Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5T MR-Linac adapt-to-shape workflow

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Jiayi Liang, Eric Aliotta, Neelam Tyagi, Paola Godoy Scripes, Nicolas Côté, Ergys Subashi, Qijie Huang, Lian Sun, Ching-Yun Chan, Angela Ng, Theresa Wunner, Victoria Brennan, Kaveh Zakeri, James Mechalakos
{"title":"Risk analysis of the Unity 1.5T MR-Linac adapt-to-shape workflow","authors":"Jiayi Liang,&nbsp;Eric Aliotta,&nbsp;Neelam Tyagi,&nbsp;Paola Godoy Scripes,&nbsp;Nicolas Côté,&nbsp;Ergys Subashi,&nbsp;Qijie Huang,&nbsp;Lian Sun,&nbsp;Ching-Yun Chan,&nbsp;Angela Ng,&nbsp;Theresa Wunner,&nbsp;Victoria Brennan,&nbsp;Kaveh Zakeri,&nbsp;James Mechalakos","doi":"10.1002/acm2.70095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background and Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>The adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) allows for full replanning including recontouring and reoptimization<sup>5</sup>. Additional complexity to this workflow is added when the adaptation involves the use of MIM Maestro (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH) software in conjunction with Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Given the interplay of various systems and the inherent complexity of the ATS workflow, a risk analysis would be instructive.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) following Task Group 100<sup>13</sup> was completed to evaluate the ATS workflow. A multi-disciplinary team was formed for this analysis. The team created a process map detailing the steps involved in ATS treating both the standard Monaco workflow and a workflow with the use of MIM software in parallel. From this, failure modes were identified, scored using three categories (likelihood of occurrence, severity, and detectability which multiplied create a risk priority number), and then mitigations for the top 20<sup>th</sup> percentile of failure modes were found.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Risk analysis found 264 failure modes in the ATS workflow. Of those, 82 were high-ranking failure modes that ranked in the top 20<sup>th</sup> percentile for risk priority number and severity scores. Although high-ranking failure modes were identified in each step in the process, 62 of them were found in the contouring and planning steps, highlighting key differences from adapt-to-position (ATP), where the importance of these steps are minimized. Mitigations are suggested for all high-ranking failure modes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The flexibility of the ATS workflow, which enables reoptimization of the treatment plan, also introduces potential critical points where errors can occur. There are more opportunities for error in ATS that can create unintentionally negative dosimetric impact. FMEA can help mitigate these risks by identifying and addressing potential failure points in the ATS process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14989,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","volume":"26 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/acm2.70095","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acm2.70095","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose

The adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflow on the Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) allows for full replanning including recontouring and reoptimization5. Additional complexity to this workflow is added when the adaptation involves the use of MIM Maestro (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH) software in conjunction with Monaco (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden). Given the interplay of various systems and the inherent complexity of the ATS workflow, a risk analysis would be instructive.

Method

Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) following Task Group 10013 was completed to evaluate the ATS workflow. A multi-disciplinary team was formed for this analysis. The team created a process map detailing the steps involved in ATS treating both the standard Monaco workflow and a workflow with the use of MIM software in parallel. From this, failure modes were identified, scored using three categories (likelihood of occurrence, severity, and detectability which multiplied create a risk priority number), and then mitigations for the top 20th percentile of failure modes were found.

Results

Risk analysis found 264 failure modes in the ATS workflow. Of those, 82 were high-ranking failure modes that ranked in the top 20th percentile for risk priority number and severity scores. Although high-ranking failure modes were identified in each step in the process, 62 of them were found in the contouring and planning steps, highlighting key differences from adapt-to-position (ATP), where the importance of these steps are minimized. Mitigations are suggested for all high-ranking failure modes.

Conclusion

The flexibility of the ATS workflow, which enables reoptimization of the treatment plan, also introduces potential critical points where errors can occur. There are more opportunities for error in ATS that can create unintentionally negative dosimetric impact. FMEA can help mitigate these risks by identifying and addressing potential failure points in the ATS process.

Abstract Image

Unity 1.5T MR-Linac自适应成型工作流程风险分析
背景和目的:在Unity MR-Linac (Elekta AB,斯德哥尔摩,瑞典)上的适应形状(ATS)工作流程允许完全重新规划,包括重新轮廓和重新优化5。当适应涉及到与摩纳哥(Elekta AB,瑞典斯德哥尔摩)一起使用MIM Maestro (MIM Software, Cleveland, OH)软件时,会增加此工作流程的额外复杂性。鉴于各种系统的相互作用和ATS工作流程的内在复杂性,风险分析将是有益的。方法:按照任务组10013完成失效模式和影响分析(FMEA),对ATS工作流程进行评估。为此,成立了一个多学科团队。该团队创建了一个流程图,详细说明了ATS处理标准摩纳哥工作流程和并行使用MIM软件的工作流程所涉及的步骤。由此,确定故障模式,使用三个类别(发生的可能性、严重性和可检测性,它们相乘产生风险优先级数字)进行评分,然后找到故障模式的前20个百分位数的缓解措施。结果:风险分析发现ATS工作流程存在264种失效模式。其中,82个是高级故障模式,在风险优先级和严重程度评分中排名前20个百分位数。虽然在过程的每个步骤中都确定了高级失效模式,但在轮廓和规划步骤中发现了62个失效模式,突出了与位置适应(ATP)的关键区别,其中这些步骤的重要性最小化。建议针对所有高级故障模式采取缓解措施。结论:ATS工作流程的灵活性,使治疗计划能够重新优化,也引入了可能发生错误的潜在临界点。ATS中出现错误的可能性更大,可能会无意中产生负面的剂量学影响。FMEA可以通过识别和解决ATS过程中的潜在故障点来帮助减轻这些风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
19.00%
发文量
331
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is an international Open Access publication dedicated to clinical medical physics. JACMP welcomes original contributions dealing with all aspects of medical physics from scientists working in the clinical medical physics around the world. JACMP accepts only online submission. JACMP will publish: -Original Contributions: Peer-reviewed, investigations that represent new and significant contributions to the field. Recommended word count: up to 7500. -Review Articles: Reviews of major areas or sub-areas in the field of clinical medical physics. These articles may be of any length and are peer reviewed. -Technical Notes: These should be no longer than 3000 words, including key references. -Letters to the Editor: Comments on papers published in JACMP or on any other matters of interest to clinical medical physics. These should not be more than 1250 (including the literature) and their publication is only based on the decision of the editor, who occasionally asks experts on the merit of the contents. -Book Reviews: The editorial office solicits Book Reviews. -Announcements of Forthcoming Meetings: The Editor may provide notice of forthcoming meetings, course offerings, and other events relevant to clinical medical physics. -Parallel Opposed Editorial: We welcome topics relevant to clinical practice and medical physics profession. The contents can be controversial debate or opposed aspects of an issue. One author argues for the position and the other against. Each side of the debate contains an opening statement up to 800 words, followed by a rebuttal up to 500 words. Readers interested in participating in this series should contact the moderator with a proposed title and a short description of the topic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信