A Work-Related Health Check to Identify the Need for Rehabilitation and Preventive Care (Check-Up 45+): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in General Practice (PReHa45).

IF 7.1 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Jennifer Marie Burchardi, Paul Gellert, Martin Brünger
{"title":"A Work-Related Health Check to Identify the Need for Rehabilitation and Preventive Care (Check-Up 45+): A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial in General Practice (PReHa45).","authors":"Jennifer Marie Burchardi, Paul Gellert, Martin Brünger","doi":"10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0055","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>General practitioners are the main mediators of rehabilitation and prevention services for their patients, yet many who could benefit from such services do not receive them because there has not, to date, been any structured means of detecting need. We studied the efficacy of a work-related health check for persons aged 45 and over (\"check-up 45+\") to identify the need for rehabilitation and preventive care in general practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a pragmatic, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (registration no. DRKS00028303), the participating patients (aged 45 to 59) received, in addition to usual care, either a short questionnaire alone (695 patients) or, additionally, the \"check-up 45+\" (706 patients), in which the need for rehabilitation or prevention services was assessed with a validated \"screening 45+\" questionnaire and subsequent evaluation by the general practitioner. The primary endpoint was the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services, as determined from routine data derived from the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The secondary endpoints were approvals of services, actual provision of services, and needs identified by the \"check-up 45+\".</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Applications for rehabilitation and prevention services were four times more common for patients who received the \"check-up 45+\" than for those who did not (12.0% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001). The percentages of approved and completed services were higher as well (8.4% vs. 2.4%; 7.2% vs. 2.3%; p<0.001 for both). The \"checkup 45+\" identified a need for rehabilitation in 17.7% of patients and a need for preventive services in 26.3%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings indicate that the use of the \"check-up 45+\" in primary care increases the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services. The \"check-up 45+\" can improve needs-based access to rehabilitation and prevention services through early, structured recognition of the patient's needs and ensuing application for these services.</p>","PeriodicalId":11258,"journal":{"name":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","volume":" Forthcoming","pages":"315-320"},"PeriodicalIF":7.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Deutsches Arzteblatt international","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.m2025.0055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: General practitioners are the main mediators of rehabilitation and prevention services for their patients, yet many who could benefit from such services do not receive them because there has not, to date, been any structured means of detecting need. We studied the efficacy of a work-related health check for persons aged 45 and over ("check-up 45+") to identify the need for rehabilitation and preventive care in general practice.

Methods: In a pragmatic, multicenter, 1:1 randomized controlled trial (registration no. DRKS00028303), the participating patients (aged 45 to 59) received, in addition to usual care, either a short questionnaire alone (695 patients) or, additionally, the "check-up 45+" (706 patients), in which the need for rehabilitation or prevention services was assessed with a validated "screening 45+" questionnaire and subsequent evaluation by the general practitioner. The primary endpoint was the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services, as determined from routine data derived from the German Pension Insurance (Deutsche Rentenversicherung). The secondary endpoints were approvals of services, actual provision of services, and needs identified by the "check-up 45+".

Results: Applications for rehabilitation and prevention services were four times more common for patients who received the "check-up 45+" than for those who did not (12.0% vs. 2.9%; p<0.001). The percentages of approved and completed services were higher as well (8.4% vs. 2.4%; 7.2% vs. 2.3%; p<0.001 for both). The "checkup 45+" identified a need for rehabilitation in 17.7% of patients and a need for preventive services in 26.3%.

Conclusion: These findings indicate that the use of the "check-up 45+" in primary care increases the number of applications for rehabilitation and prevention services. The "check-up 45+" can improve needs-based access to rehabilitation and prevention services through early, structured recognition of the patient's needs and ensuing application for these services.

与工作相关的健康检查以确定康复和预防保健的需要(检查45+):一项多中心随机对照试验(PReHa45)。
背景:全科医生是为患者提供康复和预防服务的主要调解人,然而,许多可以从这种服务中受益的人没有得到这些服务,因为迄今为止还没有任何检测需求的结构化手段。我们研究了对45岁及以上的人进行与工作有关的健康检查(“检查45岁以上”)的效果,以确定在一般实践中对康复和预防保健的需要。方法:在一项实用的、多中心的、1:1随机对照试验中(注册号:DRKS00028303),参与的患者(年龄在45至59岁之间)除了接受常规护理外,还接受了一份简短的问卷调查(695名患者),或者另外接受了“检查45+”(706名患者),其中使用经过验证的“筛选45+”问卷评估康复或预防服务的需求,随后由全科医生进行评估。主要终点是康复和预防服务的申请数量,这是根据德国养老保险(Deutsche Rentenversicherung)的常规数据确定的。次要端点是服务的批准、服务的实际提供和“检查45+”确定的需求。结果:接受“45+”检查的患者申请康复预防服务的比例是未接受“45+”检查的患者的4倍(12.0%比2.9%;结论:在基层医疗中使用“体检45+”增加了康复和预防服务的申请数量。“45+体检”可以通过早期、有组织地识别患者的需求并随后申请这些服务,改善基于需求的康复和预防服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Deutsches Arzteblatt international
Deutsches Arzteblatt international 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
5.20%
发文量
306
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Deutsches Ärzteblatt International is a bilingual (German and English) weekly online journal that focuses on clinical medicine and public health. It serves as the official publication for both the German Medical Association and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians. The journal is dedicated to publishing independent, peer-reviewed articles that cover a wide range of clinical medicine disciplines. It also features editorials and a dedicated section for scientific discussion, known as correspondence. The journal aims to provide valuable medical information to its international readership and offers insights into the German medical landscape. Since its launch in January 2008, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International has been recognized and included in several prestigious databases, which helps to ensure its content is accessible and credible to the global medical community. These databases include: Carelit CINAHL (Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) Compendex DOAJ (Directory of Open Access Journals) EMBASE (Excerpta Medica database) EMNursing GEOBASE (Geoscience & Environmental Data) HINARI (Health InterNetwork Access to Research Initiative) Index Copernicus Medline (MEDLARS Online) Medpilot PsycINFO (Psychological Information Database) Science Citation Index Expanded Scopus By being indexed in these databases, Deutsches Ärzteblatt International's articles are made available to researchers, clinicians, and healthcare professionals worldwide, contributing to the global exchange of medical knowledge and research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信