Stewart's theory and acid-base changes induced by crystalloid infusion in humans: a randomized physiological trial.

IF 5.7 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Antonio Maria Dell'Anna, Domenico Luca Grieco, Cristina Dominedò, Marta Cicetti, Irene Cisterna, Rossano Festa, Rosa Lamacchia, Giuseppina Giannì, Nicoletta Filetici, Teresa Michi, Cristina Rossi, Francesca Danila Alcaro, Alessandro Mele, Aurora Rocchi, Demetrio Del Prete, Maria Concetta Meluzio, Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli, Marco Rossi, Massimo Antonelli
{"title":"Stewart's theory and acid-base changes induced by crystalloid infusion in humans: a randomized physiological trial.","authors":"Antonio Maria Dell'Anna, Domenico Luca Grieco, Cristina Dominedò, Marta Cicetti, Irene Cisterna, Rossano Festa, Rosa Lamacchia, Giuseppina Giannì, Nicoletta Filetici, Teresa Michi, Cristina Rossi, Francesca Danila Alcaro, Alessandro Mele, Aurora Rocchi, Demetrio Del Prete, Maria Concetta Meluzio, Francesco Ciro Tamburrelli, Marco Rossi, Massimo Antonelli","doi":"10.1186/s13613-025-01473-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stewart's acid-base theory states that, under isocapnic conditions, crystalloid infusion affects plasma pH due to changes in strong ion difference and total weak acid concentration: a comprehensive study also assessing renal response and hemodilution effects has not been conducted in humans. We aimed to evaluate Stewart's approach during crystalloid infusion in humans.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this randomized trial, patients undergoing surgery with minimal blood losses were randomized to receive to normal saline (chloride content 154 mEq/L, strong ion difference 0 mEq/L), lactated Ringer's (chloride content 112 mEq/L, strong ion difference 29 mEq/L) or Crystalsol (chloride content 98 mEq/L, strong ion difference 50 mEq/L): patients received 10 ml/kg immediately after intubation, and 20 ml/kg after 2 h. Plasma/urinary acid-base and electrolytes were measured before study start and then at prespecified timepoints. The primary endpoint was pH one hour after the second fluid bolus: secondary outcomes included urinary/plasmatic electrolyte concentrations and strong ion difference during the study.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-five patients were enrolled (15 in each group). The extent of hemodilution achieved with the first (median [Interquartile range]: saline 9% [6-15], Ringer's 7% [4-9], Crystalsol 8% [5-12]) and the second fluid bolus (saline 13% [5-17], Ringer's 12% [9-15], Crystalsol 15% [10-20]) was not different between groups (p = 0.39 and p = 0.19, respectively). Patients in saline group received more chloride (449 mEq [383-495]) vs. Ringer's (358 mEq [297-419]) and Crystalsol groups (318 mEq [240-366]) (p = 0.001). One hour after the second bolus, pH was lower in saline group (7.34 [7.32-7.36]) vs. Ringer's (7.40 [7.35-7.43) and Crystalsol groups (7.42 [7.38-7.44]) (both p < 0.01), since plasma chloride increased significantly over time in saline group but not in Ringer's and Crystalsol groups. Overall chloride urinary excretion was not different between study groups (saline 36 mEq [28-64], Ringer's 42 mEq [29-68], Crystalsol 44 mEq [27-56], p = 0.60) but, at the end of experiments, urinary chloride concentration was higher and diuresis was lower in saline group vs. Ringer's and Crystalsol groups (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Consistent with Stewart's approach, crystalloid solutions with high chloride content lower pH due to reduced strong ion difference, progressive hemodilutional acidosis and limited renal response to chloride load.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03507062) on April, 24th 2018.</p>","PeriodicalId":7966,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Intensive Care","volume":"15 1","pages":"54"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12014888/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-025-01473-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stewart's acid-base theory states that, under isocapnic conditions, crystalloid infusion affects plasma pH due to changes in strong ion difference and total weak acid concentration: a comprehensive study also assessing renal response and hemodilution effects has not been conducted in humans. We aimed to evaluate Stewart's approach during crystalloid infusion in humans.

