Interview Survey questions on mammography indications compared to electronic health records (EHR). We asked 244 Kaiser Permanente Washington members ages 40-74 years and eligible for breast cancer screening to self-report their most recent mammogram reason using a series of new hierarchical yes/no questions. We first asked if they had the mammogram because of a health problem, then as a follow-up test, and last for screening. We compared self-reported reasons to two EHR datasets: procedure/diagnostic codes, and radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for a health problem had 89.2% agreement with codes and 92.2% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for follow-up had 87.5% agreement with codes, and 89.3% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported exams for screening had 91.4% agreement with codes, and 95.7% agreement with radiologist-defined indications. Self-reported mammogram indications have good agreement with procedure/diagnostic codes and radiologist-reported indications, when asked using this novel hierarchical approach.