The story of pain in people with dementia: a rationale for digital measures.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Monica Patrascu, Line I Berge, Ipsit V Vahia, Brice Marty, Wilco P Achterberg, Heather Allore, Richard R Fletcher, Bettina S Husebo
{"title":"The story of pain in people with dementia: a rationale for digital measures.","authors":"Monica Patrascu, Line I Berge, Ipsit V Vahia, Brice Marty, Wilco P Achterberg, Heather Allore, Richard R Fletcher, Bettina S Husebo","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04057-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasingly older world population presents new aging-related challenges, especially for persons with dementia unable to express their suffering. Pain intensity and the effect of pain treatment are difficult to assess via proxy rating and both under- and overtreatment lead to neuropsychiatric symptoms, inactivity, care-dependency and reduced quality of life. In this debate piece, we provide a rationale on why valid digitalization, sensing technology, and artificial intelligence should be explored to improve the assessment of pain in people with dementia.</p><p><strong>Main text: </strong>In dementia care, traditional pain assessment relies on observing the manifestations of typical pain behavior. At the same time, pain treatment is complicated by polypharmacy, potential side effects, and a lack of around-the-clock, timely measures. But proper pain treatment requires objective and accurate measures that capture both the levels of pain and the treatment effects. Sensing systems research for personalized pain assessment is underway, with some promising results regarding associations between physiological signals and pain. Digital phenotyping, making use of everyday sensor data for monitoring health behaviors such as patterns of sleep or movement, has shown potential in clinical trials and for future continuous observation. This emerging approach requires transdisciplinary collaboration between medical and engineering sciences, with user involvement and adherence to ethical practices.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital phenotyping based on physiological parameters and sensing technology may increase pain assessment objectivity in older adults with dementia. This technology must be designed with user involvement and validated; however, it opens possibilities to improve pain relief and care.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"227"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12004839/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04057-3","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The increasingly older world population presents new aging-related challenges, especially for persons with dementia unable to express their suffering. Pain intensity and the effect of pain treatment are difficult to assess via proxy rating and both under- and overtreatment lead to neuropsychiatric symptoms, inactivity, care-dependency and reduced quality of life. In this debate piece, we provide a rationale on why valid digitalization, sensing technology, and artificial intelligence should be explored to improve the assessment of pain in people with dementia.

Main text: In dementia care, traditional pain assessment relies on observing the manifestations of typical pain behavior. At the same time, pain treatment is complicated by polypharmacy, potential side effects, and a lack of around-the-clock, timely measures. But proper pain treatment requires objective and accurate measures that capture both the levels of pain and the treatment effects. Sensing systems research for personalized pain assessment is underway, with some promising results regarding associations between physiological signals and pain. Digital phenotyping, making use of everyday sensor data for monitoring health behaviors such as patterns of sleep or movement, has shown potential in clinical trials and for future continuous observation. This emerging approach requires transdisciplinary collaboration between medical and engineering sciences, with user involvement and adherence to ethical practices.

Conclusion: Digital phenotyping based on physiological parameters and sensing technology may increase pain assessment objectivity in older adults with dementia. This technology must be designed with user involvement and validated; however, it opens possibilities to improve pain relief and care.

痴呆症患者疼痛的故事:数字测量的基本原理。
背景:日益老龄化的世界人口提出了新的与老龄化相关的挑战,特别是对于无法表达其痛苦的痴呆症患者。疼痛强度和疼痛治疗的效果很难通过代理评级来评估,治疗不足和过度都会导致神经精神症状、不活动、护理依赖和生活质量下降。在这篇辩论文章中,我们提供了为什么应该探索有效的数字化、传感技术和人工智能来改善痴呆症患者疼痛评估的基本原理。在痴呆症护理中,传统的疼痛评估依赖于观察典型疼痛行为的表现。与此同时,疼痛治疗因多种药物、潜在的副作用以及缺乏全天候及时的措施而变得复杂。但适当的疼痛治疗需要客观和准确的测量,以捕捉疼痛水平和治疗效果。个性化疼痛评估的传感系统研究正在进行中,在生理信号和疼痛之间的关联方面取得了一些有希望的结果。数字表型,利用日常传感器数据来监测健康行为,如睡眠或运动模式,在临床试验和未来的持续观察中显示出潜力。这种新方法需要医学和工程科学之间的跨学科合作,用户参与并遵守道德规范。结论:基于生理参数和传感技术的数字表型可提高老年痴呆患者疼痛评估的客观性。这项技术必须在用户参与的情况下进行设计和验证;然而,它开启了改善疼痛缓解和护理的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信