Towards greener prescribing? Swedish general practitioners' support for policies to reduce pharmaceutical pollution.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Johanna Villén, Johanna Laux, Björn Wettermark, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Marmar Nekoro, Helle Håkonsen
{"title":"Towards greener prescribing? Swedish general practitioners' support for policies to reduce pharmaceutical pollution.","authors":"Johanna Villén, Johanna Laux, Björn Wettermark, Sofia Kälvemark Sporrong, Marmar Nekoro, Helle Håkonsen","doi":"10.1002/bcp.70066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Prescribing pharmaceuticals is essential to improve health, but it also has substantial environmental impact. This study investigated the extent to which Swedish general practitioners (GPs) are willing to integrate environmental aspects into treatment decisions and their opinions on policies to reduce pharmaceutical pollution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire assessing environmental considerations in prescribing was developed and distributed to 1233 Swedish GPs and physicians in training (response rate: 22%) between September 2023 and June 2024. It included 3 patient cases to assess trade-offs between therapeutic effect and environmental impact of pharmaceuticals used for pain management, blood pressure reduction, and contraception. Questions about attitudes to policies to reduce the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals were also included. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Most respondents were willing to prescribe a less effective pharmaceutical if it was environmentally preferable, 77% for pain management and blood pressure reduction, and 50% for contraception. Environmental impact was ranked as the least important factor in prescribing decisions when compared to cost, regional treatment guidelines, dosage intervals, and user-friendliness. A total of 68% of respondents agreed that physicians should consider environmental aspects when prescribing, however only a few often searched for environmental information when prescribing. Policies directed towards other stakeholders, such as authorities and the pharmaceutical industry, received substantial support.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swedish GPs are willing to consider environmental factors when prescribing. However, other factors are more often considered and GPs attribute higher responsibility to other actors. Improving access to environmental information about pharmaceuticals could support greener prescribing.</p>","PeriodicalId":9251,"journal":{"name":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of clinical pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/bcp.70066","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: Prescribing pharmaceuticals is essential to improve health, but it also has substantial environmental impact. This study investigated the extent to which Swedish general practitioners (GPs) are willing to integrate environmental aspects into treatment decisions and their opinions on policies to reduce pharmaceutical pollution.

Methods: A questionnaire assessing environmental considerations in prescribing was developed and distributed to 1233 Swedish GPs and physicians in training (response rate: 22%) between September 2023 and June 2024. It included 3 patient cases to assess trade-offs between therapeutic effect and environmental impact of pharmaceuticals used for pain management, blood pressure reduction, and contraception. Questions about attitudes to policies to reduce the environmental impact of pharmaceuticals were also included. Data were analysed using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: Most respondents were willing to prescribe a less effective pharmaceutical if it was environmentally preferable, 77% for pain management and blood pressure reduction, and 50% for contraception. Environmental impact was ranked as the least important factor in prescribing decisions when compared to cost, regional treatment guidelines, dosage intervals, and user-friendliness. A total of 68% of respondents agreed that physicians should consider environmental aspects when prescribing, however only a few often searched for environmental information when prescribing. Policies directed towards other stakeholders, such as authorities and the pharmaceutical industry, received substantial support.

Conclusion: Swedish GPs are willing to consider environmental factors when prescribing. However, other factors are more often considered and GPs attribute higher responsibility to other actors. Improving access to environmental information about pharmaceuticals could support greener prescribing.

走向更环保的处方?瑞典全科医生对减少药品污染政策的支持。
目的:开药对改善健康至关重要,但它也对环境产生重大影响。本研究调查了瑞典全科医生(gp)愿意将环境因素纳入治疗决策的程度,以及他们对减少药物污染的政策的意见。方法:在2023年9月至2024年6月期间,制定了一份评估处方中环境因素的问卷,并向1233名瑞典全科医生和正在培训的医生分发(回复率:22%)。它包括3例患者病例,以评估用于疼痛管理,降血压和避孕的药物的治疗效果和环境影响之间的权衡。还包括关于对减少药物对环境影响的政策的态度的问题。数据分析采用描述性和推断性统计。结果:如果对环境有利,大多数受访者愿意开效果较差的药物,77%用于止痛和降血压,50%用于避孕。与成本、区域治疗指南、剂量间隔和用户友好性相比,环境影响被列为处方决策中最不重要的因素。共有68%的受访者同意医生在开处方时应考虑环境因素,但只有少数人在开处方时经常搜索环境信息。针对当局和制药业等其他利益攸关方的政策得到了大力支持。结论:瑞典全科医生在开处方时愿意考虑环境因素。然而,其他因素更常被考虑,全科医生将更高的责任归咎于其他行为者。改善对药品环境信息的获取可以支持更环保的处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
8.80%
发文量
419
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Published on behalf of the British Pharmacological Society, the British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology features papers and reports on all aspects of drug action in humans: review articles, mini review articles, original papers, commentaries, editorials and letters. The Journal enjoys a wide readership, bridging the gap between the medical profession, clinical research and the pharmaceutical industry. It also publishes research on new methods, new drugs and new approaches to treatment. The Journal is recognised as one of the leading publications in its field. It is online only, publishes open access research through its OnlineOpen programme and is published monthly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信