Implications of pharmacy student involvement in collecting the best possible medication histories in hospital settings: A scoping review.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Ivana Tadic, Julia Alexandra Schintler, Anita Elaine Weidmann
{"title":"Implications of pharmacy student involvement in collecting the best possible medication histories in hospital settings: A scoping review.","authors":"Ivana Tadic, Julia Alexandra Schintler, Anita Elaine Weidmann","doi":"10.1093/ajhp/zxaf101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Disclaimer: </strong>In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To assess the current extent of pharmacy students' involvement in collecting best possible medication histories (BPMHs) in different hospital settings, as well as the accuracy and financial implications of the collected BPMHs.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>A scoping review methodology was conducted following best-practice Cochrane guidance with findings reported using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. An appropriate search string was developed followed by a search across databases: PubMed, PubPharm, LIVIVO, PubMed Central, and Web of Science. All selected studies were published between 2000 and 2023 and met the predetermined inclusion criteria. After removing duplicates and independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 20 papers were retained. The highest number of original research papers originated from the US (n = 13, 72%). In these papers, the number of patients whose medication histories were collected ranged from 40 to 4,070 (mean, 504.6) and the number of pharmacy students who collected BPMHs ranged from 2 to 71 (mean, 17.8). Students obtained BPMHs alone or in a team with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Several papers described additional training for students. The information sources used were face-to-face patient interviews, data from community pharmacies, and interviews with HCPs and caregivers. Studies demonstrated that students can accurately collect BPMHs, identify unintentional discrepancies, and suggest healthcare interventions. Two studies identified notable cost savings from clinical interventions by pharmacy students.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pharmacy students can accurately collect BPMHs. The results of this scoping review can inform the development of pharmacy curricula to enhance students' competencies and student pharmacy services that can contribute to patients' safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7577,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajhp/zxaf101","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Disclaimer: In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time.

Purpose: To assess the current extent of pharmacy students' involvement in collecting best possible medication histories (BPMHs) in different hospital settings, as well as the accuracy and financial implications of the collected BPMHs.

Summary: A scoping review methodology was conducted following best-practice Cochrane guidance with findings reported using the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. An appropriate search string was developed followed by a search across databases: PubMed, PubPharm, LIVIVO, PubMed Central, and Web of Science. All selected studies were published between 2000 and 2023 and met the predetermined inclusion criteria. After removing duplicates and independent screening of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 20 papers were retained. The highest number of original research papers originated from the US (n = 13, 72%). In these papers, the number of patients whose medication histories were collected ranged from 40 to 4,070 (mean, 504.6) and the number of pharmacy students who collected BPMHs ranged from 2 to 71 (mean, 17.8). Students obtained BPMHs alone or in a team with healthcare professionals (HCPs). Several papers described additional training for students. The information sources used were face-to-face patient interviews, data from community pharmacies, and interviews with HCPs and caregivers. Studies demonstrated that students can accurately collect BPMHs, identify unintentional discrepancies, and suggest healthcare interventions. Two studies identified notable cost savings from clinical interventions by pharmacy students.

Conclusion: Pharmacy students can accurately collect BPMHs. The results of this scoping review can inform the development of pharmacy curricula to enhance students' competencies and student pharmacy services that can contribute to patients' safety.

药学专业学生参与收集医院最佳用药史的意义:范围综述。
免责声明:为了加快文章的发表,AJHP在接受稿件后将尽快在网上发布。被接受的稿件已经过同行评审和编辑,但在技术格式化和作者校对之前会在网上发布。这些手稿不是记录的最终版本,稍后将被最终文章(按照AJHP风格格式化并由作者校对)所取代。目的:评估目前药学专业学生在不同医院环境中参与收集最佳可能用药史(BPMHs)的程度,以及收集的BPMHs的准确性和经济意义。摘要:根据最佳实践Cochrane指南进行了范围评价方法,并使用PRISMA扩展范围评价报告了结果。开发了一个合适的搜索字符串,然后跨数据库进行搜索:PubMed, PubPharm, LIVIVO, PubMed Central和Web of Science。所有入选的研究均发表于2000年至2023年之间,并符合预定的纳入标准。在删除重复和独立筛选标题、摘要和全文后,保留了20篇论文。来自美国的原创研究论文数量最多(n = 13, 72%)。收集患者用药史的人数为40 ~ 4070人(平均504.6人),收集bpmh的药学专业学生人数为2 ~ 71人(平均17.8人)。学生单独或与医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)合作获得BPMHs。几篇论文描述了对学生的额外训练。使用的信息来源是面对面的患者访谈,来自社区药房的数据,以及对医护人员和护理人员的访谈。研究表明,学生可以准确地收集bpmh,识别无意的差异,并提出医疗保健干预措施。两项研究表明,药学专业学生的临床干预可以显著节省成本。结论:药学专业学生可准确采集BPMHs。这一范围审查的结果可以为药学课程的发展提供信息,以提高学生的能力和学生药学服务,从而有助于患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
18.50%
发文量
341
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy (AJHP) is the official publication of the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP). It publishes peer-reviewed scientific papers on contemporary drug therapy and pharmacy practice innovations in hospitals and health systems. With a circulation of more than 43,000, AJHP is the most widely recognized and respected clinical pharmacy journal in the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信