Social disadvantage and technology use among adults with type 1 diabetes in Quebec: A cross-sectional study using data from the Canadian T1D (BETTER) Registry.

IF 5.4 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Parisa Khodabandehloo, Patience Fakembe, Joyeuse Senga, Rayzel Shulman, Lorraine L Lipscombe, Holly O Witteman, Ananya Banerjee, Justin Presseau, Meranda Nakhla, Maman Joyce Dogba, Leif Erik Lovblom, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Adhiyat Najam, Wajeeha Cheema, Christine MacGibbon, Alanna Weisman
{"title":"Social disadvantage and technology use among adults with type 1 diabetes in Quebec: A cross-sectional study using data from the Canadian T1D (BETTER) Registry.","authors":"Parisa Khodabandehloo, Patience Fakembe, Joyeuse Senga, Rayzel Shulman, Lorraine L Lipscombe, Holly O Witteman, Ananya Banerjee, Justin Presseau, Meranda Nakhla, Maman Joyce Dogba, Leif Erik Lovblom, Rémi Rabasa-Lhoret, Anne-Sophie Brazeau, Adhiyat Najam, Wajeeha Cheema, Christine MacGibbon, Alanna Weisman","doi":"10.1111/dom.16426","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>We evaluated associations between social disadvantage and insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Quebec, Canada, where public funding is available for CGM but not for insulin pumps.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using self-reported survey data collected from April 2019 to October 2023. Primary exposures were social disadvantage indicators (Race, income, education, employment, insurance, immigration, rural/urban location). Primary outcomes were insulin pump and CGM use. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between social disadvantage indicators and the odds of insulin pump and CGM use.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2380 adults with T1D, 37.4% used insulin pumps and 82.5% used CGM. Insulin pump use was lower among those with income <$80 000 (odds ratio [OR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.50-0.82]), no post-secondary education (OR 0.62 [0.46-0.85]), non-White Race (OR 0.47 [0.30-0.73]) and public insurance (OR 0.47 [0.35-0.62]). CGM use was lower only among those with income <$80 000 (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.83]) and public insurance (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.83]). Odds of insulin pump and CGM use were successively lower with an increasing number of social disadvantage indicators. Insulin pump and CGM use were both associated with lower HbA1c but not severe hypoglycaemia or diabetes hospitalisation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Social disadvantage is associated with lower uptake of insulin pumps and CGM among Quebec adults with T1D, though public funding partially mitigates disparities in CGM use. Given the benefits and increasing recommendations for automated insulin delivery, strategies to increase the uptake of diabetes technologies among socially disadvantaged individuals are required.</p><p><strong>Plain language summary: </strong>Social disadvantage is linked to lower use of insulin pumps and CGM in adults with T1D in Quebec. Public funding narrows CGM disparities, but broader equity strategies are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.16426","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: We evaluated associations between social disadvantage and insulin pump and continuous glucose monitor (CGM) use among adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Quebec, Canada, where public funding is available for CGM but not for insulin pumps.

Materials and methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis using self-reported survey data collected from April 2019 to October 2023. Primary exposures were social disadvantage indicators (Race, income, education, employment, insurance, immigration, rural/urban location). Primary outcomes were insulin pump and CGM use. Logistic regression was used to assess associations between social disadvantage indicators and the odds of insulin pump and CGM use.

Results: Among 2380 adults with T1D, 37.4% used insulin pumps and 82.5% used CGM. Insulin pump use was lower among those with income <$80 000 (odds ratio [OR] 0.64 [95% confidence interval 0.50-0.82]), no post-secondary education (OR 0.62 [0.46-0.85]), non-White Race (OR 0.47 [0.30-0.73]) and public insurance (OR 0.47 [0.35-0.62]). CGM use was lower only among those with income <$80 000 (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.83]) and public insurance (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.83]). Odds of insulin pump and CGM use were successively lower with an increasing number of social disadvantage indicators. Insulin pump and CGM use were both associated with lower HbA1c but not severe hypoglycaemia or diabetes hospitalisation.

Conclusions: Social disadvantage is associated with lower uptake of insulin pumps and CGM among Quebec adults with T1D, though public funding partially mitigates disparities in CGM use. Given the benefits and increasing recommendations for automated insulin delivery, strategies to increase the uptake of diabetes technologies among socially disadvantaged individuals are required.

Plain language summary: Social disadvantage is linked to lower use of insulin pumps and CGM in adults with T1D in Quebec. Public funding narrows CGM disparities, but broader equity strategies are needed.

魁北克成人1型糖尿病患者的社会劣势和技术使用:一项使用加拿大T1D (BETTER)登记处数据的横断面研究。
目的:我们评估了加拿大魁北克省1型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者中社会劣势与胰岛素泵和连续血糖监测仪(CGM)使用之间的关系,那里有公共资金用于CGM,但没有用于胰岛素泵。材料和方法:我们使用2019年4月至2023年10月收集的自报告调查数据进行横断面分析。主要暴露是社会劣势指标(种族、收入、教育、就业、保险、移民、农村/城市位置)。主要结局是胰岛素泵和CGM的使用。使用Logistic回归来评估社会劣势指标与胰岛素泵和CGM使用几率之间的关系。结果:2380例成人T1D患者中,37.4%使用胰岛素泵,82.5%使用CGM。结论:社会劣势与魁北克成年T1D患者胰岛素泵和CGM的较低摄取有关,尽管公共资金部分缓解了CGM使用的差异。鉴于自动化胰岛素输送的益处和越来越多的建议,需要制定策略,增加社会弱势群体对糖尿病技术的吸收。简单的语言总结:社会劣势与魁北克成年T1D患者胰岛素泵和CGM的低使用率有关。公共资金缩小了CGM的差距,但需要更广泛的股权战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信