Characterization of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Reference Products Approved in Japan to Reveal the Quality Characteristics in Post-approval Phase.
{"title":"Characterization of Biosimilar Monoclonal Antibodies and Their Reference Products Approved in Japan to Reveal the Quality Characteristics in Post-approval Phase.","authors":"Hiroko Shibata, Akira Harazono, Masato Kiyoshi, Yoshiro Saito, Akiko Ishii-Watabe","doi":"10.1007/s40259-025-00722-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Promoting the use of biosimilars is a global issue from the perspective of reducing medical costs. In Japan, the replacement of original biopharmaceuticals with biosimilars has not progressed as expected. To promote the use of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies, it is necessary to increase the public's understanding of biosimilars by evaluating and confirming the quality of biosimilar products. However, there are limited data to compare among multiple biosimilars and/or the reference, and among their product lots.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>In this study, we evaluated quality attributes of multiple lots of reference products and their biosimilars to determine the extent of distribution in quality attributes between products as well as the quality consistencies from lot to lot.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>As the quality attributes, the glycosylation profile, charge heterogeneity, binding affinity for the antigen and Fcγ receptors, and high-molecular-weight species and subvisible particles were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The degree of similarity in quality attributes with a reference product was different for each biosimilar product. We confirmed the differences between reference and biosimilar product reported in previous articles or review reports, and that some quality attributes of biosimilars were out of the quality ranges of reference products. Although lot-to-lot variations and trends at some degrees were observed for some products, no clear drifts among lots were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Analyzing several lots of these products enabled us to capture a profile of quality characteristics for each product. Overall, the extent of variability of each quality attribute among reference products and biosimilars was revealed by this study for the first time.</p>","PeriodicalId":9022,"journal":{"name":"BioDrugs","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioDrugs","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-025-00722-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Promoting the use of biosimilars is a global issue from the perspective of reducing medical costs. In Japan, the replacement of original biopharmaceuticals with biosimilars has not progressed as expected. To promote the use of biosimilar monoclonal antibodies, it is necessary to increase the public's understanding of biosimilars by evaluating and confirming the quality of biosimilar products. However, there are limited data to compare among multiple biosimilars and/or the reference, and among their product lots.
Objective: In this study, we evaluated quality attributes of multiple lots of reference products and their biosimilars to determine the extent of distribution in quality attributes between products as well as the quality consistencies from lot to lot.
Methods: As the quality attributes, the glycosylation profile, charge heterogeneity, binding affinity for the antigen and Fcγ receptors, and high-molecular-weight species and subvisible particles were measured.
Results: The degree of similarity in quality attributes with a reference product was different for each biosimilar product. We confirmed the differences between reference and biosimilar product reported in previous articles or review reports, and that some quality attributes of biosimilars were out of the quality ranges of reference products. Although lot-to-lot variations and trends at some degrees were observed for some products, no clear drifts among lots were observed.
Conclusion: Analyzing several lots of these products enabled us to capture a profile of quality characteristics for each product. Overall, the extent of variability of each quality attribute among reference products and biosimilars was revealed by this study for the first time.
期刊介绍:
An essential resource for R&D professionals and clinicians with an interest in biologic therapies.
BioDrugs covers the development and therapeutic application of biotechnology-based pharmaceuticals and diagnostic products for the treatment of human disease.
BioDrugs offers a range of additional enhanced features designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. Each article is accompanied by a Key Points summary, giving a time-efficient overview of the content to a wide readership. Articles may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist patients, caregivers and others in understanding important medical advances. The journal also provides the option to include various other types of enhanced features including slide sets, videos and animations. All enhanced features are peer reviewed to the same high standard as the article itself. Peer review is conducted using Editorial Manager®, supported by a database of international experts. This database is shared with other Adis journals.