Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial123I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake.
IF 1.3 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato
{"title":"Evaluation of the utility of quantitative assessment using standardized uptake value in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-MIBG scintigraphy: a phantom study on the influence of lung and liver uptake.","authors":"Yoshiaki Yasumoto, Hiromitsu Daisaki, Mitsuru Sato","doi":"10.1088/2057-1976/adccc9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial<sup>123</sup>I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":8896,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","volume":"11 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Physics & Engineering Express","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/2057-1976/adccc9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this study, we aimed to clarify the utility of the myocardial standardized uptake value (SUV) method in myocardial123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy by evaluating the impact of lung and liver uptake changes on both the heart-to-mediastinum (H/M) and myocardial SUV. The Monte Carlo simulation code simulating medical imaging nuclear detectors was used to simulate the imaging of a myocardial phantom HL under the assumption of normal uptake in myocardial MIBG scintigraphy. In addition, imaging of multiple myocardial phantom HLs with different lung and liver uptake concentrations was simulated. Quantitative values for the myocardial SUV and H/M ratio were calculated from the simulated data of the digital myocardial phantom HL. The effects of lung and liver uptake variation were evaluated by assessing the relative standard deviation (RSD) of each calculated value. For lung uptake variations, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.34% for the maximum count and 1.64% for the mean count, whereas the RSD of the H/M ratio was 4.73%. For variations in liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 1.73% for the maximum count and 0.72% for the mean count, with the RSD of the H/M ratio being 0.02%. After removing the segments clearly influenced by liver uptake, the RSD of the myocardial SUV method was 0.007% for the maximum value and 0.004% for the mean value, which were both smaller than the RSD of the H/M ratio. These findings indicate that the myocardial SUV method allows for a quantitative evaluation that is less influenced by lung and liver uptake compared with the H/M ratio, thereby enabling a more stable assessment of myocardial uptake.
期刊介绍:
BPEX is an inclusive, international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to publishing new research on any application of physics and/or engineering in medicine and/or biology. Characterized by a broad geographical coverage and a fast-track peer-review process, relevant topics include all aspects of biophysics, medical physics and biomedical engineering. Papers that are almost entirely clinical or biological in their focus are not suitable. The journal has an emphasis on publishing interdisciplinary work and bringing research fields together, encompassing experimental, theoretical and computational work.