Asymmetry and Spillover Effects in the Relationship Between Stock Markets and Mental Health: An Alternative Approach

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ECONOMICS
Health economics Pub Date : 2025-04-14 DOI:10.1002/hec.4968
Ruben Ruf, Jenny Berrill, Damien Cassells
{"title":"Asymmetry and Spillover Effects in the Relationship Between Stock Markets and Mental Health: An Alternative Approach","authors":"Ruben Ruf,&nbsp;Jenny Berrill,&nbsp;Damien Cassells","doi":"10.1002/hec.4968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Despite the arguments made by prospect theory, there is a lack of studies investigating asymmetric effects in the relationship between stock markets and mental health. We use the UK based Understanding Society panel dataset between 2010 and 2023 to investigate if stock market fluctuations have an asymmetric impact on mental health, and if there are mental health spillover effects on investors' household members, providing the first paper to investigate this relationship using an asymmetric fixed effects model for panel data. We find that a decreasing stock market index has a stronger impact on mental health than an increasing one, supporting prospect theory. We also suggest that prospect theory does not hold for males in explaining the relationship between stock market fluctuations and mental health. Finally, we provide novel evidence for a mental health spillover effect of negative 52-week returns on investors' household members.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12847,"journal":{"name":"Health economics","volume":"34 8","pages":"1410-1425"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hec.4968","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the arguments made by prospect theory, there is a lack of studies investigating asymmetric effects in the relationship between stock markets and mental health. We use the UK based Understanding Society panel dataset between 2010 and 2023 to investigate if stock market fluctuations have an asymmetric impact on mental health, and if there are mental health spillover effects on investors' household members, providing the first paper to investigate this relationship using an asymmetric fixed effects model for panel data. We find that a decreasing stock market index has a stronger impact on mental health than an increasing one, supporting prospect theory. We also suggest that prospect theory does not hold for males in explaining the relationship between stock market fluctuations and mental health. Finally, we provide novel evidence for a mental health spillover effect of negative 52-week returns on investors' household members.

股票市场与心理健康关系的不对称与溢出效应:一种替代方法。
尽管前景理论提出了这样的论点,但对股票市场与心理健康之间关系的不对称效应的研究还很缺乏。我们使用2010年至2023年英国的Understanding Society面板数据集来调查股票市场波动是否对心理健康产生不对称影响,以及投资者家庭成员是否存在心理健康溢出效应,提供了第一篇使用面板数据的不对称固定效应模型来研究这种关系的论文。我们发现股票市场指数下跌对心理健康的影响比上涨对心理健康的影响更大,支持前景理论。我们也认为前景理论在解释股票市场波动与心理健康之间的关系时并不适用于男性。最后,我们提供了新的证据,证明负52周收益对投资者家庭成员的心理健康溢出效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health economics
Health economics 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
4.80%
发文量
177
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: This Journal publishes articles on all aspects of health economics: theoretical contributions, empirical studies and analyses of health policy from the economic perspective. Its scope includes the determinants of health and its definition and valuation, as well as the demand for and supply of health care; planning and market mechanisms; micro-economic evaluation of individual procedures and treatments; and evaluation of the performance of health care systems. Contributions should typically be original and innovative. As a rule, the Journal does not include routine applications of cost-effectiveness analysis, discrete choice experiments and costing analyses. Editorials are regular features, these should be concise and topical. Occasionally commissioned reviews are published and special issues bring together contributions on a single topic. Health Economics Letters facilitate rapid exchange of views on topical issues. Contributions related to problems in both developed and developing countries are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信