Axillary Lymph Node Dissection With and Without Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Association With Drain Days and Seromas.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
American Surgeon Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-04-15 DOI:10.1177/00031348251332692
Samantha J Brown, Sarah A McLaughlin, Judy C Boughey, Antonio J Forte, Tina J Hieken, Mara A Piltin, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Zhuo Li, Monica M Price, James W Jakub
{"title":"Axillary Lymph Node Dissection With and Without Immediate Lymphatic Reconstruction: Association With Drain Days and Seromas.","authors":"Samantha J Brown, Sarah A McLaughlin, Judy C Boughey, Antonio J Forte, Tina J Hieken, Mara A Piltin, Aparna Vijayasekaran, Zhuo Li, Monica M Price, James W Jakub","doi":"10.1177/00031348251332692","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) via lymphovenous anastomosis is performed in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to minimize the risk of lymphedema. Following ALND, drains are placed to prevent seromas, while prolonged drain days are associated with increased risk of infection. The study aim was to determine the impact of ILR on the number of drain days following ALND in patients with breast cancer.<b>Methods:</b> We report a post-hoc analysis of a prospective trial (April 2018-January 2023) comparing patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND with ILR (intervention arm) vs ALND without ILR (control arm). Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable quantile regression models evaluated the difference in drain days and days until drain removal criteria were met with covariates adjusted.<b>Results:</b> Data from 214 patients were analyzed (n = 115 interventional arm, n = 99 control arm). The intervention arm had a median of 15 axillary drain days compared to 11 days in the control arm (<i>P</i> = .001). There was no significant difference between groups when measuring drain days based on the date the drain met removal criteria, rather than actual drain removal date. Seroma incidence was lower in the intervention arm (3.5%) vs the control arm (12.1%) (<i>P</i> = .017) without a statistical difference in incidence of infection.<b>Conclusion:</b> ALND with ILR does not decrease the number of drain days compared to ALND without ILR in patients with breast cancer, although we found the incidence of seromas to be lower without increase in incidence of infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7782,"journal":{"name":"American Surgeon","volume":" ","pages":"1323-1330"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Surgeon","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00031348251332692","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immediate lymphatic reconstruction (ILR) via lymphovenous anastomosis is performed in patients undergoing axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) to minimize the risk of lymphedema. Following ALND, drains are placed to prevent seromas, while prolonged drain days are associated with increased risk of infection. The study aim was to determine the impact of ILR on the number of drain days following ALND in patients with breast cancer.Methods: We report a post-hoc analysis of a prospective trial (April 2018-January 2023) comparing patients with breast cancer who underwent ALND with ILR (intervention arm) vs ALND without ILR (control arm). Wilcoxon rank sum test and chi-squared or Fisher's exact tests compared continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Multivariable quantile regression models evaluated the difference in drain days and days until drain removal criteria were met with covariates adjusted.Results: Data from 214 patients were analyzed (n = 115 interventional arm, n = 99 control arm). The intervention arm had a median of 15 axillary drain days compared to 11 days in the control arm (P = .001). There was no significant difference between groups when measuring drain days based on the date the drain met removal criteria, rather than actual drain removal date. Seroma incidence was lower in the intervention arm (3.5%) vs the control arm (12.1%) (P = .017) without a statistical difference in incidence of infection.Conclusion: ALND with ILR does not decrease the number of drain days compared to ALND without ILR in patients with breast cancer, although we found the incidence of seromas to be lower without increase in incidence of infection.

腋窝淋巴结清扫伴或不伴立即淋巴重建:与引流天数和血清肿的关系。
背景:腋窝淋巴结清扫术(ALND)患者通过淋巴静脉吻合术进行即时淋巴重建(ILR),以尽量减少淋巴水肿的风险。在ALND后,放置引流管以防止血清肿,而延长引流天数与感染风险增加有关。该研究的目的是确定ILR对乳腺癌患者ALND后引流天数的影响。方法:我们报告了一项前瞻性试验(2018年4月至2023年1月)的事后分析,该试验比较了乳腺癌患者接受了带有ILR的ALND(干预组)和没有ILR的ALND(对照组)。Wilcoxon秩和检验和卡方检验或Fisher精确检验分别比较连续变量和分类变量。多变量分位数回归模型评估了排水天数和达到排水标准的天数的差异,并调整了协变量。结果:214例患者的数据被分析(介入组115例,对照组99例)。干预组腋窝引流平均时间为15天,对照组为11天(P = 0.001)。当根据排水管达到清除标准的日期而不是实际的排水管清除日期来测量排水管天数时,两组之间没有显著差异。干预组血肿发生率(3.5%)低于对照组(12.1%)(P = 0.017),感染发生率无统计学差异。结论:与不含ILR的乳腺癌患者相比,ALND合并ILR并没有减少引流天数,尽管我们发现血清肿的发生率较低,但感染的发生率没有增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Surgeon
American Surgeon 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
623
期刊介绍: The American Surgeon is a monthly peer-reviewed publication published by the Southeastern Surgical Congress. Its area of concentration is clinical general surgery, as defined by the content areas of the American Board of Surgery: alimentary tract (including bariatric surgery), abdomen and its contents, breast, skin and soft tissue, endocrine system, solid organ transplantation, pediatric surgery, surgical critical care, surgical oncology (including head and neck surgery), trauma and emergency surgery, and vascular surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信