{"title":"Treatment of low vision in the progressive cone dystrophies.","authors":"T T McMahon, M Hansen","doi":"10.1097/00006324-198811000-00009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Twenty-three patients suffering from the progressive cone dystrophies (PCD) were evaluated retrospectively, after they had undergone treatment for low vision. All patients were able to read 1 M or smaller print with magnification, despite poor central acuity. Eighteen (78%) patients achieved their primary rehabilitation goal, and 86% of the low vision devices prescribed were used at follow-up. Photosensitivity was reported by a large number of patients. Seven patients indicated that alleviating this problem was their primary rehabilitation goal. Eight (35%) found sun filters to be helpful. Our successful experience with patients with these disorders suggests that examination for, and trial of, low vision devices is warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":7700,"journal":{"name":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","volume":"65 11","pages":"909-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1097/00006324-198811000-00009","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of optometry and physiological optics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-198811000-00009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Twenty-three patients suffering from the progressive cone dystrophies (PCD) were evaluated retrospectively, after they had undergone treatment for low vision. All patients were able to read 1 M or smaller print with magnification, despite poor central acuity. Eighteen (78%) patients achieved their primary rehabilitation goal, and 86% of the low vision devices prescribed were used at follow-up. Photosensitivity was reported by a large number of patients. Seven patients indicated that alleviating this problem was their primary rehabilitation goal. Eight (35%) found sun filters to be helpful. Our successful experience with patients with these disorders suggests that examination for, and trial of, low vision devices is warranted.