{"title":"Phenobarbital for inpatient palliative sedation-a clinical audit.","authors":"Brendan Tan, Grace Freeman-Spratt, Hossein Kasiri","doi":"10.1136/spcare-2024-005361","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Identify the indication, route of administration and dose for phenobarbital continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) in palliative sedation therapy (PST).Assess the dosing and continuation of midazolam and levomepromazine in conjunction with phenobarbital.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This clinical audit examined inpatient phenobarbital CSCI use for PST from January 2021 to April 2024. Data were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records (n=23).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most common indication for phenobarbital CSCI was agitation, followed by sedation for non-invasive ventilation withdrawal. Phenobarbital was administered subcutaneously in all cases without adverse systemic or site reactions.The most common loading dose was 200 mg (50-200 mg), and the most common initiating CSCI dose was 800 mg/24 hours (400-1200 mg/24 hours). The maximum dose was 1800 mg/24 hours. The average time to death following start of phenobarbital was 52 hours (4-123 hours). Most patients (n=22) were described as comfortable at death.Before starting phenobarbital CSCI, all patients were on midazolam CSCI (mean dose 50 mg), which was continued in 14 patients. Seventeen patients received levomepromazine CSCI (mean dose 137 mg), which was continued in 12 patients.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Phenobarbital appears to be an effective medication for PST. However, inconsistencies in dosing, concurrent sedative medication use and standardised protocols highlight areas for improvement in clinical guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":9136,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/spcare-2024-005361","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Identify the indication, route of administration and dose for phenobarbital continuous subcutaneous infusion (CSCI) in palliative sedation therapy (PST).Assess the dosing and continuation of midazolam and levomepromazine in conjunction with phenobarbital.
Methods: This clinical audit examined inpatient phenobarbital CSCI use for PST from January 2021 to April 2024. Data were retrospectively extracted from electronic medical records (n=23).
Results: The most common indication for phenobarbital CSCI was agitation, followed by sedation for non-invasive ventilation withdrawal. Phenobarbital was administered subcutaneously in all cases without adverse systemic or site reactions.The most common loading dose was 200 mg (50-200 mg), and the most common initiating CSCI dose was 800 mg/24 hours (400-1200 mg/24 hours). The maximum dose was 1800 mg/24 hours. The average time to death following start of phenobarbital was 52 hours (4-123 hours). Most patients (n=22) were described as comfortable at death.Before starting phenobarbital CSCI, all patients were on midazolam CSCI (mean dose 50 mg), which was continued in 14 patients. Seventeen patients received levomepromazine CSCI (mean dose 137 mg), which was continued in 12 patients.
Conclusion: Phenobarbital appears to be an effective medication for PST. However, inconsistencies in dosing, concurrent sedative medication use and standardised protocols highlight areas for improvement in clinical guidelines.
期刊介绍:
Published quarterly in print and continuously online, BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care aims to connect many disciplines and specialties throughout the world by providing high quality, clinically relevant research, reviews, comment, information and news of international importance.
We hold an inclusive view of supportive and palliative care research and we are able to call on expertise to critique the whole range of methodologies within the subject, including those working in transitional research, clinical trials, epidemiology, behavioural sciences, ethics and health service research. Articles with relevance to clinical practice and clinical service development will be considered for publication.
In an international context, many different categories of clinician and healthcare workers do clinical work associated with palliative medicine, specialist or generalist palliative care, supportive care, psychosocial-oncology and end of life care. We wish to engage many specialties, not only those traditionally associated with supportive and palliative care. We hope to extend the readership to doctors, nurses, other healthcare workers and researchers in medical and surgical specialties, including but not limited to cardiology, gastroenterology, geriatrics, neurology, oncology, paediatrics, primary care, psychiatry, psychology, renal medicine, respiratory medicine.