Personalized Digital, Multilevel Program for Preparation and Early Recovery After Urologic Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pre- and Postintervention Trial.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Alessandro Uleri, Michael Baboudjian, Gilles Pasticier, Victor Basset, Guillaume Cordier, Bernard Malavaud, Pourya Pashootan, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Guillaume Ploussard
{"title":"Personalized Digital, Multilevel Program for Preparation and Early Recovery After Urologic Surgery: A Prospective, Multicenter, Pre- and Postintervention Trial.","authors":"Alessandro Uleri, Michael Baboudjian, Gilles Pasticier, Victor Basset, Guillaume Cordier, Bernard Malavaud, Pourya Pashootan, Jean-Baptiste Beauval, Guillaume Ploussard","doi":"10.1016/j.euf.2025.02.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objective: </strong>Electronic health can help improve perioperative outcomes and overcome organizational constraints related to human resources and health care-related costs. This study assesses the impact of implementing a digital smartphone app pathway with pre-/rehabilitation programs, checklists, and electronic patient-reported outcomes, on perioperative outcomes following urologic surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this prospective, multicenter, pre- and postintervention trial, we evaluated the impact of an app-based digital pathway. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications. The secondary endpoints were hospital stay, readmission and same-day discharge rates, number of days out of hospital, prolonged care at discharge, unplanned visits, and patient satisfaction. All endpoints were collected within 3 mo after surgery.</p><p><strong>Key findings and limitations: </strong>Overall, 415 consecutive patients were included in the analysis: 208 before and 207 after the digital program implementation. Overall complications were lower in the intervention group (15% vs 28.4%; p < 0.001), as well as the major complications (1.9% vs 5.8%; p = 0.048). A reduction was also noticed in unplanned visits (1.9% vs 12.5%; p < 0.001) and readmission (5.3% vs 10.6%; p = 0.048). The need for prolonged care after discharge was reduced (13% vs 26.9%; p < 0.001) in the intervention group. The median patient satisfaction was 8/10 (5-9) before and 9/10 (9-10) after implementing the app pathway (p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions and clinical implications: </strong>The implementation of a digital pathway with pre-/rehabilitation, and checklists, was associated with better postoperative outcomes, faster recovery, and improved patient satisfaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":12160,"journal":{"name":"European urology focus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European urology focus","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.02.008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objective: Electronic health can help improve perioperative outcomes and overcome organizational constraints related to human resources and health care-related costs. This study assesses the impact of implementing a digital smartphone app pathway with pre-/rehabilitation programs, checklists, and electronic patient-reported outcomes, on perioperative outcomes following urologic surgery.

Methods: In this prospective, multicenter, pre- and postintervention trial, we evaluated the impact of an app-based digital pathway. The primary endpoint was the rate of postoperative complications. The secondary endpoints were hospital stay, readmission and same-day discharge rates, number of days out of hospital, prolonged care at discharge, unplanned visits, and patient satisfaction. All endpoints were collected within 3 mo after surgery.

Key findings and limitations: Overall, 415 consecutive patients were included in the analysis: 208 before and 207 after the digital program implementation. Overall complications were lower in the intervention group (15% vs 28.4%; p < 0.001), as well as the major complications (1.9% vs 5.8%; p = 0.048). A reduction was also noticed in unplanned visits (1.9% vs 12.5%; p < 0.001) and readmission (5.3% vs 10.6%; p = 0.048). The need for prolonged care after discharge was reduced (13% vs 26.9%; p < 0.001) in the intervention group. The median patient satisfaction was 8/10 (5-9) before and 9/10 (9-10) after implementing the app pathway (p < 0.001).

Conclusions and clinical implications: The implementation of a digital pathway with pre-/rehabilitation, and checklists, was associated with better postoperative outcomes, faster recovery, and improved patient satisfaction.

泌尿外科手术后准备和早期恢复的个性化数字化多层次方案:一项前瞻性、多中心、干预前后试验。
背景与目的:电子医疗有助于改善围手术期结果,克服人力资源和卫生保健相关成本方面的组织限制。本研究评估了实施数字智能手机应用程序路径与术前/康复计划、检查清单和电子患者报告结果对泌尿外科手术围手术期结果的影响。方法:在这项前瞻性、多中心、干预前后试验中,我们评估了基于应用程序的数字途径的影响。主要终点是术后并发症的发生率。次要终点是住院时间、再入院率和当日出院率、出院天数、出院时延长的护理时间、计划外就诊和患者满意度。所有终点均在术后3个月内收集。主要发现和局限性:总体而言,415名连续患者被纳入分析:208名患者在数字化项目实施前,207名患者在实施后。干预组总并发症较低(15% vs 28.4%;p结论和临床意义:实施带有预/康复和检查清单的数字路径与更好的术后结果、更快的恢复和更高的患者满意度相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European urology focus
European urology focus Medicine-Urology
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
274
审稿时长
23 days
期刊介绍: European Urology Focus is a new sister journal to European Urology and an official publication of the European Association of Urology (EAU). EU Focus will publish original articles, opinion piece editorials and topical reviews on a wide range of urological issues such as oncology, functional urology, reconstructive urology, laparoscopy, robotic surgery, endourology, female urology, andrology, paediatric urology and sexual medicine. The editorial team welcome basic and translational research articles in the field of urological diseases. Authors may be solicited by the Editor directly. All submitted manuscripts will be peer-reviewed by a panel of experts before being considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信