A Work-Related Health Check to Identify the Need for Rehabilitation and Preventive Care (Check-Up 45+): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in General Practice (PReHa45).
Jennifer Marie Burchardi, Paul Gellert, Martin Brünger
{"title":"A Work-Related Health Check to Identify the Need for Rehabilitation and Preventive Care (Check-Up 45+): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in General Practice (PReHa45).","authors":"Jennifer Marie Burchardi, Paul Gellert, Martin Brünger","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners are the main mediators of rehabilitation and prevention services for their patients, yet many who could benefit from such services do not receive them because there has not, to date, been any structured means of detecting need. We studied the efficacy of a work-related health check for persons aged 45 and over (\"check-up 45+\") to identify the need for rehabilitation and preventive care in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a pragmatic, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (registration no. DRKS00028303), the participating patients (aged 45 to 59) received, in addition to usual care, either a short questionnaire alone (695 patients) or, additionally, the \"check-up 45+\" (706 patients), in which the need for rehabilitation or prevention services was assessed with a validated \"screening 45+\" questionnaire and subsequent evaluation by the general practitioner. The primary endpoint was the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services, as determined from routine data derived from the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The secondary endpoints were approvals of services, actual provision of services, and needs identified by the \"check-up 45+\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applications for rehabilitation and prevention services were four times more common for patients who received the \"check-up 45+\" than for those who did not (12.0% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001). The percentages of approved and completed services were higher as well (8.4% vs. 2.4%; 7.2% vs. 2.3%; p<0.001 for both). The \"checkup 45+\" identified a need for rehabilitation in 17.7% of patients and a need for preventive services in 26.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the use of the \"check-up 45+\" in primary care increases the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services. The \"check-up 45+\" can improve needs-based access to rehabilitation and prevention services through early, structured recognition of the patient's needs and ensuing application for these services.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"315-320"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: General practitioners are the main mediators of rehabilitation and prevention services for their patients, yet many who could benefit from such services do not receive them because there has not, to date, been any structured means of detecting need. We studied the efficacy of a work-related health check for persons aged 45 and over ("check-up 45+") to identify the need for rehabilitation and preventive care in general practice.
Methods: In a pragmatic, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (registration no. DRKS00028303), the participating patients (aged 45 to 59) received, in addition to usual care, either a short questionnaire alone (695 patients) or, additionally, the "check-up 45+" (706 patients), in which the need for rehabilitation or prevention services was assessed with a validated "screening 45+" questionnaire and subsequent evaluation by the general practitioner. The primary endpoint was the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services, as determined from routine data derived from the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The secondary endpoints were approvals of services, actual provision of services, and needs identified by the "check-up 45+".
Results: Applications for rehabilitation and prevention services were four times more common for patients who received the "check-up 45+" than for those who did not (12.0% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001). The percentages of approved and completed services were higher as well (8.4% vs. 2.4%; 7.2% vs. 2.3%; p<0.001 for both). The "checkup 45+" identified a need for rehabilitation in 17.7% of patients and a need for preventive services in 26.3%.
Conclusion: These findings indicate that the use of the "check-up 45+" in primary care increases the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services. The "check-up 45+" can improve needs-based access to rehabilitation and prevention services through early, structured recognition of the patient's needs and ensuing application for these services.
期刊介绍:
Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence.
The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include:
Carelit
CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature)
Compendex
DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals)
EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database)
EMNursing
GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data)
HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative)
Index Copernicus
Medline (MEDLARS Online)
Medpilot
PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database)
Science Citation Index Expanded
Scopus
By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.