Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in buprenorphine treatment from emergency departments by discharge diagnosis.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Neeraj Chhabra, Dale Smith, Natalie Parde, Nicole Hsing-Smith, Joseph M Bianco, R Andrew Taylor, Gail D'Onofrio, Niranjan S Karnik
{"title":"Racial, ethnic, and sex disparities in buprenorphine treatment from emergency departments by discharge diagnosis.","authors":"Neeraj Chhabra, Dale Smith, Natalie Parde, Nicole Hsing-Smith, Joseph M Bianco, R Andrew Taylor, Gail D'Onofrio, Niranjan S Karnik","doi":"10.1111/acem.70035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Racial and sex disparities are noted in the administration and prescribing of buprenorphine from emergency departments (EDs) nationally. It is unknown whether disparities persist when accounting for the specific discharge diagnosis addressed during encounters such as opioid overdose or withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of opioid-related ED encounters from January 2020 through December 2023 using a national database, Epic Cosmos. We analyzed the effect of opioid encounter subtype-overdose or withdrawal-on receipt of buprenorphine using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for demographics and measured confounding variables. Encounter subtypes were defined by diagnosis codes and buprenorphine receipt was defined as administration or prescribing. We evaluated for racial, ethnic, and sex disparities within encounter subtypes for withdrawal and overdose.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We examined 1,088,033 opioid-related encounters. Adjusted odds for buprenorphine receipt were greater for encounters involving withdrawal (odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI 2.18-2.26), though reduced for overdose (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.51-0.53) and other opioid complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.70). Males were more likely to receive buprenorphine (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.19) than females. All racial minorities excepting American Indian/Native American patients (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08) were less likely to receive buprenorphine than White patients (Asian OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.81; Black OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79-0.81; Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89). Subtype analyses indicated decreased odds for buprenorphine receipt for female patients across all subtypes. An increased odds for buprenorphine receipt among Black patients (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07; ref. White race) was noted in encounters involving opioid withdrawal but disparities persisted for opioid overdose.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The administration and prescribing of buprenorphine in the ED is heavily influenced by the presence of opioid withdrawal. Disparities disadvantage female patients and racial minorities. Some racial disparities, particularly among Black patients, are not evident when solely considering encounters involving opioid withdrawal. System-level interventions are needed to address disparities and improve the equitable uptake of ED-initiated buprenorphine.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70035","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Racial and sex disparities are noted in the administration and prescribing of buprenorphine from emergency departments (EDs) nationally. It is unknown whether disparities persist when accounting for the specific discharge diagnosis addressed during encounters such as opioid overdose or withdrawal.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional analysis of opioid-related ED encounters from January 2020 through December 2023 using a national database, Epic Cosmos. We analyzed the effect of opioid encounter subtype-overdose or withdrawal-on receipt of buprenorphine using multivariable logistic regression adjusting for demographics and measured confounding variables. Encounter subtypes were defined by diagnosis codes and buprenorphine receipt was defined as administration or prescribing. We evaluated for racial, ethnic, and sex disparities within encounter subtypes for withdrawal and overdose.

Results: We examined 1,088,033 opioid-related encounters. Adjusted odds for buprenorphine receipt were greater for encounters involving withdrawal (odds ratio [OR] 2.22, 95% CI 2.18-2.26), though reduced for overdose (OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.51-0.53) and other opioid complications (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.70). Males were more likely to receive buprenorphine (OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.19) than females. All racial minorities excepting American Indian/Native American patients (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08) were less likely to receive buprenorphine than White patients (Asian OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.81; Black OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79-0.81; Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89). Subtype analyses indicated decreased odds for buprenorphine receipt for female patients across all subtypes. An increased odds for buprenorphine receipt among Black patients (OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07; ref. White race) was noted in encounters involving opioid withdrawal but disparities persisted for opioid overdose.

Conclusions: The administration and prescribing of buprenorphine in the ED is heavily influenced by the presence of opioid withdrawal. Disparities disadvantage female patients and racial minorities. Some racial disparities, particularly among Black patients, are not evident when solely considering encounters involving opioid withdrawal. System-level interventions are needed to address disparities and improve the equitable uptake of ED-initiated buprenorphine.

急诊丁丙诺啡治疗的种族、民族和性别差异
目的:在全国急诊科(ed)丁丙诺啡的管理和处方中注意到种族和性别差异。目前尚不清楚,当考虑到阿片类药物过量或戒断等遭遇期间处理的具体出院诊断时,差异是否仍然存在。方法:我们使用国家数据库Epic Cosmos对2020年1月至2023年12月期间阿片类药物相关ED遭遇进行了横断面分析。我们分析了阿片类药物遭遇亚型-过量或停药对丁丙诺啡接收的影响,使用多变量logistic回归调整人口统计学和测量的混杂变量。诊断代码定义偶遇亚型,丁丙诺啡接收定义为给药或处方。我们评估了停药和过量用药的遭遇亚型中的种族、民族和性别差异。结果:我们检查了1,088,033例与阿片类药物相关的遭遇。虽然服用丁丙诺啡的调整后的几率在药物戒断时更高(比值比[OR] 2.22, 95% CI 2.18-2.26),但服用过量(OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.51-0.53)和其他阿片类药物并发症(OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.64-0.70)降低。男性比女性更容易接受丁丙诺啡(OR 1.18, 95% CI 1.16-1.19)。除美洲印第安人/美洲原住民患者外,所有少数种族患者(OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08)接受丁丙诺啡的可能性低于白人患者(亚洲OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.79-0.81;黑色OR 0.80, 95% CI 0.79-0.81;夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.71-0.89)。亚型分析表明,所有亚型的女性患者丁丙诺啡接受的几率都降低了。黑人患者接受丁丙诺啡的几率增加(OR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01-1.07;在涉及阿片类药物戒断的遭遇中注意到白人种族,但阿片类药物过量仍然存在差异。结论:丁丙诺啡在急诊科的给药和处方受到阿片类药物戒断的严重影响。性别差异对女性患者和少数族裔不利。一些种族差异,特别是在黑人患者中,在单独考虑涉及阿片类药物戒断的遭遇时并不明显。需要系统层面的干预措施来解决差异并改善ed引发的丁丙诺啡的公平吸收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信