{"title":"Evaluation of ctDNA-based <i>ESR1</i> testing in breast cancer: results from the first external quality assessment scheme in China.","authors":"Guigao Lin, Jing Li, Kuo Zhang","doi":"10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing of plasma for ESR1 somatic variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed on frontline therapy. To ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable ESR1 testing across China, an pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Aliquots of five artificial reference plasma samples containing ESR1 mutations at varying allelic frequencies were distributed to 37 laboratories for testing and reporting according to routine procedures. The genotyping accuracy and clinical reporting were evaluated against standardized criteria, and feedback was provided to the participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall genotyping error rate in the EQA was 6.29%, with 91.4% of laboratories correctly identifying the ESR1 mutational status in all samples. A variety of extraction methods and analytical techniques were employed. However, reports often failed to address the risk that tumor DNA may not have been tested, and the limitations of the methodologies used by participants were insufficiently discussed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The variability in genotyping accuracy and reporting standards underscores the importance of EQA and educational guidance to ensure the provision of high-quality clinical services.</p>","PeriodicalId":12113,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14737159.2025.2498542","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) testing of plasma for ESR1 somatic variants is essential for guiding treatment decisions in hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced or metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients who have progressed on frontline therapy. To ensure optimal, uniform, and reliable ESR1 testing across China, an pilot external quality assessment (EQA) scheme was established.
Methods: Aliquots of five artificial reference plasma samples containing ESR1 mutations at varying allelic frequencies were distributed to 37 laboratories for testing and reporting according to routine procedures. The genotyping accuracy and clinical reporting were evaluated against standardized criteria, and feedback was provided to the participants.
Results: The overall genotyping error rate in the EQA was 6.29%, with 91.4% of laboratories correctly identifying the ESR1 mutational status in all samples. A variety of extraction methods and analytical techniques were employed. However, reports often failed to address the risk that tumor DNA may not have been tested, and the limitations of the methodologies used by participants were insufficiently discussed.
Conclusion: The variability in genotyping accuracy and reporting standards underscores the importance of EQA and educational guidance to ensure the provision of high-quality clinical services.
期刊介绍:
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics (ISSN 1473-7159) publishes expert reviews of the latest advancements in the field of molecular diagnostics including the detection and monitoring of the molecular causes of disease that are being translated into groundbreaking diagnostic and prognostic technologies to be used in the clinical diagnostic setting.
Each issue of Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics contains leading reviews on current and emerging topics relating to molecular diagnostics, subject to a rigorous peer review process; editorials discussing contentious issues in the field; diagnostic profiles featuring independent, expert evaluations of diagnostic tests; meeting reports of recent molecular diagnostics conferences and key paper evaluations featuring assessments of significant, recently published articles from specialists in molecular diagnostic therapy.
Expert Review of Molecular Diagnostics provides the forum for reporting the critical advances being made in this ever-expanding field, as well as the major challenges ahead in their clinical implementation. The journal delivers this information in concise, at-a-glance article formats: invaluable to a time-constrained community.