Simon Alfred Handley, Suzanne Barnes, Nicole Jenkins, Troy Wanandy
{"title":"Performance of the Binding Site cerebrospinal fluid kappa free light chains assay.","authors":"Simon Alfred Handley, Suzanne Barnes, Nicole Jenkins, Troy Wanandy","doi":"10.1177/00045632251337616","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundMeasurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLCs) for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis has generated interest as an alternative to CSF oligoclonal bands due to its rapid turnaround time and ability to automate the assay. A turbidimetric immunoassay - Freelite Mx, is available from the Binding Site, but published data on performance is scant. Therefore, we undertook a multicentre sample comparison and investigated reagent lot-to-lot-variation (LTLV).MethodsIntra-/inter-assay accuracy and imprecision of the Freelite Mx assay on the Binding Site Optilite analyser was assessed. Twenty paired CSF/serum samples were sent to three laboratories within Australia for the measurement of CSF/serum KFLC/albumin and concentrations compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank (rs), and Passing-Bablok analysis. Lot-to-lot-variation between three reagent lots was undertaken by analysis of 20 CSF samples.ResultsIntra- and inter-assay imprecision was ≤4.4 and ≤4.1%, respectively. There was a good correlation (rs = ≥0.98) between sites for the measured CSF KFLC concentration, and no significant difference in the median concentration measured between sites (3.31, 2.78, and 3.48 mg/L, <i>P</i> = .98). The median bias between reagent lots was <4%, the intercept of the regression between lots was between -0.02 and 0.06 mg/L, and the slope ranged from 0.96 to 1.07.ConclusionOverall, there was a good agreement in CSF KFLC concentrations among laboratories, and LTLV was deemed acceptable. Ascertaining biological variability of CSF KFLCs and the participation of laboratories in quality assurance schemes would assist with harmonisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":8005,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","volume":" ","pages":"45632251337616"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical Biochemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00045632251337616","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BackgroundMeasurement of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) kappa free light chains (KFLCs) for the detection of intrathecal immunoglobulin synthesis has generated interest as an alternative to CSF oligoclonal bands due to its rapid turnaround time and ability to automate the assay. A turbidimetric immunoassay - Freelite Mx, is available from the Binding Site, but published data on performance is scant. Therefore, we undertook a multicentre sample comparison and investigated reagent lot-to-lot-variation (LTLV).MethodsIntra-/inter-assay accuracy and imprecision of the Freelite Mx assay on the Binding Site Optilite analyser was assessed. Twenty paired CSF/serum samples were sent to three laboratories within Australia for the measurement of CSF/serum KFLC/albumin and concentrations compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test, Spearman's rank (rs), and Passing-Bablok analysis. Lot-to-lot-variation between three reagent lots was undertaken by analysis of 20 CSF samples.ResultsIntra- and inter-assay imprecision was ≤4.4 and ≤4.1%, respectively. There was a good correlation (rs = ≥0.98) between sites for the measured CSF KFLC concentration, and no significant difference in the median concentration measured between sites (3.31, 2.78, and 3.48 mg/L, P = .98). The median bias between reagent lots was <4%, the intercept of the regression between lots was between -0.02 and 0.06 mg/L, and the slope ranged from 0.96 to 1.07.ConclusionOverall, there was a good agreement in CSF KFLC concentrations among laboratories, and LTLV was deemed acceptable. Ascertaining biological variability of CSF KFLCs and the participation of laboratories in quality assurance schemes would assist with harmonisation.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is the fully peer reviewed international journal of the Association for Clinical Biochemistry and Laboratory Medicine.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry accepts papers that contribute to knowledge in all fields of laboratory medicine, especially those pertaining to the understanding, diagnosis and treatment of human disease. It publishes papers on clinical biochemistry, clinical audit, metabolic medicine, immunology, genetics, biotechnology, haematology, microbiology, computing and management where they have both biochemical and clinical relevance. Papers describing evaluation or implementation of commercial reagent kits or the performance of new analysers require substantial original information. Unless of exceptional interest and novelty, studies dealing with the redox status in various diseases are not generally considered within the journal''s scope. Studies documenting the association of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) with particular phenotypes will not normally be considered, given the greater strength of genome wide association studies (GWAS). Research undertaken in non-human animals will not be considered for publication in the Annals.
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry is also the official journal of NVKC (de Nederlandse Vereniging voor Klinische Chemie) and JSCC (Japan Society of Clinical Chemistry).