Development of a generalised tool for evaluating success of clinical practice guidelines implementation (A-GIST).

IF 7.6 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kun Zou, Nan Yang, Siyi He, Linan Zeng, Hailong Li, Liang Huang, Qiusha Yi, Xiangyu Gao, Jiajun Ren, Mingyue Zhang, Qiang Wang, Lingli Zhang
{"title":"Development of a generalised tool for evaluating success of clinical practice guidelines implementation (A-GIST).","authors":"Kun Zou, Nan Yang, Siyi He, Linan Zeng, Hailong Li, Liang Huang, Qiusha Yi, Xiangyu Gao, Jiajun Ren, Mingyue Zhang, Qiang Wang, Lingli Zhang","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To develop a generalised tool to evaluate the success of implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>Systematic review, group brainstorming discussion and modified Delphi method.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A steering group (3 members) was assembled responsible for the guidance and ensuring stakeholder's involvement. A tool development group (24 members) of leading experts provided expertise in refining the frame and items during the development and participated in the Delphi process. And a secretary group (7 members) was responsible for the organization and coordination, systematic reviewing, drafting of the preliminary list of items, documenting and revising the tool according to the suggestions of the development group.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>Four process stages were employed. First, the project was launched with core groups formed for the development. Second, based on the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework, a systematic review of existing methods for evaluating the success of CPGs implementation and a brainstorming discussion were conducted to form a preliminary list. Third, a modified Delphi method was organised, integrating a multidisciplinary face-to-face consultation meeting with two rounds of online Delphi consultations. Fourth, the tool was revised and finalised incorporating all expert suggestions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Development teams comprising multidisciplinary experts were formed. In the systematic review, 7 biomedical literature databases were searched, and 208 pieces of literature were included. After three rounds of brainstorming discussions on items identified in the literature, a 23-item preliminary list was produced. In the modified Delphi method, 14 experts made 23 main suggestions in the face-to-face meeting on the list. 13 experts participated in the first round of Delphi consultation, reached agreement on 20 items, removed 4 items and added 1 new item. 11 experts attended the second-round consultation and had an agreement to include 20 items after revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Guideline Implementation Success Assessment Tool (A-GIST) was systematically developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the success of CPGs implementation. It comprises 5 dimensions, Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness and Maintenance, encompassing 20 items that integrate perspectives from both clinicians and patients. A-GIST is designed to facilitate evaluating, benchmarking and cross-comparison of implementation success between guidelines, facilities and regions. Additionally, it provides evidence-based insights to inform the development of targeted strategies for optimising guideline implementation practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"250-258"},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2024-113308","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To develop a generalised tool to evaluate the success of implementation of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs).

Design and setting: Systematic review, group brainstorming discussion and modified Delphi method.

Participants: A steering group (3 members) was assembled responsible for the guidance and ensuring stakeholder's involvement. A tool development group (24 members) of leading experts provided expertise in refining the frame and items during the development and participated in the Delphi process. And a secretary group (7 members) was responsible for the organization and coordination, systematic reviewing, drafting of the preliminary list of items, documenting and revising the tool according to the suggestions of the development group.

Interventions: Four process stages were employed. First, the project was launched with core groups formed for the development. Second, based on the Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework, a systematic review of existing methods for evaluating the success of CPGs implementation and a brainstorming discussion were conducted to form a preliminary list. Third, a modified Delphi method was organised, integrating a multidisciplinary face-to-face consultation meeting with two rounds of online Delphi consultations. Fourth, the tool was revised and finalised incorporating all expert suggestions.

Results: Development teams comprising multidisciplinary experts were formed. In the systematic review, 7 biomedical literature databases were searched, and 208 pieces of literature were included. After three rounds of brainstorming discussions on items identified in the literature, a 23-item preliminary list was produced. In the modified Delphi method, 14 experts made 23 main suggestions in the face-to-face meeting on the list. 13 experts participated in the first round of Delphi consultation, reached agreement on 20 items, removed 4 items and added 1 new item. 11 experts attended the second-round consultation and had an agreement to include 20 items after revision.

Conclusions: The Guideline Implementation Success Assessment Tool (A-GIST) was systematically developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the success of CPGs implementation. It comprises 5 dimensions, Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Effectiveness and Maintenance, encompassing 20 items that integrate perspectives from both clinicians and patients. A-GIST is designed to facilitate evaluating, benchmarking and cross-comparison of implementation success between guidelines, facilities and regions. Additionally, it provides evidence-based insights to inform the development of targeted strategies for optimising guideline implementation practices.

开发用于评估临床实践指南实施成功的通用工具(a - gist)。
目的:开发一种通用的工具来评估临床实践指南(CPGs)的成功实施。设计与设置:系统回顾,小组头脑风暴讨论,修正德尔菲法。参与者:组建了一个指导小组(3名成员),负责指导和确保涉众的参与。由主要专家组成的工具开发小组(24名成员)在开发过程中提供了细化框架和项目的专业知识,并参与了德尔菲过程。由秘书组(7人)负责组织协调、系统审查、起草初步项目清单,并根据开发组的建议对工具进行整理和修订。干预措施:采用四个过程阶段。首先,项目启动,形成核心开发小组。其次,基于Reach Effectiveness Adoption Implementation Maintenance framework,对现有CPGs实施成功评估方法进行系统回顾,并进行头脑风暴讨论,形成初步清单。第三,组织了一种改进的德尔菲法,将多学科面对面咨询会议与两轮在线德尔菲咨询相结合。第四,对该工具进行了修订并最终确定,纳入了所有专家建议。结果:形成了由多学科专家组成的开发团队。本系统综述检索了7个生物医学文献数据库,纳入文献208篇。在对文献中确定的项目进行了三轮头脑风暴讨论之后,产生了一份23个项目的初步清单。在改进的德尔菲法中,14位专家在清单上的面对面会议中提出了23条主要建议。13位专家参加了第一轮德尔菲咨询,就20个项目达成一致,删除4个项目,新增1个项目。11名专家参加了第2次协商,并决定修改后增加20个项目。结论:指南实施成功评估工具(a - gist)被系统地开发为评估CPGs实施成功的综合工具。它包括5个维度,即Reach、采用、实施、有效性和维护,包括20个项目,整合了临床医生和患者的观点。A-GIST的目的是促进对准则、设施和区域之间实施成功情况的评价、基准和交叉比较。此外,它提供了基于证据的见解,为优化指南实施实践的目标战略的发展提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (BMJ EBM) publishes original evidence-based research, insights and opinions on what matters for health care. We focus on the tools, methods, and concepts that are basic and central to practising evidence-based medicine and deliver relevant, trustworthy and impactful evidence. BMJ EBM is a Plan S compliant Transformative Journal and adheres to the highest possible industry standards for editorial policies and publication ethics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信