Use of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosing giant cell arteritis in a Western Australian tertiary centre: a 36-month analysis.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Madeleine Venables, Andrew Taylor, Julia Murdoch, Jean-Louis De Sousa, Helen Keen
{"title":"Use of fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in diagnosing giant cell arteritis in a Western Australian tertiary centre: a 36-month analysis.","authors":"Madeleine Venables, Andrew Taylor, Julia Murdoch, Jean-Louis De Sousa, Helen Keen","doi":"10.1111/imj.70096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has been established as a beneficial diagnostic tool in large vessel vasculitis. There have been limited studies of its use in real-world clinical practice. We examined patients at Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) from January 2019 to 2022 who had 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and analysed its diagnostic accuracy compared to temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and clinical diagnosis at 6 months.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred to RPH Rheumatology with suspected GCA from January 2019 to 2022 were identified as having had 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnostic evaluation. 18F-FDG-PET/CT results were dichotomous into positive (consistent with GCA) or negative, and compared to TAB and clinical diagnosis of GCA at 6 months by a consultant rheumatologist.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 32 patients had 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnostic purposes; nine of 32 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were positive. Compared to TAB, 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 68% and accuracy of 61.5%. Compared to clinical diagnosis, 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 41%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, an NPV of 44% and accuracy of 59.4%. Only one 18F-FDG-PET/CT (11%) had cranial artery involvement. The median time taking glucocorticoids (GCs) was 7 days (interquartile range (IQR) 0-22.5 days) for positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans, versus 13 days (IQR 8-39 days) for negative 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans. The median time from request to scan was 29 days (IQR 31.5-77 days) for 18F-FDG-PET/CT on 14 or more days of GCs.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>18F-FDG-PET/CT is more likely to be positive if it is performed within 7 days of steroid commencement. 18F-FDG-PET/CT had lower sensitivity and higher specificity than reported in clinical studies. In clinical practice, the significant delays from steroid start to scan time may reduce diagnostic sensitivity. A negative 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan did not negate the need for further investigations.</p>","PeriodicalId":13625,"journal":{"name":"Internal Medicine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal Medicine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/imj.70096","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT) has been established as a beneficial diagnostic tool in large vessel vasculitis. There have been limited studies of its use in real-world clinical practice. We examined patients at Royal Perth Hospital (RPH) with suspected giant cell arteritis (GCA) from January 2019 to 2022 who had 18F-FDG-PET/CT, and analysed its diagnostic accuracy compared to temporal artery biopsy (TAB) and clinical diagnosis at 6 months.

Methods: Patients referred to RPH Rheumatology with suspected GCA from January 2019 to 2022 were identified as having had 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnostic evaluation. 18F-FDG-PET/CT results were dichotomous into positive (consistent with GCA) or negative, and compared to TAB and clinical diagnosis of GCA at 6 months by a consultant rheumatologist.

Results: A total of 32 patients had 18F-FDG-PET/CT for diagnostic purposes; nine of 32 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans were positive. Compared to TAB, 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 50%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 86%, a negative predictive value (NPV) of 68% and accuracy of 61.5%. Compared to clinical diagnosis, 18F-FDG-PET/CT had a sensitivity of 41%, a specificity of 100%, a PPV of 100%, an NPV of 44% and accuracy of 59.4%. Only one 18F-FDG-PET/CT (11%) had cranial artery involvement. The median time taking glucocorticoids (GCs) was 7 days (interquartile range (IQR) 0-22.5 days) for positive 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans, versus 13 days (IQR 8-39 days) for negative 18F-FDG-PET/CT scans. The median time from request to scan was 29 days (IQR 31.5-77 days) for 18F-FDG-PET/CT on 14 or more days of GCs.

Conclusion: 18F-FDG-PET/CT is more likely to be positive if it is performed within 7 days of steroid commencement. 18F-FDG-PET/CT had lower sensitivity and higher specificity than reported in clinical studies. In clinical practice, the significant delays from steroid start to scan time may reduce diagnostic sensitivity. A negative 18F-FDG-PET/CT scan did not negate the need for further investigations.

使用氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描诊断巨细胞动脉炎在西澳大利亚三级中心:36个月的分析。
背景:氟-18-氟脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描(18F-FDG-PET/CT)已被确立为大血管炎的有益诊断工具。它在现实世界临床实践中的应用研究有限。我们检查了2019年1月至2022年1月在皇家珀斯医院(RPH)进行18F-FDG-PET/CT检查的疑似巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)患者,并将其诊断准确性与6个月时的颞动脉活检(TAB)和临床诊断进行了比较。方法:2019年1月至2022年1月,RPH风湿病学中疑似GCA的患者进行了18F-FDG-PET/CT诊断评估。18F-FDG-PET/CT结果分为阳性(与GCA一致)或阴性,并与6个月时风湿病专家的TAB和GCA临床诊断进行比较。结果:32例患者行18F-FDG-PET/CT诊断;32次18F-FDG-PET/CT扫描中9次阳性。与TAB相比,18F-FDG-PET/CT的敏感性为50%,特异性为93%,阳性预测值(PPV)为86%,阴性预测值(NPV)为68%,准确率为61.5%。与临床诊断相比,18F-FDG-PET/CT的敏感性为41%,特异性为100%,PPV为100%,NPV为44%,准确率为59.4%。只有1例(11%)的18F-FDG-PET/CT显示颅内动脉受累。18F-FDG-PET/CT阳性患者服用糖皮质激素(gc)的中位时间为7天(四分位数范围(IQR) 0-22.5天),而18F-FDG-PET/CT阴性患者服用糖皮质激素(gc)的中位时间为13天(IQR 8-39天)。18F-FDG-PET/CT在GCs 14天或以上时,从请求到扫描的中位时间为29天(IQR 31.5-77天)。结论:18F-FDG-PET/CT在使用类固醇后7天内检查更有可能呈阳性。与临床研究报道相比,18F-FDG-PET/CT的敏感性较低,特异性较高。在临床实践中,从类固醇开始到扫描时间的显著延迟可能会降低诊断的敏感性。18F-FDG-PET/CT扫描阴性并不能否定进一步检查的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Internal Medicine Journal
Internal Medicine Journal 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
600
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Internal Medicine Journal is the official journal of the Adult Medicine Division of The Royal Australasian College of Physicians (RACP). Its purpose is to publish high-quality internationally competitive peer-reviewed original medical research, both laboratory and clinical, relating to the study and research of human disease. Papers will be considered from all areas of medical practice and science. The Journal also has a major role in continuing medical education and publishes review articles relevant to physician education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信