A single-centre analysis of a biosimilar switching programme for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Louise Rabbitt, Áine Keogh, Linda Duane, John Ferguson, Anna Hobbins, Brian E McGuire, Patrick Gillespie, Laurence J Egan
{"title":"A single-centre analysis of a biosimilar switching programme for adalimumab in inflammatory bowel disease.","authors":"Louise Rabbitt, Áine Keogh, Linda Duane, John Ferguson, Anna Hobbins, Brian E McGuire, Patrick Gillespie, Laurence J Egan","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70086","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Amgevita is a licensed biosimilar to adalimumab, having demonstrated high pharmacokinetic and clinical similarity to Humira. Switching to a lower-cost medicine may elicit a nocebo effect, whereby expectations of poorer efficacy impact outcomes despite pharmacological similarity. This prospective cohort study examined clinical and economic outcomes and associated psychosocial variables in a group of patients undergoing a nonmedical switch to biosimilar adalimumab.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were followed before and after switching from Humira to Amgevita. Objective disease activity was assessed pre- and post-switch using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (Crohn's disease) or partial Mayo score (ulcerative colitis), faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein. Subjective symptom burden was measured using the IBD Control Questionnaire (IBDCQ). Pre-switch, health anxiety was measured using the Health Anxiety Index (HAI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 64 patients aged 18-67 were enrolled. IBDCQ scores marginally improved post-switch (13.33 vs, 12.49, P = .043), with no significant changes in objective disease activity scores, faecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein. Sixteen patients reported 17 new adverse events within 4 weeks. Logistic regression revealed a significant relationship between HAI scores and adverse events (P = .0079); each unit increase in HAI score increased the odds of reporting an adverse event by 21%. Drug cost savings for the 64 patients over 8 weeks totalled €143 958.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Switching to biosimilar adalimumab did not affect disease control or quality of life. 25% of patients developed new side effects, particularly those with high levels of health anxiety. Significant cost savings were achieved.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70086","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Amgevita is a licensed biosimilar to adalimumab, having demonstrated high pharmacokinetic and clinical similarity to Humira. Switching to a lower-cost medicine may elicit a nocebo effect, whereby expectations of poorer efficacy impact outcomes despite pharmacological similarity. This prospective cohort study examined clinical and economic outcomes and associated psychosocial variables in a group of patients undergoing a nonmedical switch to biosimilar adalimumab.

Methods: Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) were followed before and after switching from Humira to Amgevita. Objective disease activity was assessed pre- and post-switch using the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (Crohn's disease) or partial Mayo score (ulcerative colitis), faecal calprotectin and C-reactive protein. Subjective symptom burden was measured using the IBD Control Questionnaire (IBDCQ). Pre-switch, health anxiety was measured using the Health Anxiety Index (HAI).

Results: In total, 64 patients aged 18-67 were enrolled. IBDCQ scores marginally improved post-switch (13.33 vs, 12.49, P = .043), with no significant changes in objective disease activity scores, faecal calprotectin or C-reactive protein. Sixteen patients reported 17 new adverse events within 4 weeks. Logistic regression revealed a significant relationship between HAI scores and adverse events (P = .0079); each unit increase in HAI score increased the odds of reporting an adverse event by 21%. Drug cost savings for the 64 patients over 8 weeks totalled €143 958.

Conclusion: Switching to biosimilar adalimumab did not affect disease control or quality of life. 25% of patients developed new side effects, particularly those with high levels of health anxiety. Significant cost savings were achieved.

阿达木单抗治疗炎症性肠病的生物仿制药转换项目的单中心分析
目的:Amgevita是阿达木单抗的获批生物仿制药,与Humira具有很高的药代动力学和临床相似性。转而使用成本较低的药物可能会引发反安慰剂效应,即尽管药理学相似,但对较差疗效的预期会影响结果。这项前瞻性队列研究检查了一组接受阿达木单抗生物仿制药非医学转换的患者的临床和经济结果以及相关的社会心理变量。方法:对炎症性肠病(IBD)患者从修美乐转为安吉维他前后进行随访。使用Harvey-Bradshaw指数(克罗恩病)或部分Mayo评分(溃疡性结肠炎)、粪便钙保护蛋白和c反应蛋白评估转换前后的疾病活动性。采用IBD控制问卷(IBDCQ)测量主观症状负担。转换前,使用健康焦虑指数(HAI)测量健康焦虑。结果:共纳入64例患者,年龄18-67岁。切换后IBDCQ评分略有改善(13.33 vs 12.49, P = 0.043),客观疾病活动性评分、粪便钙保护蛋白或c反应蛋白无显著变化。16例患者在4周内报告了17例新的不良事件。Logistic回归分析显示,不良事件与HAI评分之间存在显著相关(P = 0.0079);HAI评分每增加一个单位,报告不良事件的几率增加21%。64名患者在8周内节省的药费总计143958欧元。结论:切换到阿达木单抗生物仿制药不影响疾病控制或生活质量。25%的患者出现了新的副作用,特别是那些健康焦虑程度很高的患者。实现了显著的成本节约。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信