Huang Ya'nan, Zhou Jianfeng, Tang Wei, Yang Jianfeng, Zhao Zhenhua
{"title":"Accuracy of Low-Dose Chest CT-Based Artificial Intelligence Models in Osteoporosis Detection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Huang Ya'nan, Zhou Jianfeng, Tang Wei, Yang Jianfeng, Zhao Zhenhua","doi":"10.1007/s00223-025-01377-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The purpose of this study is to systematically review and evaluate the accuracy of low-dose chest CT-based artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening. A systematic literature search for relevant studies up to 13th December 2024 was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA statement. Modified QUADAS-2 was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Quantification bias metrics were extracted to evaluate the performance of the AI models for vertebrae segmentation and labeling based on low-dose chest CT images. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. To assess publication bias, Egger test and funnel plot were conducted. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore potential heterogeneity. Eight studies suitable for the analysis were included. The pooled Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for automatic vertebrae segmentation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.97). For the diagnosis of abnormal (osteoporosis + osteopenia) or osteoporosis participants, respectively, pooled sensitivities were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 0.86(95% CI 0.82-0.89); pooled specificities were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94); and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were 0.9653 and 0.9676. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified potential sources of heterogeneity, including result source (external dataset vs. internal dataset), ROI annotations (one radiologist vs. two radiologists), model developed with or without radiomics, and VBs segmentation output (included lumbar spine vs. only thoracic spine) (P < 0.05). The low-dose chest CT-based AI model shown promise information for identifying patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia who need further evaluation. Further prospective multi-center, multi-dataset studies are still required to assess the complementary role of the AI model in osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosis through low-dose chest CT images.</p>","PeriodicalId":9601,"journal":{"name":"Calcified Tissue International","volume":"116 1","pages":"67"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Calcified Tissue International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-025-01377-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to systematically review and evaluate the accuracy of low-dose chest CT-based artificial intelligence in osteoporosis screening. A systematic literature search for relevant studies up to 13th December 2024 was performed in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases. This meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the PRISMA-DTA statement. Modified QUADAS-2 was used to assess the methodological quality of the studies. Quantification bias metrics were extracted to evaluate the performance of the AI models for vertebrae segmentation and labeling based on low-dose chest CT images. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) were calculated. To assess publication bias, Egger test and funnel plot were conducted. Meta-regression and subgroup analysis were performed to explore potential heterogeneity. Eight studies suitable for the analysis were included. The pooled Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) for automatic vertebrae segmentation was 0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.97). For the diagnosis of abnormal (osteoporosis + osteopenia) or osteoporosis participants, respectively, pooled sensitivities were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 0.86(95% CI 0.82-0.89); pooled specificities were 0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94); and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were 0.9653 and 0.9676. Meta-regression and subgroup analyses identified potential sources of heterogeneity, including result source (external dataset vs. internal dataset), ROI annotations (one radiologist vs. two radiologists), model developed with or without radiomics, and VBs segmentation output (included lumbar spine vs. only thoracic spine) (P < 0.05). The low-dose chest CT-based AI model shown promise information for identifying patients with osteoporosis or osteopenia who need further evaluation. Further prospective multi-center, multi-dataset studies are still required to assess the complementary role of the AI model in osteoporosis and osteopenia diagnosis through low-dose chest CT images.
本研究旨在系统回顾和评价基于低剂量胸部ct的人工智能在骨质疏松筛查中的准确性。系统检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库中截至2024年12月13日的相关研究。本荟萃分析按照PRISMA-DTA声明进行。采用改良的QUADAS-2评估研究的方法学质量。提取量化偏倚指标,评估基于低剂量胸部CT图像的人工智能模型在椎骨分割和标记方面的性能。计算合并敏感性、特异性和曲线下面积(AUC)。为评估发表偏倚,采用Egger检验和漏斗图。meta回归和亚组分析探讨潜在的异质性。纳入了8项适合分析的研究。自动分割椎体的汇总Dice相似系数(DSC)为0.92 (95% CI 0.88-0.97)。对于异常(骨质疏松+骨质减少)或骨质疏松参与者的诊断,合并敏感性分别为0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91)和0.86(95% CI 0.82-0.89);合并特异性分别为0.90 (95% CI 0.88-0.91)和0.93 (95% CI 0.92-0.94);总受试者工作特征(SROC)曲线分别为0.9653和0.9676。meta回归和亚组分析确定了潜在的异质性来源,包括结果来源(外部数据集vs内部数据集)、ROI注释(一名放射科医生vs两名放射科医生)、有或没有放射组学开发的模型,以及VBs分割输出(包括腰椎vs仅胸椎)
期刊介绍:
Calcified Tissue International and Musculoskeletal Research publishes original research and reviews concerning the structure and function of bone, and other musculoskeletal tissues in living organisms and clinical studies of musculoskeletal disease. It includes studies of cell biology, molecular biology, intracellular signalling, and physiology, as well as research into the hormones, cytokines and other mediators that influence the musculoskeletal system. The journal also publishes clinical studies of relevance to bone disease, mineral metabolism, muscle function, and musculoskeletal interactions.