Optimizing Ethical Care, Quality, and Safety in Long-Term Services and Supports: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.

IF 19.6 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Annals of Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-05-06 DOI:10.7326/ANNALS-24-03641
Mark Aaron Unruh, Jan K Carney, Alejandro Moreno, Lois Snyder Sulmasy
{"title":"Optimizing Ethical Care, Quality, and Safety in Long-Term Services and Supports: A Position Paper From the American College of Physicians.","authors":"Mark Aaron Unruh, Jan K Carney, Alejandro Moreno, Lois Snyder Sulmasy","doi":"10.7326/ANNALS-24-03641","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Long-term services and supports (LTSS) in the United States have faced substantial and enduring challenges. They encompass services for persons who can no longer independently care for themselves because of cognitive decline, functional limitations, chronic illness, or the sequelae of such conditions. These services are delivered in institutional and noninstitutional settings, such as nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and home- and community-based programs. This position paper by the American College of Physicians examines the ethical implications of current LTSS business models and practices and their effect on vulnerable persons receiving care in these settings. These models and practices include approaches to staffing, resource allocation, health equity, and attention to patient preferences and patient-centered care, as well as business strategies that focus on profit rather than patient care and ownership structures that can lack transparency and hinder accountability. Addressing these challenges necessitates a collaborative approach among policymakers, health care systems, researchers, physicians and other health care professionals, LTSS facility and agency owners, patients, and caregivers. By embracing shared goals through a collaborative approach, an LTSS system can be cultivated that optimizes ethical care, quality, and safety, ensuring respect for all individuals across their lifespan.</p>","PeriodicalId":7932,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"839-846"},"PeriodicalIF":19.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7326/ANNALS-24-03641","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/5/6 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Long-term services and supports (LTSS) in the United States have faced substantial and enduring challenges. They encompass services for persons who can no longer independently care for themselves because of cognitive decline, functional limitations, chronic illness, or the sequelae of such conditions. These services are delivered in institutional and noninstitutional settings, such as nursing homes, assisted living facilities, and home- and community-based programs. This position paper by the American College of Physicians examines the ethical implications of current LTSS business models and practices and their effect on vulnerable persons receiving care in these settings. These models and practices include approaches to staffing, resource allocation, health equity, and attention to patient preferences and patient-centered care, as well as business strategies that focus on profit rather than patient care and ownership structures that can lack transparency and hinder accountability. Addressing these challenges necessitates a collaborative approach among policymakers, health care systems, researchers, physicians and other health care professionals, LTSS facility and agency owners, patients, and caregivers. By embracing shared goals through a collaborative approach, an LTSS system can be cultivated that optimizes ethical care, quality, and safety, ensuring respect for all individuals across their lifespan.

优化长期服务和支持中的道德关怀、质量和安全:美国医师学会的立场文件。
美国的长期服务和支持(LTSS)面临着巨大而持久的挑战。这些服务包括为由于认知能力下降、功能限制、慢性疾病或这些疾病的后遗症而不能再独立照顾自己的人提供的服务。这些服务在机构和非机构环境中提供,如养老院、辅助生活设施、家庭和社区项目。这份由美国医师学会撰写的立场文件探讨了当前LTSS商业模式和实践的伦理含义,以及它们对在这些环境中接受护理的弱势群体的影响。这些模式和做法包括人员配置、资源分配、卫生公平、关注患者偏好和以患者为中心的护理,以及注重利润而非患者护理的商业战略,以及可能缺乏透明度和妨碍问责制的所有权结构。应对这些挑战需要决策者、卫生保健系统、研究人员、医生和其他卫生保健专业人员、LTSS设施和机构所有者、患者和护理人员之间的协作方法。通过合作的方式实现共同的目标,LTSS系统可以优化道德关怀、质量和安全,确保在整个生命周期中尊重所有个体。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Internal Medicine
Annals of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
23.90
自引率
1.80%
发文量
1136
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1927 by the American College of Physicians (ACP), Annals of Internal Medicine is the premier internal medicine journal. Annals of Internal Medicine’s mission is to promote excellence in medicine, enable physicians and other health care professionals to be well informed members of the medical community and society, advance standards in the conduct and reporting of medical research, and contribute to improving the health of people worldwide. To achieve this mission, the journal publishes a wide variety of original research, review articles, practice guidelines, and commentary relevant to clinical practice, health care delivery, public health, health care policy, medical education, ethics, and research methodology. In addition, the journal publishes personal narratives that convey the feeling and the art of medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信