Methods: In this randomized trial, patients undergoing surgery with minimal blood losses were randomized to receive to normal saline (chloride content 154 mEq/L, strong ion difference 0 mEq/L), lactated Ringer's (chloride content 112 mEq/L, strong ion difference 29 mEq/L) or Crystalsol (chloride content 98 mEq/L, strong ion difference 50 mEq/L): patients received 10 ml/kg immediately after intubation, and 20 ml/kg after 2 h. Plasma/urinary acid-base and electrolytes were measured before study start and then at prespecified timepoints. The primary endpoint was pH one hour after the second fluid bolus: secondary outcomes included urinary/plasmatic electrolyte concentrations and strong ion difference during the study.

Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled (15 in each group). The extent of hemodilution achieved with the first (median [Interquartile range]: saline 9% [6-15], Ringer's 7% [4-9], Crystalsol 8% [5-12]) and the second fluid bolus (saline 13% [5-17], Ringer's 12% [9-15], Crystalsol 15% [10-20]) was not different between groups (p = 0.39 and p = 0.19, respectively). Patients in saline group received more chloride (449 mEq [383-495]) vs. Ringer's (358 mEq [297-419]) and Crystalsol groups (318 mEq [240-366]) (p = 0.001). One hour after the second bolus, pH was lower in saline group (7.34 [7.32-7.36]) vs. Ringer's (7.40 [7.35-7.43) and Crystalsol groups (7.42 [7.38-7.44]) (both p < 0.01), since plasma chloride increased significantly over time in saline group but not in Ringer's and Crystalsol groups. Overall chloride urinary excretion was not different between study groups (saline 36 mEq [28-64], Ringer's 42 mEq [29-68], Crystalsol 44 mEq [27-56], p = 0.60) but, at the end of experiments, urinary chloride concentration was higher and diuresis was lower in saline group vs. Ringer's and Crystalsol groups (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, respectively).

Conclusions: Consistent with Stewart's approach, crystalloid solutions with high chloride content lower pH due to reduced strong ion difference, progressive hemodilutional acidosis and limited renal response to chloride load.

Trial registration: Registered on clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03507062) on April, 24th 2018.

斯图尔特的理论和晶体输注引起的人体酸碱变化:一项随机生理试验。
背景:Stewart酸碱理论认为,在等容条件下,晶体输注通过强离子差和总弱酸浓度的变化影响血浆pH值:尚未在人体中进行评估肾脏反应和血液稀释效应的全面研究。我们的目的是评估斯图尔特的方法在人类晶体输注。方法:在该随机试验中,接受最小失血量手术的患者随机接受生理盐水(氯化物含量154 mEq/L,强离子差0 mEq/L)、乳酸林格盐(氯化物含量112 mEq/L,强离子差29 mEq/L)或Crystalsol(氯化物含量98 mEq/L,强离子差50 mEq/L)。患者插管后立即给予10 ml/kg, 2 h后给予20 ml/kg。在研究开始前和在预先指定的时间点测量血浆/尿酸碱和电解质。主要终点是第二次输液后1小时的pH值;次要终点包括研究期间尿/血浆电解质浓度和强离子差异。结果:入组患者45例(每组15例)。第一次液体丸达到的血液稀释程度(中位数[四分位数范围]:生理盐水9%[6-15],林格氏7% [4-9],Crystalsol 8%[5-12])和第二次液体丸(生理盐水13%[5-17],林格氏12% [9-15],Crystalsol 15%[10-20])在组间无差异(p = 0.39和p = 0.19)。生理盐水组(449 mEq[383-495])高于林格组(358 mEq[297-419])和Crystalsol组(318 mEq [240-366]) (p = 0.001)。第二次给药后1小时,生理盐水组pH值(7.34[7.32-7.36])低于Ringer组(7.40[7.35-7.43])和Crystalsol组(7.42 [7.38-7.44])(p)。结论:与Stewart方法一致,高氯化物含量的晶体溶液由于强离子差减少、进行性血液稀释性酸中毒和对氯化物负荷的肾脏反应有限,pH值降低。试验注册:于2018年4月24日在clinicaltrials.gov注册(NCT03507062)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Intensive Care
Annals of Intensive Care CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE-
CiteScore
14.20
自引率
3.70%
发文量
107
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Intensive Care is an online peer-reviewed journal that publishes high-quality review articles and original research papers in the field of intensive care medicine. It targets critical care providers including attending physicians, fellows, residents, nurses, and physiotherapists, who aim to enhance their knowledge and provide optimal care for their patients. The journal's articles are included in various prestigious databases such as CAS, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, Journal Citation Reports/Science Edition, OCLC, PubMed, PubMed Central, Science Citation Index Expanded, SCOPUS, and Summon by Serial Solutions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信