Impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Seán Fennessy, Caoimhe McGarvey, Edel McDermott, Richéal Burns, Patrick Redmond
{"title":"Impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction in outpatient gastrointestinal endoscopy: a systematic review.","authors":"Seán Fennessy, Caoimhe McGarvey, Edel McDermott, Richéal Burns, Patrick Redmond","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001744","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The integration of digital health technologies in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy presents opportunities to enhance patient experience, an important dimension of care quality. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction and experience in outpatient endoscopy settings.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A systematic review and narrative synthesis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases were searched through 9 March 2023.</p><p><strong>Eligibility criteria: </strong>Studies were eligible if they involved adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing outpatient colonoscopy or gastroscopy and in English. Interventions included any form of educational digital health technology aimed at enhancing healthcare delivery. Telehealth studies were not included.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mixed-method approach was employed for the narrative synthesis, focusing on the primary outcome of patient experience and satisfaction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, all assessing patient satisfaction rather than experience. Five studies reported improved satisfaction associated with digital interventions, three showed no significant change, and one lacked statistical analysis. Interventions ranged from smartphone applications to online educational resources, and satisfaction measurement tools varied significantly. Overall, the evidence was characterised by heterogeneity and very low methodological quality.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Digital health interventions may have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in GI endoscopy, although evidence quality is very low and outcome measurement is inconsistent. Future research should focus on standardising measures of patient experience and satisfaction, ensuring robust study designs to inform the integration of digital health tools into endoscopy practice.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>CRD42023428609.</p>","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"12 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12015691/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2025-001744","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The integration of digital health technologies in gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy presents opportunities to enhance patient experience, an important dimension of care quality. This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of digital health interventions on patient satisfaction and experience in outpatient endoscopy settings.

Design: A systematic review and narrative synthesis were conducted following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Data sources: PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, PsycInfo, and Cochrane databases were searched through 9 March 2023.

Eligibility criteria: Studies were eligible if they involved adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing outpatient colonoscopy or gastroscopy and in English. Interventions included any form of educational digital health technology aimed at enhancing healthcare delivery. Telehealth studies were not included.

Data extraction and synthesis: Two independent reviewers extracted data and assessed risk of bias, using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. A mixed-method approach was employed for the narrative synthesis, focusing on the primary outcome of patient experience and satisfaction.

Results: Nine studies met the inclusion criteria, all assessing patient satisfaction rather than experience. Five studies reported improved satisfaction associated with digital interventions, three showed no significant change, and one lacked statistical analysis. Interventions ranged from smartphone applications to online educational resources, and satisfaction measurement tools varied significantly. Overall, the evidence was characterised by heterogeneity and very low methodological quality.

Conclusion: Digital health interventions may have a positive impact on patient satisfaction in GI endoscopy, although evidence quality is very low and outcome measurement is inconsistent. Future research should focus on standardising measures of patient experience and satisfaction, ensuring robust study designs to inform the integration of digital health tools into endoscopy practice.

Prospero registration number: CRD42023428609.

数字健康干预对门诊胃肠内窥镜患者满意度的影响:一项系统综述。
目的:胃肠道(GI)内窥镜中数字健康技术的整合为提高患者体验提供了机会,这是护理质量的一个重要方面。本系统综述旨在评估数字健康干预对门诊内窥镜检查患者满意度和体验的影响。设计:根据2020年系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目和建议分级评估、发展和评估方法进行系统评价和叙事综合。数据来源:PubMed/Medline、EMBASE、PsycInfo和Cochrane数据库检索至2023年3月9日。入选标准:纳入接受门诊结肠镜检查或胃镜检查的成年患者(≥18岁),且为英文研究。干预措施包括旨在加强保健服务的任何形式的教育数字卫生技术。远程医疗研究未包括在内。数据提取和综合:两名独立审稿人使用混合方法评估工具提取数据并评估偏倚风险。采用混合方法进行叙事综合,重点关注患者体验和满意度的主要结果。结果:9项研究符合纳入标准,均评估患者满意度而非体验。五项研究报告了与数字干预相关的满意度提高,三项研究显示没有显著变化,一项缺乏统计分析。干预措施从智能手机应用程序到在线教育资源,满意度测量工具差异很大。总的来说,证据的特点是异质性和非常低的方法学质量。结论:数字健康干预可能对胃肠道内窥镜检查患者满意度产生积极影响,尽管证据质量很低,结果测量不一致。未来的研究应侧重于患者体验和满意度的标准化措施,确保稳健的研究设计,为将数字健康工具整合到内窥镜检查实践中提供信息。普洛斯彼罗注册号:CRD42023428609。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信