Progesterone Supplementation After Cerclage Does Not Improve the Preterm Birth Rate.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lauren C Sayres, Natalie T Simon, Virginia A Lijewski, Jeanelle Sheeder, Shane A Reeves
{"title":"Progesterone Supplementation After Cerclage Does Not Improve the Preterm Birth Rate.","authors":"Lauren C Sayres, Natalie T Simon, Virginia A Lijewski, Jeanelle Sheeder, Shane A Reeves","doi":"10.1055/a-2605-7721","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The goal of this study is to evaluate whether adjuvant progesterone following cerclage affords a reduction in the rate of preterm delivery.This is a retrospective cohort review of all individuals who underwent transvaginal cerclage placement at a tertiary care academic medical center between 2005 and 2021. The rate of delivery prior to 37 weeks and several secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between patients with and without progesterone supplementation after cerclage. Multivariable regression, subgroup, and matched pairs analyses were performed in order to account for the formulation of progesterone, indication for cerclage, and other potential confounding variables. The study was powered a priori to detect a difference in our primary outcome.Among 451 patients, there were 163 history-, 135 ultrasound-, and 153 examination-indicated cerclages. Overall, 284 (63%) received adjuvant progesterone. Adjuvant progesterone was associated with an increased rate of preterm delivery before 37 weeks (45 vs. 34%, <i>p</i> = 0.03) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval: 1.14 and 2.80) in our multivariable model. The median latency from cerclage placement to delivery was shorter when progesterone was used (119 vs. 139 days, <i>p</i> < 0.001). There was no benefit of adjuvant progesterone when analyzed by formulation of progesterone or indication for cerclage or when analyzing pairs matched based on propensity score matching. There were no differences in secondary outcomes for pregnant patients or their offspring.Adjuvant progesterone does not decrease the preterm delivery rate and may in fact cause harm by decreasing latency from cerclage to delivery. Maternal and neonatal outcomes do not vary with supplemental progesterone after cerclage. Our data do not support a synergistic benefit of cerclage and postcerclage progesterone. · There are currently no guidelines for the use of progesterone after cerclage.. · Adjuvant progesterone does not decrease the preterm birth rate.. · Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes do not improve with adjuvant progesterone..</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2605-7721","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The goal of this study is to evaluate whether adjuvant progesterone following cerclage affords a reduction in the rate of preterm delivery.This is a retrospective cohort review of all individuals who underwent transvaginal cerclage placement at a tertiary care academic medical center between 2005 and 2021. The rate of delivery prior to 37 weeks and several secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared between patients with and without progesterone supplementation after cerclage. Multivariable regression, subgroup, and matched pairs analyses were performed in order to account for the formulation of progesterone, indication for cerclage, and other potential confounding variables. The study was powered a priori to detect a difference in our primary outcome.Among 451 patients, there were 163 history-, 135 ultrasound-, and 153 examination-indicated cerclages. Overall, 284 (63%) received adjuvant progesterone. Adjuvant progesterone was associated with an increased rate of preterm delivery before 37 weeks (45 vs. 34%, p = 0.03) with an adjusted odds ratio of 1.78 (95% confidence interval: 1.14 and 2.80) in our multivariable model. The median latency from cerclage placement to delivery was shorter when progesterone was used (119 vs. 139 days, p < 0.001). There was no benefit of adjuvant progesterone when analyzed by formulation of progesterone or indication for cerclage or when analyzing pairs matched based on propensity score matching. There were no differences in secondary outcomes for pregnant patients or their offspring.Adjuvant progesterone does not decrease the preterm delivery rate and may in fact cause harm by decreasing latency from cerclage to delivery. Maternal and neonatal outcomes do not vary with supplemental progesterone after cerclage. Our data do not support a synergistic benefit of cerclage and postcerclage progesterone. · There are currently no guidelines for the use of progesterone after cerclage.. · Adjuvant progesterone does not decrease the preterm birth rate.. · Secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes do not improve with adjuvant progesterone..

环扎术后补充黄体酮并不能提高早产率。
目的本研究的目的是评估环扎术后辅助黄体酮是否能降低早产率。本研究是一项回顾性队列研究,纳入了2005年至2021年间在三级医疗学术中心接受阴道环切术的所有患者。37周前的分娩率和几个次要的产妇和新生儿结局比较了环扎术后补充和不补充黄体酮的患者。进行多变量回归、亚组和配对分析,以解释黄体酮的配方、环扎的适应症和其他潜在的混杂变量。这项研究是先验的,以检测我们的主要结果的差异。结果451例患者中,163例有病史,135例有超声,153例有检查指征。总的来说,284例(63%)接受了辅助黄体酮治疗。在我们的多变量模型中,辅助孕酮与37周前早产率增加相关(45% vs . 34%, p=0.03),校正优势比为1.78(95%可信区间1.14,2.80)。当使用黄体酮时,从环扎置入到分娩的中位潜伏期更短(119天vs 139天,p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信