Evaluation of BRCA1/2 testing rates in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: lessons learned from real-world clinical data.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Lieke Lanjouw, Claire J H Kramer, Arja Ter Elst, Geertruida H de Bock, Katja N Gaarenstroom, Refika Yigit, Lieke P V Berger, Christi J van Asperen, Sabrina Z Commandeur-Jan, Dimas M X van der Hall, Mathilde Jalving, Marjolein J Kagie, Nienke van der Stoep, Tom van Wezel, Marian J E Mourits, Tjalling Bosse, Joost Bart
{"title":"Evaluation of BRCA1/2 testing rates in epithelial ovarian cancer patients: lessons learned from real-world clinical data.","authors":"Lieke Lanjouw, Claire J H Kramer, Arja Ter Elst, Geertruida H de Bock, Katja N Gaarenstroom, Refika Yigit, Lieke P V Berger, Christi J van Asperen, Sabrina Z Commandeur-Jan, Dimas M X van der Hall, Mathilde Jalving, Marjolein J Kagie, Nienke van der Stoep, Tom van Wezel, Marian J E Mourits, Tjalling Bosse, Joost Bart","doi":"10.1007/s10689-025-00467-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Identification of somatic and germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients is essential for determining poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor sensitivity and genetic predisposition. In the Netherlands, BRCA1/2 testing changed to a tumor-first approach to efficiently identify both somatic and germline pathogenic variants in all patients. Here, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the first four years of the tumor-first test-pathway. Data of consecutive series of patients diagnosed with EOC in two regions were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Tumor and/or germline test data were retrieved from hospital databases. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients completing the BRCA1/2 test-pathway, defined as having a negative tumor test or a referral for a germline test in case of a positive tumor test or no tumor test. Factors associated with test-pathway completion were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis. In total, 69.8% (757/1085) completed the test-pathway. This was 74.4% in the most recent year. Younger patients, patients diagnosed in year three or four, patients with high-grade serous/high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, advanced stage disease, middle or high socioeconomic status, and patients who underwent surgery or chemotherapy, were more likely to complete the test-pathway. We report inequalities in genetic testing access in EOC patients, which highlight the need for better guideline adherence, particularly in older patients, those with low socioeconomic status, low-grade histotypes, early-stage disease and those without surgery or chemotherapy. Additionally, timely testing of patients, and testing relatives if patients cannot be tested, are crucial to increase test uptake.</p>","PeriodicalId":12336,"journal":{"name":"Familial Cancer","volume":"24 2","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053180/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Familial Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10689-025-00467-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identification of somatic and germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) patients is essential for determining poly-(ADP-ribose)-polymerase (PARP) inhibitor sensitivity and genetic predisposition. In the Netherlands, BRCA1/2 testing changed to a tumor-first approach to efficiently identify both somatic and germline pathogenic variants in all patients. Here, we performed an in-depth evaluation of the first four years of the tumor-first test-pathway. Data of consecutive series of patients diagnosed with EOC in two regions were obtained from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Tumor and/or germline test data were retrieved from hospital databases. The primary outcome was the percentage of patients completing the BRCA1/2 test-pathway, defined as having a negative tumor test or a referral for a germline test in case of a positive tumor test or no tumor test. Factors associated with test-pathway completion were identified through multivariable logistic regression analysis. In total, 69.8% (757/1085) completed the test-pathway. This was 74.4% in the most recent year. Younger patients, patients diagnosed in year three or four, patients with high-grade serous/high-grade endometrioid carcinoma, advanced stage disease, middle or high socioeconomic status, and patients who underwent surgery or chemotherapy, were more likely to complete the test-pathway. We report inequalities in genetic testing access in EOC patients, which highlight the need for better guideline adherence, particularly in older patients, those with low socioeconomic status, low-grade histotypes, early-stage disease and those without surgery or chemotherapy. Additionally, timely testing of patients, and testing relatives if patients cannot be tested, are crucial to increase test uptake.

上皮性卵巢癌患者BRCA1/2检测率的评估:来自真实世界临床数据的经验教训
鉴定上皮性卵巢癌(EOC)患者的体细胞和种系BRCA1/2致病变异对于确定聚(adp -核糖)-聚合酶(PARP)抑制剂的敏感性和遗传易感性至关重要。在荷兰,BRCA1/2检测转变为肿瘤优先的方法,以有效地识别所有患者的体细胞和种系致病变异。在这里,我们对肿瘤优先测试途径的前四年进行了深入的评估。两个地区诊断为EOC的连续系列患者的数据来自荷兰癌症登记处。肿瘤和/或生殖系检测数据从医院数据库检索。主要结果是完成BRCA1/2检测途径的患者百分比,定义为肿瘤检测阴性或肿瘤检测阳性或无肿瘤检测的情况下转诊进行种系检测。通过多变量logistic回归分析确定与测试路径完成相关的因素。总共有69.8%(757/1085)完成了测试路径。在最近一年,这一比例为74.4%。年轻患者、诊断时间为3年或4年的患者、高级别浆液性/高级别子宫内膜样癌患者、晚期疾病、中高社会经济地位以及接受手术或化疗的患者更有可能完成测试途径。我们报告了EOC患者基因检测获取的不平等,这突出了更好地遵守指南的必要性,特别是在老年患者、低社会经济地位、低级别组织型、早期疾病和未进行手术或化疗的患者中。此外,及时对患者进行检测,并在患者无法检测时对其亲属进行检测,对于增加检测的吸收至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Familial Cancer
Familial Cancer 医学-遗传学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
4.50%
发文量
36
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: In recent years clinical cancer genetics has become increasingly important. Several events, in particular the developments in DNA-based technology, have contributed to this evolution. Clinical cancer genetics has now matured to a medical discipline which is truly multidisciplinary in which clinical and molecular geneticists work together with clinical and medical oncologists as well as with psycho-social workers. Due to the multidisciplinary nature of clinical cancer genetics most papers are currently being published in a wide variety of journals on epidemiology, oncology and genetics. Familial Cancer provides a forum bringing these topics together focusing on the interests and needs of the clinician. The journal mainly concentrates on clinical cancer genetics. Most major areas in the field shall be included, such as epidemiology of familial cancer, molecular analysis and diagnosis, clinical expression, treatment and prevention, counselling and the health economics of familial cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信