Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.

IF 3.8 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Hanna Gyllensten, Matilda Cederberg, Sara Alsén, Elin Blanck, Lilas Ali, Andreas Fors, Håkan Hedman, Laura Pirhonen Nørmark, Karl Swedberg, Inger Ekman
{"title":"Person-Centred Care: State-of-the-Art and Future Perspectives.","authors":"Hanna Gyllensten, Matilda Cederberg, Sara Alsén, Elin Blanck, Lilas Ali, Andreas Fors, Håkan Hedman, Laura Pirhonen Nørmark, Karl Swedberg, Inger Ekman","doi":"10.1007/s11897-025-00702-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Many countries prioritise the implementation of person-centred care. This study examines the progression of research in person-centred care, specifically focusing on using complex interventions within intricate contexts. It aims to explore how previous experiences can inform and shape subsequent projects. The review was based on five studies from our research group, encompassing 1099 patients, resulting in 41 peer-reviewed scientific publications. Most studies focused on patients suffering from chronic heart failure, as well as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additionally, interventions for acute coronary syndrome and common mental disorders were also considered. Analyses included the development of a logical model for person-centred care, an overview of partnership operationalisation, and the establishment of evaluation criteria for the trials. The analyses involved creating a coherent model for person-centred care, examining partnership operationalisation, and establishing trial evaluation criteria.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Sequential trials build upon their predecessors and add new elements. The studies conducted by clinicians in usual care and in-house by research staff were complementary, providing a deeper understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of person-centred care. Initiating, working, and safeguarding a partnership between patient and staff was possible, whether through in-person or remote communication. Evaluations followed modern research standards and incorporated past study insights for a more thorough approach. This study highlights how the cumulative experience from previous research in person-centred care informs the design and analyses of subsequent projects through an iterative learning process, particularly important for complex interventions in various health care contexts.</p>","PeriodicalId":10830,"journal":{"name":"Current Heart Failure Reports","volume":"22 1","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11991961/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Heart Failure Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-025-00702-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Many countries prioritise the implementation of person-centred care. This study examines the progression of research in person-centred care, specifically focusing on using complex interventions within intricate contexts. It aims to explore how previous experiences can inform and shape subsequent projects. The review was based on five studies from our research group, encompassing 1099 patients, resulting in 41 peer-reviewed scientific publications. Most studies focused on patients suffering from chronic heart failure, as well as patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Additionally, interventions for acute coronary syndrome and common mental disorders were also considered. Analyses included the development of a logical model for person-centred care, an overview of partnership operationalisation, and the establishment of evaluation criteria for the trials. The analyses involved creating a coherent model for person-centred care, examining partnership operationalisation, and establishing trial evaluation criteria.

Recent findings: Sequential trials build upon their predecessors and add new elements. The studies conducted by clinicians in usual care and in-house by research staff were complementary, providing a deeper understanding of the efficacy and effectiveness of person-centred care. Initiating, working, and safeguarding a partnership between patient and staff was possible, whether through in-person or remote communication. Evaluations followed modern research standards and incorporated past study insights for a more thorough approach. This study highlights how the cumulative experience from previous research in person-centred care informs the design and analyses of subsequent projects through an iterative learning process, particularly important for complex interventions in various health care contexts.

以人为本的护理:最新的和未来的观点。
审查目的:许多国家优先实施以人为本的护理。本研究考察了以人为本的护理研究的进展,特别侧重于在复杂的环境中使用复杂的干预措施。它旨在探索以前的经验如何影响和塑造后续项目。这篇综述基于我们研究小组的五项研究,涉及1099名患者,共发表了41篇同行评议的科学出版物。大多数研究集中在患有慢性心力衰竭的患者以及患有慢性阻塞性肺病的患者身上。此外,还考虑了急性冠状动脉综合征和常见精神障碍的干预措施。分析包括以人为本的护理逻辑模型的发展,伙伴关系运作的概述,以及试验评估标准的建立。分析包括为以人为本的护理创建一个连贯的模型,检查伙伴关系的运作情况,并建立试验评估标准。最近的发现:连续试验建立在前人的基础上,并增加了新的元素。临床医生在常规护理中进行的研究和内部研究人员进行的研究是互补的,对以人为本的护理的功效和效果有了更深入的了解。无论是通过面对面沟通还是远程沟通,都可以在患者和工作人员之间发起、开展和维护伙伴关系。评估遵循现代研究标准,并将过去的研究见解纳入更彻底的方法。这项研究强调了以往以人为本的护理研究的累积经验如何通过反复学习过程为后续项目的设计和分析提供信息,这对于各种卫生保健环境中的复杂干预措施尤其重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Heart Failure Reports
Current Heart Failure Reports Medicine-Emergency Medicine
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: This journal intends to provide clear, insightful, balanced contributions by international experts that review the most important, recently published clinical findings related to the diagnosis, treatment, management, and prevention of heart failure. We accomplish this aim by appointing international authorities to serve as Section Editors in key subject areas, such as investigative, pharmacologic, and nonpharmacologic therapies, pathophysiology, and prevention. Section Editors, in turn, select topics for which leading experts contribute comprehensive review articles that emphasize new developments and recently published papers of major importance, highlighted by annotated reference lists. An international Editorial Board reviews the annual table of contents, suggests articles of special interest to their country/region, and ensures that topics are current and include emerging research. Commentaries from well-known figures in the field are also provided.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信