Effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus non-surgery on patient-reported hip function at 3 months: a target trial emulation study of patients with osteoarthritis.
Amanda D Klaassen, Wiard Jorritsma, Nienke W Willigenburg, Carina L E Gerritsma, Bas L E F Ten Have, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Maaike G J Gademan, Rolf H H Groenwold, Rudolf W Poolman
{"title":"Effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty versus non-surgery on patient-reported hip function at 3 months: a target trial emulation study of patients with osteoarthritis.","authors":"Amanda D Klaassen, Wiard Jorritsma, Nienke W Willigenburg, Carina L E Gerritsma, Bas L E F Ten Have, Dirk Jan F Moojen, Maaike G J Gademan, Rolf H H Groenwold, Rudolf W Poolman","doi":"10.2340/17453674.2025.43332","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong> This study introduces an innovative research design in the field of orthopedics, using a target trial emulation approach. We aimed to assess the causal effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with nonoperative treatment in reducing patient-reported hip disability at 3 months in patients with osteoarthritis, using real-world data.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> We emulated a target trial using real-world data of 2 Dutch hospitals between April 2020 and January 2022. Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis and eligible for primary THA were included in the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, THA was often cancelled due to external factors (i.e., limited operating room capacity, or surgeon unavailable due to quarantine rules), resulting in an arbitrary allocation of patients to THA (n = 132) or non-THA (n = 60). We compared changes in hip disability, measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short form (HOOS-PS), between the THA group at 3 months postoperatively and the non-THA group at ≥3 months post waiting-list. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to compare between-group differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> THA showed preferable outcomes compared with non-THA, indicated by a difference of -33 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -37 to -28) on the HOOS-PS. Patients in the THA group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in hip function, with a mean change of -27 points (CI -31 to -24), while the control group showed no improvement with a mean change of 7 points (CI 3-11) on the HOOS-PS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> THA significantly improves hip function in osteoarthritis patients, surpassing the outcomes observed in the non-surgery group.</p>","PeriodicalId":6916,"journal":{"name":"Acta Orthopaedica","volume":"96 ","pages":"310-316"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11995426/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Orthopaedica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/17453674.2025.43332","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background and purpose: This study introduces an innovative research design in the field of orthopedics, using a target trial emulation approach. We aimed to assess the causal effects of total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared with nonoperative treatment in reducing patient-reported hip disability at 3 months in patients with osteoarthritis, using real-world data.
Methods: We emulated a target trial using real-world data of 2 Dutch hospitals between April 2020 and January 2022. Patients diagnosed with hip osteoarthritis and eligible for primary THA were included in the study. During the COVID-19 pandemic, THA was often cancelled due to external factors (i.e., limited operating room capacity, or surgeon unavailable due to quarantine rules), resulting in an arbitrary allocation of patients to THA (n = 132) or non-THA (n = 60). We compared changes in hip disability, measured using the Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical function Short form (HOOS-PS), between the THA group at 3 months postoperatively and the non-THA group at ≥3 months post waiting-list. Linear regression analysis, adjusting for potential confounders, was used to compare between-group differences.
Results: THA showed preferable outcomes compared with non-THA, indicated by a difference of -33 points (95% confidence interval [CI] -37 to -28) on the HOOS-PS. Patients in the THA group demonstrated a clinically significant improvement in hip function, with a mean change of -27 points (CI -31 to -24), while the control group showed no improvement with a mean change of 7 points (CI 3-11) on the HOOS-PS.
Conclusion: THA significantly improves hip function in osteoarthritis patients, surpassing the outcomes observed in the non-surgery group.
期刊介绍:
Acta Orthopaedica (previously Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica) presents original articles of basic research interest, as well as clinical studies in the field of orthopedics and related sub disciplines. Ever since the journal was founded in 1930, by a group of Scandinavian orthopedic surgeons, the journal has been published for an international audience. Acta Orthopaedica is owned by the Nordic Orthopaedic Federation and is the official publication of this federation.