CT vs MRI C-Spine Imaging for C-Spine Clearance in Obtunded Patients in Low-Energy Trauma Mechanisms.

IF 1 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-18 DOI:10.1177/00031348251337146
Robert Rakosi, Jera Davis, Jordan Miller, Henry Krasner, Kavita Batra, Sukanta Maitra, Douglas R Fraser, Allison G McNickle
{"title":"CT vs MRI C-Spine Imaging for C-Spine Clearance in Obtunded Patients in Low-Energy Trauma Mechanisms.","authors":"Robert Rakosi, Jera Davis, Jordan Miller, Henry Krasner, Kavita Batra, Sukanta Maitra, Douglas R Fraser, Allison G McNickle","doi":"10.1177/00031348251337146","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundCurrent guidelines from trauma societies recommend cervical spine (c-spine) clearance for obtunded blunt trauma patients after negative CT c-spine (CS-CT). However, the value of additional c-spine MRI (CS-MRI) in patients with low-energy trauma mechanisms is unclear and controversial. This study hypothesizes that obtunded blunt low-energy mechanism trauma patients would not have c-spine injuries requiring surgery on CS-MRI after negative CS-CT.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, analyzing adults with low-energy blunt trauma from 2018-2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals over 18 years old admitted to the ICU following assault/fall 10 feet or less requiring intubation for 24+ hours. Exclusion criteria included patients with high-energy trauma or intubated later in their admission/less than 24 hours. Primary outcomes were c-spine injuries identified on MRI following negative CS-CT and percentage of patients requiring surgery. Statistical significance was set at 5%.ResultsOf 1462 charts, 300 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 300 patients, 194 underwent only CS-CT (64.7%), while 106 underwent both CT and MRI (35.3%). Among the 82 patients with negative CS-CT who received CS-MRI, only 1 (1.2%) was found to have an unstable c-spine injury. Patients who underwent CS-MRI had increased ICU length of stay (7.52 vs 11.87 days) and ventilator days (6.12 vs 9.43 days) compared CS-CT alone.DiscussionThe findings suggest that negative CS-CT is typically sufficient for clearance in low-energy trauma patients. Additional CS-MRI may increase health care resource use without revealing significant injuries, supporting streamlined c-spine clearance protocols based on trauma mechanism.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1341-1347"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251337146","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundCurrent guidelines from trauma societies recommend cervical spine (c-spine) clearance for obtunded blunt trauma patients after negative CT c-spine (CS-CT). However, the value of additional c-spine MRI (CS-MRI) in patients with low-energy trauma mechanisms is unclear and controversial. This study hypothesizes that obtunded blunt low-energy mechanism trauma patients would not have c-spine injuries requiring surgery on CS-MRI after negative CS-CT.MethodsA retrospective review was conducted at a level 1 trauma center, analyzing adults with low-energy blunt trauma from 2018-2022. Inclusion criteria encompassed individuals over 18 years old admitted to the ICU following assault/fall 10 feet or less requiring intubation for 24+ hours. Exclusion criteria included patients with high-energy trauma or intubated later in their admission/less than 24 hours. Primary outcomes were c-spine injuries identified on MRI following negative CS-CT and percentage of patients requiring surgery. Statistical significance was set at 5%.ResultsOf 1462 charts, 300 patients met inclusion criteria. Of these 300 patients, 194 underwent only CS-CT (64.7%), while 106 underwent both CT and MRI (35.3%). Among the 82 patients with negative CS-CT who received CS-MRI, only 1 (1.2%) was found to have an unstable c-spine injury. Patients who underwent CS-MRI had increased ICU length of stay (7.52 vs 11.87 days) and ventilator days (6.12 vs 9.43 days) compared CS-CT alone.DiscussionThe findings suggest that negative CS-CT is typically sufficient for clearance in low-energy trauma patients. Additional CS-MRI may increase health care resource use without revealing significant injuries, supporting streamlined c-spine clearance protocols based on trauma mechanism.

CT与MRI c -脊柱成像对低能损伤机制下钝化患者c -脊柱清除的影响。
背景:目前创伤学会的指南推荐对c- CT (CS-CT)阴性的钝性创伤患者进行颈椎(c-脊柱)清除。然而,在低能量创伤机制的患者中,额外的颈椎MRI (CS-MRI)的价值尚不清楚和有争议。本研究假设重击钝性低能机制创伤患者在CS-CT阴性后不会出现需要手术的颈椎损伤。方法对某一级创伤中心2018-2022年收治的成人低能量钝性创伤进行回顾性分析。纳入标准包括18岁以上因攻击/跌倒10英尺或以下需要插管24小时以上而入住ICU的个人。排除标准包括高能创伤或入院后/不到24小时插管的患者。主要结局是CS-CT阴性后MRI发现的颈椎损伤和需要手术的患者百分比。统计学意义设为5%。结果1462例病例中,300例符合纳入标准。300例患者中,194例仅行CS-CT检查(64.7%),106例同时行CT和MRI检查(35.3%)。82例CS-CT阴性患者行CS-MRI检查,仅有1例(1.2%)存在不稳定型颈椎损伤。与单独使用CS-CT相比,接受CS-MRI的患者ICU住院时间(7.52天vs 11.87天)和呼吸机天数(6.12天vs 9.43天)均有所增加。研究结果表明,CS-CT阴性通常足以清除低能创伤患者。额外的CS-MRI可能会增加医疗资源的使用,而不会显示严重的损伤,支持基于创伤机制的简化的颈椎清除方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信