Outcomes of Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.

IF 8.3 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Adam Gurwin, Anna Barnaś, Hamza Ismail, Marcin Miszczyk, Piotr Zapała, Mikołaj Przydacz, Wojciech Krajewski, Andrzej Antczak, Marcin Życzkowski, Łukasz Nyk, Giancarlo Marra, Juan G Rivas, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Giorgio Gandaglia, Morgan Rouprêt, Guillaume Ploussard, Shahrokh F Shariat, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Piotr Radziszewski, Tomasz Drewa, Roman Sosnowski, Paweł Rajwa
{"title":"Outcomes of Focal Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Prospective Studies.","authors":"Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Adam Gurwin, Anna Barnaś, Hamza Ismail, Marcin Miszczyk, Piotr Zapała, Mikołaj Przydacz, Wojciech Krajewski, Andrzej Antczak, Marcin Życzkowski, Łukasz Nyk, Giancarlo Marra, Juan G Rivas, Veeru Kasivisvanathan, Giorgio Gandaglia, Morgan Rouprêt, Guillaume Ploussard, Shahrokh F Shariat, Bartosz Małkiewicz, Piotr Radziszewski, Tomasz Drewa, Roman Sosnowski, Paweł Rajwa","doi":"10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Focal therapies (FTs) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) are recommended only within prospective registries or clinical trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize data from prospective trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FTs in patients with clinically localized PCa.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified prospective studies reporting oncological outcomes of FTs in treatment-naïve, clinically localized PCa patients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven clinically significant PCa (csPCa; International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2) recurrence-free survival (csPCa RFS). The secondary endpoints included RFS, radical/systemic treatment-free survival, and adverse event (AE) rates.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Fifty studies including 4615 patients treated with FTs were analyzed; of these 50 studies, 19 were on predominantly intermediate-risk (n = 2800), 16 on mixed low-/intermediate-risk (n = 990), and 15 on low-risk (n = 825) patients. Estimates of 12- and 24-mo csPCa RFS rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-89%) and 81% (95% CI: 74-86%), respectively. In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the 12-mo csPCa RFS rate was 79% (95% CI: 74-83%). Five-year radical and systemic treatment-free survival was 82% (95% CI: 75-88%). The pooled incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 3% (95% CI: 2-5%). Pad-requiring urinary incontinence increased by 3% (95% CI: 0-6%), with 11% of patients developing new erectile dysfunction (95% CI: 4-18%). The median follow-up of 21 mo (interquartile range 12-34) and the use of surrogate endpoints constitute the major limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The primarily short-term data from prospective studies of FT in clinically localized PCa demonstrate moderate to high cancer control with a favorable safety profile.</p>","PeriodicalId":12256,"journal":{"name":"European urology oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2025.02.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Focal therapies (FTs) for localized prostate cancer (PCa) are recommended only within prospective registries or clinical trials. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aimed to synthesize data from prospective trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of FTs in patients with clinically localized PCa.

Methods: Systematic searches of the PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases identified prospective studies reporting oncological outcomes of FTs in treatment-naïve, clinically localized PCa patients. The primary endpoint was biopsy-proven clinically significant PCa (csPCa; International Society of Urological Pathology grade group ≥2) recurrence-free survival (csPCa RFS). The secondary endpoints included RFS, radical/systemic treatment-free survival, and adverse event (AE) rates.

Key findings and limitations: Fifty studies including 4615 patients treated with FTs were analyzed; of these 50 studies, 19 were on predominantly intermediate-risk (n = 2800), 16 on mixed low-/intermediate-risk (n = 990), and 15 on low-risk (n = 825) patients. Estimates of 12- and 24-mo csPCa RFS rates were 86% (95% confidence interval [CI] 82-89%) and 81% (95% CI: 74-86%), respectively. In the intermediate-risk subgroup, the 12-mo csPCa RFS rate was 79% (95% CI: 74-83%). Five-year radical and systemic treatment-free survival was 82% (95% CI: 75-88%). The pooled incidence of grade ≥3 AEs was 3% (95% CI: 2-5%). Pad-requiring urinary incontinence increased by 3% (95% CI: 0-6%), with 11% of patients developing new erectile dysfunction (95% CI: 4-18%). The median follow-up of 21 mo (interquartile range 12-34) and the use of surrogate endpoints constitute the major limitations.

Conclusions and clinical implications: The primarily short-term data from prospective studies of FT in clinically localized PCa demonstrate moderate to high cancer control with a favorable safety profile.

局限性前列腺癌局灶治疗的结果:前瞻性研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景和目的:局限性前列腺癌(PCa)的局灶性治疗(FTs)仅在前瞻性登记或临床试验中被推荐。在这篇系统综述和荟萃分析中,我们旨在综合前瞻性试验的数据,评估FTs对临床局限性PCa患者的有效性和安全性。方法:对PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库进行系统搜索,确定了报道treatment-naïve临床定位PCa患者FTs肿瘤结果的前瞻性研究。主要终点是活检证实有临床意义的PCa (csPCa;国际泌尿外科病理学会分级组≥2)无复发生存(csPCa RFS)。次要终点包括RFS、根治/全身无治疗生存期和不良事件(AE)率。主要发现和局限性:对包括4615例FTs患者在内的50项研究进行分析;在这50项研究中,19项主要是中危患者(n = 2800), 16项是低/中危混合患者(n = 990), 15项是低危患者(n = 825)。估计12个月和24个月的csPCa RFS率分别为86%(95%置信区间[CI] 82-89%)和81% (95% CI: 74-86%)。在中危亚组中,12个月csPCa RFS率为79% (95% CI: 74-83%)。5年根治和全身无治疗生存率为82% (95% CI: 75-88%)。≥3级ae的合并发生率为3% (95% CI: 2-5%)。需要垫尿失禁的患者增加了3% (95% CI: 0-6%),其中11%的患者出现新的勃起功能障碍(95% CI: 4-18%)。中位随访21个月(四分位间距12-34)和替代终点的使用是主要的局限性。结论和临床意义:FT在临床上局限性PCa中的前瞻性研究的主要短期数据表明,中度至高度的癌症控制具有良好的安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
15.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
128
审稿时长
20 days
期刊介绍: Journal Name: European Urology Oncology Affiliation: Official Journal of the European Association of Urology Focus: First official publication of the EAU fully devoted to the study of genitourinary malignancies Aims to deliver high-quality research Content: Includes original articles, opinion piece editorials, and invited reviews Covers clinical, basic, and translational research Publication Frequency: Six times a year in electronic format
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信