Perioperative Health Care Disparities in the United States: A Systematic Review.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Steven Bradley, Timethia J Bonner, Mohanad R Youssef, Brittany N Burton, David O Warner, Abimbola O Faloye, Paloma Toledo, Adam J Milam
{"title":"Perioperative Health Care Disparities in the United States: A Systematic Review.","authors":"A Steven Bradley, Timethia J Bonner, Mohanad R Youssef, Brittany N Burton, David O Warner, Abimbola O Faloye, Paloma Toledo, Adam J Milam","doi":"10.1213/ANE.0000000000007510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Perioperative health inequities remain a critical issue, contributing to unequal patient outcomes and financial costs despite increasing awareness and efforts to address these disparities. This systematic review evaluated anesthesiology literature from 2010 to 2023 on perioperative health care disparities related to race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. The review aimed to identify gaps and propose research and opportunities for intervention. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, with studies included if they focused on perioperative disparities in the United States, were published in anesthesiology journals, and met criteria for methodological rigor. The review was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); data extraction followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Out of 1050 abstracts screened, 116 articles were reviewed for full text, with 59 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Included studies comprised retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional analyses, a case-control study, and a randomized controlled trial, covering various surgical procedures and sample sizes from 100 to over 21 million patients. Disparities were noted in peripartum management (n = 14), mortality (n = 12), complications (n = 8), regional anesthesia use (n = 6), and pain management (n = 3), with evidence of poorer outcomes in Black and Hispanic women, older adolescents, and patients who were uninsured or on Medicaid. This review highlights the persistence of significant perioperative disparities and identifies gaps, such as limited exploration of the causes of these disparities, limited examination of disparities during the preoperative and intraoperative period, and few interventions to address these identified disparities. Reducing these disparities requires stakeholder engagement, multifaceted approaches, culturally agile training for health care teams, enhanced decision support tools, and a more diverse health care workforce. Continued research and targeted interventions at individual, community, and societal levels are essential for improving perioperative outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7784,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia and analgesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia and analgesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000007510","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Perioperative health inequities remain a critical issue, contributing to unequal patient outcomes and financial costs despite increasing awareness and efforts to address these disparities. This systematic review evaluated anesthesiology literature from 2010 to 2023 on perioperative health care disparities related to race, ethnicity, gender, and socioeconomic status. The review aimed to identify gaps and propose research and opportunities for intervention. A comprehensive literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science, with studies included if they focused on perioperative disparities in the United States, were published in anesthesiology journals, and met criteria for methodological rigor. The review was registered with International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO); data extraction followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and study quality was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Out of 1050 abstracts screened, 116 articles were reviewed for full text, with 59 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Included studies comprised retrospective cohort studies, cross-sectional analyses, a case-control study, and a randomized controlled trial, covering various surgical procedures and sample sizes from 100 to over 21 million patients. Disparities were noted in peripartum management (n = 14), mortality (n = 12), complications (n = 8), regional anesthesia use (n = 6), and pain management (n = 3), with evidence of poorer outcomes in Black and Hispanic women, older adolescents, and patients who were uninsured or on Medicaid. This review highlights the persistence of significant perioperative disparities and identifies gaps, such as limited exploration of the causes of these disparities, limited examination of disparities during the preoperative and intraoperative period, and few interventions to address these identified disparities. Reducing these disparities requires stakeholder engagement, multifaceted approaches, culturally agile training for health care teams, enhanced decision support tools, and a more diverse health care workforce. Continued research and targeted interventions at individual, community, and societal levels are essential for improving perioperative outcomes.

美国围手术期医疗保健差异:系统回顾。
围手术期健康不平等仍然是一个关键问题,尽管人们越来越认识到并努力解决这些不平等,但仍造成患者结果不平等和财务成本不平等。本系统综述评估了2010年至2023年麻醉学文献中与种族、民族、性别和社会经济地位相关的围手术期医疗保健差异。审查的目的是确定差距,并提出研究和干预的机会。我们使用PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science进行了全面的文献检索,纳入了关注美国围手术期差异、发表在麻醉学期刊上、符合方法严谨性标准的研究。该综述已在国际前瞻性系统综述登记册(PROSPERO)上注册;数据提取遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,并使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估研究质量。在筛选的1050篇摘要中,116篇文章被审查为全文,其中59项研究符合纳入标准。纳入的研究包括回顾性队列研究、横断面分析、病例对照研究和随机对照试验,涵盖了各种外科手术,样本量从100万到2100多万不等。在围产期管理(n = 14)、死亡率(n = 12)、并发症(n = 8)、区域麻醉使用(n = 6)和疼痛管理(n = 3)方面存在差异,有证据表明黑人和西班牙裔妇女、年龄较大的青少年以及未投保或享受医疗补助的患者预后较差。本综述强调了围手术期显著差异的持续存在,并确定了差距,例如对这些差异原因的探索有限,术前和术中对差异的检查有限,以及针对这些已确定差异的干预措施很少。减少这些差异需要利益攸关方的参与、多方面的方法、对卫生保健团队进行文化上灵活的培训、增强决策支持工具以及更加多样化的卫生保健工作人员队伍。在个人、社区和社会层面持续研究和有针对性的干预措施对于改善围手术期预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Anesthesia and analgesia
Anesthesia and analgesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
9.90
自引率
7.00%
发文量
817
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Anesthesia & Analgesia exists for the benefit of patients under the care of health care professionals engaged in the disciplines broadly related to anesthesiology, perioperative medicine, critical care medicine, and pain medicine. The Journal furthers the care of these patients by reporting the fundamental advances in the science of these clinical disciplines and by documenting the clinical, laboratory, and administrative advances that guide therapy. Anesthesia & Analgesia seeks a balance between definitive clinical and management investigations and outstanding basic scientific reports. The Journal welcomes original manuscripts containing rigorous design and analysis, even if unusual in their approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信