Delayed diagnosis in adolescent onset focal epilepsy: Impact on morbidity and mental health.

IF 6.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Epilepsia Pub Date : 2025-04-28 DOI:10.1111/epi.18434
Monica Ferrer, Nora Jandhyala, Jacob Pellinen, Hadley Greenwood, Liu Lin Thio, Dennis Dlugos, Kristen L Park, Andres M Kanner, Jacqueline French
{"title":"Delayed diagnosis in adolescent onset focal epilepsy: Impact on morbidity and mental health.","authors":"Monica Ferrer, Nora Jandhyala, Jacob Pellinen, Hadley Greenwood, Liu Lin Thio, Dennis Dlugos, Kristen L Park, Andres M Kanner, Jacqueline French","doi":"10.1111/epi.18434","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study was undertaken to investigate diagnostic delay in adolescent onset focal epilepsy, including reasons for longer delays and associated morbidities.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Secondary analysis was done using enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project, a multi-institutional cohort including 34 sites in the USA, Canada, Finland, Austria, and Australia (2012-2017). Participants were aged 11-64 years at enrollment and within 4 months of treatment initiation for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants with seizure onset at age ≤ 21 years were evaluated. Data included seizure diaries documenting onset, frequency, and characteristics of seizures, reasons for diagnostic delays, and prediagnosis morbidities, including injuries, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 152 participants with adolescent onset seizures, those with a diagnosis delay > 1 year experienced a median delay to diagnosis of 4.4 years and reported higher rates of initial nonmotor seizures compared to those diagnosed within 1 year (n = 55, 78.6% vs. n = 33, 40.2%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1</sub> = 22.76, p < .001). Lack of recognition by patients and health care providers accounted for diagnostic delay in more than half (68.2%) of participants with initial nonmotor seizures. Notably, 70% of participants with initial nonmotor seizures went undiagnosed until development of motor seizures. This group reported more injuries compared to those who did not develop motor seizures (56.5% vs. 7.7%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>2</sub> = 19.82, p < .001). Those with time to diagnosis > 1 year had more prediagnostic seizures (67 vs. 5.5 seizures, 95% confidence interval = 16.0-94.0; p < .001) and higher rates of suicidal ideation (33.3% vs. 14.9%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1</sub> = 6.27, p = .01), suicidal behaviors (13.8% vs. 1.5%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1</sub> = 7.19, p = .007), and nonsuicidal self-injurious behaviors (13.4% vs. 1.5%; χ<sup>2</sup> <sub>1</sub> = 7.04, p = .008).</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>This study highlights significant delays in diagnosing adolescent onset focal epilepsy, especially in cases with nonmotor seizures. These delays, often due to lack of recognition by patients and health care providers, are linked to more frequent seizures, higher injury rates, and increased suicidal ideation and self-injury. Early recognition and diagnosis may mitigate adverse outcomes and improve quality of life for adolescents with epilepsy.</p>","PeriodicalId":11768,"journal":{"name":"Epilepsia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epilepsia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.18434","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study was undertaken to investigate diagnostic delay in adolescent onset focal epilepsy, including reasons for longer delays and associated morbidities.

Methods: Secondary analysis was done using enrollment data from the Human Epilepsy Project, a multi-institutional cohort including 34 sites in the USA, Canada, Finland, Austria, and Australia (2012-2017). Participants were aged 11-64 years at enrollment and within 4 months of treatment initiation for newly diagnosed focal epilepsy. Participants with seizure onset at age ≤ 21 years were evaluated. Data included seizure diaries documenting onset, frequency, and characteristics of seizures, reasons for diagnostic delays, and prediagnosis morbidities, including injuries, suicidal ideation, and self-injurious behaviors.

Results: Of 152 participants with adolescent onset seizures, those with a diagnosis delay > 1 year experienced a median delay to diagnosis of 4.4 years and reported higher rates of initial nonmotor seizures compared to those diagnosed within 1 year (n = 55, 78.6% vs. n = 33, 40.2%; χ2 1 = 22.76, p < .001). Lack of recognition by patients and health care providers accounted for diagnostic delay in more than half (68.2%) of participants with initial nonmotor seizures. Notably, 70% of participants with initial nonmotor seizures went undiagnosed until development of motor seizures. This group reported more injuries compared to those who did not develop motor seizures (56.5% vs. 7.7%; χ2 2 = 19.82, p < .001). Those with time to diagnosis > 1 year had more prediagnostic seizures (67 vs. 5.5 seizures, 95% confidence interval = 16.0-94.0; p < .001) and higher rates of suicidal ideation (33.3% vs. 14.9%; χ2 1 = 6.27, p = .01), suicidal behaviors (13.8% vs. 1.5%; χ2 1 = 7.19, p = .007), and nonsuicidal self-injurious behaviors (13.4% vs. 1.5%; χ2 1 = 7.04, p = .008).

Significance: This study highlights significant delays in diagnosing adolescent onset focal epilepsy, especially in cases with nonmotor seizures. These delays, often due to lack of recognition by patients and health care providers, are linked to more frequent seizures, higher injury rates, and increased suicidal ideation and self-injury. Early recognition and diagnosis may mitigate adverse outcomes and improve quality of life for adolescents with epilepsy.

青少年局灶性癫痫的延迟诊断:对发病率和心理健康的影响。
目的:本研究旨在探讨青少年局灶性癫痫的诊断延迟,包括延迟较长时间的原因和相关的发病率。方法:使用人类癫痫项目的入组数据进行二次分析,该项目是一个多机构队列,包括美国、加拿大、芬兰、奥地利和澳大利亚的34个站点(2012-2017)。参与者在入组时年龄为11-64岁,并且在新诊断的局灶性癫痫开始治疗的4个月内。癫痫发作年龄≤21岁的参与者被评估。数据包括癫痫发作日记,记录癫痫发作的发生、频率和特征、诊断延迟的原因以及诊断前的发病率,包括伤害、自杀意念和自残行为。结果:在152名青少年发作的参与者中,与1年内诊断的患者相比,诊断延迟bb10年的患者中位延迟4.4年,报告的初始非运动性发作率更高(n = 55, 78.6% vs n = 33, 40.2%;χ 21 = 22.76, p 22 = 19.82, p 1年的诊断前癫痫发作较多(67次vs. 5.5次,95%可信区间= 16.0 ~ 94.0;p 2 1 = 6.27, p = . 01),自杀行为(13.8% vs . 1.5%;χ2 1 = 7.19, p = .007),非自杀性自伤行为(13.4% vs. 1.5%;χ2 1 = 7.04, p = 0.008)。意义:这项研究强调了青少年局灶性癫痫的诊断延迟,特别是在非运动性癫痫发作的情况下。这些延迟通常是由于患者和卫生保健提供者缺乏认识,与更频繁的癫痫发作、更高的伤害率以及增加的自杀意念和自残有关。早期识别和诊断可以减轻不良后果,提高青少年癫痫患者的生活质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Epilepsia
Epilepsia 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
10.70%
发文量
319
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Epilepsia is the leading, authoritative source for innovative clinical and basic science research for all aspects of epilepsy and seizures. In addition, Epilepsia publishes critical reviews, opinion pieces, and guidelines that foster understanding and aim to improve the diagnosis and treatment of people with seizures and epilepsy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信