Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial123I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake.

IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato
{"title":"Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake.","authors":"Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adccc9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adccc9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.

评价心肌123i - mibg闪烁成像中标准化摄取值定量评估的效用:肺和肝摄取影响的模拟研究。
在这项研究中,我们旨在通过评估肺和肝脏摄取变化对心脏-纵隔(H/M)和心肌SUV的影响,阐明心肌标准化摄取值(SUV)方法在心肌123i -metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG)显像中的应用。利用模拟医学成像核探测器的蒙特卡罗模拟代码,模拟了在心肌MIBG闪烁成像假设摄取正常的情况下,心肌幻像HL的成像。此外,我们还模拟了不同肺和肝脏摄取浓度的多个心肌幻像hl的成像。根据数字心肌幻影HL的模拟数据计算心肌SUV和H/M比的定量值。通过评估各计算值的相对标准偏差(RSD)来评估肺和肝摄取变化的影响。对于肺摄取变化,心肌SUV法最大计数的RSD为1.34%,平均计数的RSD为1.64%,H/M比的RSD为4.73%。对于肝脏摄取的变化,心肌SUV法的最大计数RSD为1.73%,平均计数RSD为0.72%,H/M比RSD为0.02%。在剔除明显受肝摄取影响的片段后,心肌SUV法的RSD最大值为0.007%,平均值为0.004%,均小于H/M比的RSD。这些结果表明,与H/M比相比,心肌SUV方法可以进行定量评估,受肺和肝摄取的影响较小,从而能够更稳定地评估心肌摄取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express
Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
153
期刊介绍: BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信