Proportion of Time in Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracing and Adverse Outcomes.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Kristen A Cagino, Rachel L Wiley, Aaron W Roberts, Fabrizio Zullo, Hector Mendez-Figueroa, Suneet P Chauhan
{"title":"Proportion of Time in Category II Fetal Heart Rate Tracing and Adverse Outcomes.","authors":"Kristen A Cagino, Rachel L Wiley, Aaron W Roberts, Fabrizio Zullo, Hector Mendez-Figueroa, Suneet P Chauhan","doi":"10.1055/a-2601-8862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The primary objective was to ascertain if the proportion of time in category II fetal heart rate tracing (FHRT) prior to birth among term (≥ 37 weeks) singletons in labor was associated with composite adverse neonatal outcomes (CANO).The inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study were nonanomalous singletons at term, whose FHRT was reviewed by obstetricians blinded to the maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes. According to ACOG's criteria, the last 20 to 120 minutes of the tracing were reviewed in 20-minute epochs. The cohorts were divided into three groups: group A, category II for < 33% of the available tracing; group B, for ≥ 33 and <66%; and, group C, for ≥ 66% of the FHRT. CANO was any of the following: Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, mechanical ventilation, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal seizure, confirmed sepsis, or neonatal death. Group A was compared with groups B and C, using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR).FHRT for 5,160 consecutive deliveries was reviewed, and 2,780 (53.8%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 321,980 minutes of FHRT reviewed, 223,000 minutes (69.2%) were category II. The overall CANO among the cohorts was 1.4% (38/2,780), and it did not vary significantly between group A versus B (aOR: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-3.48), or between group A versus C (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.35). The overall rate of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring FHRT was 9.7% (270/2,780), and it did not differ between group A versus B (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.47) or group A versus C (aOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.73-1.91).Among term deliveries, in the last 20 to 120 minutes before birth, 70% of the time FHRT was category II, and the proportion of time in Category II did not significantly influence adverse neonatal outcomes. · In the last 20 to 120 minutes before birth, 69.2% of FHRT were category II.. · In 2,780 parturients with category II FHRT, CANO occurred in 1.4%.. · Category II FHRT, for 20 to 120 min before birth, was not assocated with adverse outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2601-8862","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The primary objective was to ascertain if the proportion of time in category II fetal heart rate tracing (FHRT) prior to birth among term (≥ 37 weeks) singletons in labor was associated with composite adverse neonatal outcomes (CANO).The inclusion criteria for this retrospective cohort study were nonanomalous singletons at term, whose FHRT was reviewed by obstetricians blinded to the maternal characteristics and neonatal outcomes. According to ACOG's criteria, the last 20 to 120 minutes of the tracing were reviewed in 20-minute epochs. The cohorts were divided into three groups: group A, category II for < 33% of the available tracing; group B, for ≥ 33 and <66%; and, group C, for ≥ 66% of the FHRT. CANO was any of the following: Apgar score < 7 at 5 minutes, mechanical ventilation, hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, neonatal seizure, confirmed sepsis, or neonatal death. Group A was compared with groups B and C, using an adjusted odds ratio (aOR).FHRT for 5,160 consecutive deliveries was reviewed, and 2,780 (53.8%) met the inclusion criteria. Of the 321,980 minutes of FHRT reviewed, 223,000 minutes (69.2%) were category II. The overall CANO among the cohorts was 1.4% (38/2,780), and it did not vary significantly between group A versus B (aOR: 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.35-3.48), or between group A versus C (aOR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.27-2.35). The overall rate of cesarean delivery for nonreassuring FHRT was 9.7% (270/2,780), and it did not differ between group A versus B (aOR: 0.86; 95% CI: 0.51-1.47) or group A versus C (aOR: 1.18; 95% CI: 0.73-1.91).Among term deliveries, in the last 20 to 120 minutes before birth, 70% of the time FHRT was category II, and the proportion of time in Category II did not significantly influence adverse neonatal outcomes. · In the last 20 to 120 minutes before birth, 69.2% of FHRT were category II.. · In 2,780 parturients with category II FHRT, CANO occurred in 1.4%.. · Category II FHRT, for 20 to 120 min before birth, was not assocated with adverse outcomes.

II类胎儿心率追踪的时间比例和不良后果。
目的:主要目的是确定足月(bb0 ~ 37周)单胎分娩前进行II类胎儿心率追踪(FHRT)的时间比例是否与新生儿综合不良结局(CANO)相关。研究设计:本回顾性队列研究的纳入标准为足月非异常单胎,其FHRT由不了解产妇特征和新生儿结局的产科医生进行评估。根据ACOG的标准,跟踪的最后20至120分钟以20分钟为一个周期进行审查。这些队列被分为3组:A组,第II类,可用追踪率< 33%;B组,占FHRT的33%和66%。CANO为以下任何一项:5分钟时Apgar评分< 7,机械通气,缺氧缺血性脑病,新生儿癫痫发作,确诊败血症或新生儿死亡。采用校正优势比(OR)将A组与B、C组进行比较。结果:回顾了5160例连续分娩的FHRT, 2780例(53.8%)符合纳入标准。在321,980分钟的FHRT中,223,000分钟(69.2%)为II类。队列间的总CANO为1.4% (38/ 2780),A组与B组(aOR 1.11, 95% CI 0.35- 3.48)、A组与C组(aOR 0.80;95% ci 0.27-2.35)。非可靠FHRT的总剖宫产率为9.7% (270/ 2780),A组与B组(aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.51-1.47)或A组与C组(aOR 1.18, 95% CI 0.73-1.91)之间无差异。结论:足月分娩中,在出生前最后20 ~ 120 min, 70%的FHRT时间为II类,II类时间所占比例对新生儿不良结局无显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信