Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
American journal of cancer research Pub Date : 2025-03-15 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.62347/DYFF7059
Yi Peng, Xin Zhang, Jianbin Wu, Hongmei Wang, Xiaoxi Huang
{"title":"Development and validation of a Nomogram to predict postoperative flap necrosis risk in breast cancer patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy.","authors":"Yi Peng, Xin Zhang, Jianbin Wu, Hongmei Wang, Xiaoxi Huang","doi":"10.62347/DYFF7059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Flap necrosis is a critical complication following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer (BC). It not only impairs wound healing but also delays postoperative treatment, adversely affecting patient survival rate and the overall quality of life. Thus, developing an accurate prediction model is crucial for early intervention and improving patient prognosis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a Nomogram model based on Logistic regression to assess the risk of postoperative flap necrosis in BC patients undergoing MRM.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on 605 BC patients who underwent MRM. These patients were stratified into a training group (n=406) and a validation group (n=199) in a 33:67 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for flap necrosis, and a Nomogram prediction model was subsequently constructed. The model's discriminatory power (assessed via the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve), calibration accuracy (evaluated by calibration curve), and clinical benefit (analyzed through decision curve analysis) were comprehensively evaluated. Moreover, essential performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were systematically recorded and analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine independent risk factors were identified, including age, body mass index (BMI), neutrophil count, hemoglobin level, drainage volume on the third postoperative day, axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, and drainage duration. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Nomogram model was 0.898 in the training group and 0.886 in the validation group, indicating good discriminatory capacity. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted values and actual values, with P-values for goodness-of-fit of 0.1761 (training) and 0.0648 (validation), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed significant clinical benefits, with maximum benefit rates of 76.84% (training) and 80.40% (validation), respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The Nomogram model developed in this study accurately predicts flap necrosis risk in BC patients post-MRM, offering significant clinical utility for risk management and improved patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7437,"journal":{"name":"American journal of cancer research","volume":"15 3","pages":"1291-1306"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11982728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of cancer research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62347/DYFF7059","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Flap necrosis is a critical complication following modified radical mastectomy (MRM) for breast cancer (BC). It not only impairs wound healing but also delays postoperative treatment, adversely affecting patient survival rate and the overall quality of life. Thus, developing an accurate prediction model is crucial for early intervention and improving patient prognosis.

Objective: To develop and validate a Nomogram model based on Logistic regression to assess the risk of postoperative flap necrosis in BC patients undergoing MRM.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 605 BC patients who underwent MRM. These patients were stratified into a training group (n=406) and a validation group (n=199) in a 33:67 ratio. Univariate and multivariate Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for flap necrosis, and a Nomogram prediction model was subsequently constructed. The model's discriminatory power (assessed via the receiver operating characteristic [ROC] curve), calibration accuracy (evaluated by calibration curve), and clinical benefit (analyzed through decision curve analysis) were comprehensively evaluated. Moreover, essential performance metrics such as sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were systematically recorded and analyzed.

Results: Nine independent risk factors were identified, including age, body mass index (BMI), neutrophil count, hemoglobin level, drainage volume on the third postoperative day, axillary lymph node metastasis (ALNM), surgical duration, intraoperative bleeding volume, and drainage duration. The area under the curve (AUC) of the Nomogram model was 0.898 in the training group and 0.886 in the validation group, indicating good discriminatory capacity. Calibration curves demonstrated good agreement between predicted values and actual values, with P-values for goodness-of-fit of 0.1761 (training) and 0.0648 (validation), respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed significant clinical benefits, with maximum benefit rates of 76.84% (training) and 80.40% (validation), respectively.

Conclusion: The Nomogram model developed in this study accurately predicts flap necrosis risk in BC patients post-MRM, offering significant clinical utility for risk management and improved patient outcomes.

发展和验证Nomogram预测乳腺癌改良根治术患者术后皮瓣坏死风险。
背景:皮瓣坏死是乳腺癌改良根治术(MRM)后的一个重要并发症。它不仅会损害伤口愈合,还会延迟术后治疗,对患者的存活率和整体生活质量产生不利影响。因此,建立准确的预测模型对于早期干预和改善患者预后至关重要。目的:建立并验证一种基于Logistic回归的Nomogram模型来评估BC患者行MRM术后皮瓣坏死的风险。方法:对605例行MRM的BC患者进行回顾性研究。将这些患者按33:67的比例分为训练组(n=406)和验证组(n=199)。通过单因素和多因素Logistic回归分析,确定皮瓣坏死的危险因素,并建立Nomogram预测模型。综合评价模型的判别能力(通过受试者工作特征曲线评估)、校准精度(通过校准曲线评估)和临床效益(通过决策曲线分析分析)。此外,系统地记录和分析了基本的性能指标,如敏感性、特异性和准确性。结果:确定了9个独立危险因素,包括年龄、体重指数(BMI)、中性粒细胞计数、血红蛋白水平、术后第3天引流量、腋窝淋巴结转移(ALNM)、手术时间、术中出血量、引流时间。训练组和验证组的Nomogram模型的曲线下面积(AUC)分别为0.898和0.886,表明该模型具有较好的判别能力。校准曲线显示预测值与实际值之间具有良好的一致性,拟合优度的p值分别为0.1761(训练)和0.0648(验证)。决策曲线分析显示临床获益显著,最大获益率分别为76.84%(培训)和80.40%(验证)。结论:本研究建立的Nomogram模型准确预测了BC患者mrm后皮瓣坏死风险,为风险管理和改善患者预后提供了重要的临床应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
3.80%
发文量
263
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Cancer Research (AJCR) (ISSN 2156-6976), is an independent open access, online only journal to facilitate rapid dissemination of novel discoveries in basic science and treatment of cancer. It was founded by a group of scientists for cancer research and clinical academic oncologists from around the world, who are devoted to the promotion and advancement of our understanding of the cancer and its treatment. The scope of AJCR is intended to encompass that of multi-disciplinary researchers from any scientific discipline where the primary focus of the research is to increase and integrate knowledge about etiology and molecular mechanisms of carcinogenesis with the ultimate aim of advancing the cure and prevention of this increasingly devastating disease. To achieve these aims AJCR will publish review articles, original articles and new techniques in cancer research and therapy. It will also publish hypothesis, case reports and letter to the editor. Unlike most other open access online journals, AJCR will keep most of the traditional features of paper print that we are all familiar with, such as continuous volume, issue numbers, as well as continuous page numbers to retain our comfortable familiarity towards an academic journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信